Dealer Accuses Fiat Chrysler of Falsifying Sales

by Aaron Cole

Updated: November 5th, 2020 Published: January 14th, 2016

dealer accuses fiat chrysler of falsifying sales

An Illinois dealer said in a lawsuit filed Tuesday that Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, through its regional sales offices, was intimidating and bribing dealers to report bogus sales at the end of the month to reach inflated sales targets. Automotive News reported first on the lawsuit.

The lawsuit filed by dealers of the Napleton Automotive Group accuses FCA of conspiring to inflate sales numbers through payments of tens of thousands of dollars to the dealer in co-op advertising accounts to disguise the practice. The lawsuit says FCA uses bogus third-party data from J.D. Power and Urban Science to falsely “verify” the sales figures and report publicly that the automaker has continued monthly sales growth since it emerged from bankruptcy in 2009.

The news of the lawsuit and its allegations sunk shares of Fiat so far that trading on its stock was halted in Europe, according to the Wall Street Journal.

The lawsuit alleges that dealers participating in FCA’s Volume Growth Program, which is a performance program that rewards sales, were enticed to falsify sales through an “earn and turn” program that would reward dealers that “sold” popular models with more of the same model. The lawsuit alleges that those sales were falsified at the end of the month, then backed out, to receive more popular selling models.

The lawsuit alleges that FCA asked the dealership group to falsely report sales of dozens of cars in exchange for $20,000, credited to the dealership’s advertising account.

FCA didn’t immediately comment on the lawsuit.

Last year, a dealer accused FCA-owned Maserati for falsifying nearly half their December 2014 sales by “punching” models that hadn’t yet been delivered.

Napleton ranked No. 41 in the top 125 largest auto dealers in the U.S. by Automotive News. It has filed several lawsuits against automakers since 1996, including lawsuits against Ford in 2001 and Volkswagen in 2010 for reasons unrelated to its current complaint against FCA.

#Fca #FiatChryslerAutomobiles #Lawsuit #Napleton #Sales #SalesData

Aaron Cole

More by Aaron Cole

Comments

Join the conversation

6 of 24 comments

Vulpine on Jan 14, 2016

Two things wrong with this lawsuit: 1) Why is it just two dealerships that are owned by a single franchise that are filing this suit? 2) Why is this not a criminal investigation and only a civil suit? Whether true or not, these two questions bring the whole lawsuit into question. Could it be that the franchise itself is the one that's been doing questionable accounting?

Like Reply
- See 3 previous
- And003 on Jan 14, 2016
  
  Good questions, both of them. If these practices were going on, I would think more dealerships around the country would file suit. Furthermore, what proof does this dealer have of such practices?
  
  Like
- Scoutdude on Jan 15, 2016
  
  #1 Maybe they are the only ones to have the guts to do so or they are the only one that is ethical enough to do so. #2 Because they can't file a criminal case you need a gov't prosecuting attorney to do so. If this lawsuit has merit then it is highly likely that a criminal case could be filed.
  
  Like
- BklynPete on Jan 15, 2016
  
  @Scoutdude It'll certainly be interesting to see how far this goes.
  
  Like
- Vulpine on Jan 15, 2016
  
  @Scoutdude #1 Maybe they are the only ones to have the guts to do so or they are the only one that is ethical enough to do so. -- Highly unlikely since this is almost guaranteed to cost them the franchise no matter how it comes out. -------------------------------------------- #2 Because they can’t file a criminal case you need a gov’t prosecuting attorney to do so. If this lawsuit has merit then it is highly likely that a criminal case could be filed. -- Which is exactly why this is questionable, as a legitimate complaint should go to government investigators. The fact that it didn't means these dealerships (one franchise) are after money, not justice.
  
  Like
And003 on Jan 16, 2016

Speaking for myself, until Napleton produces proof beyond a reasonable doubt that FCA is engaged in such activities, I have to regard their claims as suspect.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Proud2BUnion I typically recommend that no matter what make or model you purchase used, just assure that is HAS a prior salvage/rebuilt title. Best "Bang for your buck"!
Redapple2 jeffbut they dont want to ... their pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. More truck profit than the other 3. Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = 2x ford total @ $15,000 profit per. Tons o $ to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire
Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.