Dealer Accuses Fiat Chrysler of Falsifying Sales

by Aaron Cole

Updated: November 5th, 2020

dealer accuses fiat chrysler of falsifying sales

An Illinois dealer said in a lawsuit filed Tuesday that Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, through its regional sales offices, was intimidating and bribing dealers to report bogus sales at the end of the month to reach inflated sales targets. Automotive News reported first on the lawsuit.

The lawsuit filed by dealers of the Napleton Automotive Group accuses FCA of conspiring to inflate sales numbers through payments of tens of thousands of dollars to the dealer in co-op advertising accounts to disguise the practice. The lawsuit says FCA uses bogus third-party data from J.D. Power and Urban Science to falsely “verify” the sales figures and report publicly that the automaker has continued monthly sales growth since it emerged from bankruptcy in 2009.

The news of the lawsuit and its allegations sunk shares of Fiat so far that trading on its stock was halted in Europe, according to the Wall Street Journal.

The lawsuit alleges that dealers participating in FCA’s Volume Growth Program, which is a performance program that rewards sales, were enticed to falsify sales through an “earn and turn” program that would reward dealers that “sold” popular models with more of the same model. The lawsuit alleges that those sales were falsified at the end of the month, then backed out, to receive more popular selling models.

The lawsuit alleges that FCA asked the dealership group to falsely report sales of dozens of cars in exchange for $20,000, credited to the dealership’s advertising account.

FCA didn’t immediately comment on the lawsuit.

Last year, a dealer accused FCA-owned Maserati for falsifying nearly half their December 2014 sales by “punching” models that hadn’t yet been delivered.

Napleton ranked No. 41 in the top 125 largest auto dealers in the U.S. by Automotive News. It has filed several lawsuits against automakers since 1996, including lawsuits against Ford in 2001 and Volkswagen in 2010 for reasons unrelated to its current complaint against FCA.

#Fca #FiatChryslerAutomobiles #Lawsuit #Napleton #Sales #SalesData

Aaron Cole

More by Aaron Cole

Comments

Join the conversation

6 of 24 comments

Vulpine on Jan 14, 2016

Two things wrong with this lawsuit: 1) Why is it just two dealerships that are owned by a single franchise that are filing this suit? 2) Why is this not a criminal investigation and only a civil suit? Whether true or not, these two questions bring the whole lawsuit into question. Could it be that the franchise itself is the one that's been doing questionable accounting?

Like Reply
- See 3 previous
- And003 on Jan 14, 2016
  
  Good questions, both of them. If these practices were going on, I would think more dealerships around the country would file suit. Furthermore, what proof does this dealer have of such practices?
  
  Like
- Scoutdude on Jan 15, 2016
  
  #1 Maybe they are the only ones to have the guts to do so or they are the only one that is ethical enough to do so. #2 Because they can't file a criminal case you need a gov't prosecuting attorney to do so. If this lawsuit has merit then it is highly likely that a criminal case could be filed.
  
  Like
- BklynPete on Jan 15, 2016
  
  @Scoutdude It'll certainly be interesting to see how far this goes.
  
  Like
- Vulpine on Jan 15, 2016
  
  @Scoutdude #1 Maybe they are the only ones to have the guts to do so or they are the only one that is ethical enough to do so. -- Highly unlikely since this is almost guaranteed to cost them the franchise no matter how it comes out. -------------------------------------------- #2 Because they can’t file a criminal case you need a gov’t prosecuting attorney to do so. If this lawsuit has merit then it is highly likely that a criminal case could be filed. -- Which is exactly why this is questionable, as a legitimate complaint should go to government investigators. The fact that it didn't means these dealerships (one franchise) are after money, not justice.
  
  Like
And003 on Jan 16, 2016

Speaking for myself, until Napleton produces proof beyond a reasonable doubt that FCA is engaged in such activities, I have to regard their claims as suspect.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Tassos Ask me if I care for the idiotic vehicles less than 10% of whose owners use as INTENDED.
Brandon The 2024 Mercedes-Benz E 350 4Matic looks like a compelling addition to the luxury sedan market. From the drive notes, it’s clear that Mercedes-Benz has maintained its commitment to blending performance with comfort. The handling and acceleration seem impressive, reflecting Mercedes’ signature blend of power and smoothness.
Jmanb52 In this case clearly a driver responsbile for the accident. Lawyer just trying to add confusion to jude and or jury to think about it. I was on a jury once for an auto accident and one of the attorneys tried a few stunts to shift blame. Same thing is happening here. The companies pushing autonamous want to deal with fleet markets like the autonamous taxi companies rather than individual consumers. In my opinion I think they belvie that would be more predictable sales. Car gets to xyz milage time to replace. In my opinion they could never sell a full autonamous car to an individual because of a back and forth legal battles between owner and maker when there is a crash. They need to foget about all these take over driver aids. It is just causing more issues than it could prevent.
Jmanb52 Short answer is NO! It has been a tread for manufactures to basicaly glue a tablet to an area of the dash and call it an infotament system. However there is not one of us on here that doesn't ahve a smart phone or tablet. With the android auto, and the Apple Carplay and bluetooth that conencts car spekers and mic to our headset, do we even need an Infotament system or just bluetooth connection to use hands free mic and spearkers or wired connection to USB port for connection to spearkers / mic and charge the phone. So maybe the QOTD should be do manufactures even need to provide an infotanement system or should they just provide an in dash holder for a tablet or smartphone?
Jmanb52 In the past year I did some more research on EVs. I already knew for years they were heavier than a ICE car of the same model / class. Like the F150 lightning can be 1000 LBS heavier than its ICE counterpart. In the last year I read more on the size of breaks, tires and other items that take more resrouces to create and polute more in their wear. This was another nail in my corporate EV caufin. I already didn't have much care for them due to my height (over 6 feet) and they all have a bad desgin, over dependency on gimics, over computerized driving experience. If I ever did get one it would be a low range in town only type vehicle that I would convert an older car. There is no manufacture making EVs that is worth a penny of my money.