Not so Hot Anymore: Fiat Chrysler Changes Sales Reporting Method, Ends Winning Streak
In response to media reports, a lawsuit, and federal investigations into potential sales figure tampering, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles is changing the way it records sales.
This means that the automaker’s much-touted 75-month sales streak is dead. FCA admits that under the new method, its year-over-year monthly sales gains ended in September 2013. Ad copy is likely being rewritten as you read this.
FCA is accused of inflating its monthly sales numbers by adding sales at the end of the month, then rolling them back at the beginning of the next. An Illinois dealer group alleges racketeering, with dealer payouts in exchange for false sales reports.
A report published by Automotive News yesterday claimed that the automaker uncovered the practice during a review. Internal sources claim the review turned up between 5,000 and 6,000 uncompleted sales that found their way onto sales tallies. U.S. sales chief Reid Bigland reportedly put a stop to the practice.
In a statement, FCA said the new methodology will be applied to July 2016 sales:
The objective of this new methodology is to provide in FCA US’s judgment the best available estimate of the number of FCA US vehicles sold to end users through the end of a particular month applying a consistent and transparent methodology. It continues to include some level of estimation in respect of, for example, unwound transactions that straddle a month end and fleet deliveries, which may be placed into service at various times after shipment and delivery. FCA US believes, however, that the consistency in application and transparency of this new methodology provides the most appropriate data for the limited uses to which the monthly vehicle unit sales data should be applied.
FCA took the methodology and applied it to data collected between January 1, 2011 to June 30, 2016. When the “unwound” sales were removed, the numbers differed from those it reported at the time.
“Annual sales volumes under the new methodology for each year … are within approximately 0.7% of the annual unit sales volumes previously reported,” the automaker stated.
Responding to claims of sales tampering, FCA claims it used the previous methodology for 30 years, which was similar to that used by other manufacturers. However, a problem exists with its New Vehicle Delivery Report (where retail sales data is collected from dealers) and unwound sales.
“It is admittedly also possible that a dealer may register the sale in an effort to meet a volume objective (without a specific customer supporting the transaction),” FCA stated. “There is, however, no obvious economic incentive for a dealer to do so, since FCA US’s policy is to reverse all incentives due or paid to a dealer that resulted from the unwound retail sales transaction.”
[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]
Join the conversation
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Frank The last guy was doing fine, this is a sales emergency that they're hoping Tim can fix. They want to hang onto the crazy margins from the covid era, which now in the face of abundant inventory, insane interest rates and inflation are a long distant wet dream. Its time to start offering value again, cash on the hood and 0% financing. Move the metal!
- Gimmeamanual The new Wrangler isn't that new, it's still a JL and so is limited to what the platform can handle as far as addressing on-road handling. One thing Jeep should have done is increase the length of the front lower control arms by using the ones THEY ALREADY SELL with the Mopar lift. That 1/4" makes a big difference.
- TheEndlessEnigma Tesla, relying on subsidies to sell vehicles. Goes to prove Tesla is still not price competitive. As I've asked before, what would happen to tesla pricing if the government subsidies were discontinued? I think the answer is clear, Tesla prices would drop to maintain sales. Now here come VoGhost and Art Vandelay with personal attacks.
- Pig_Iron What an epic series. Thank you Corey. 🙂
- IBx1 The LC Prado, AKA the 4Runner*
Sigh, another round of sales shenanigans on the part of an entity that produces Chryslers. Makes me wonder if there's a sales bank of unsold vehicles piling up at the Michigan State Fairgrounds.
FCA still builds vehicles of questionable quality, never mind bellow average reliability. To say that many of their products are POS vehicles would be high praise... They are terrible, and the cost cutting is obvious to the point that many FCA built cars are at least as flimsy as Russian cars. Don't believe me? Stop by any Dodge/Chrysler dealer and see for yourself. Better yet, rent a low mileage Chrysler Town&Country, or a 200, or even a Dart and just see for yourself how dreadful their products are. If FCA goes belly up it's because of the craptastic products that they're pedling.