Hyundai Teases RM16 Concept, Reminds People It's Still Planning a Performance Division

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Remember the ‘N’ Division, Hyundai’s effort to bring attainable performance to its buyers? No?

Hyundai launched the division last September, three years after it created Project RM (Racing Midship) to test high-performance technology for use in future vehicles. So far, the division hasn’t yielded a production vehicle, but the automaker appears to be getting closer.

A new concept, the Veloster-based RM16, dropped at the Busan Motor Show in South Korea today, designed to hint at the characteristics of N models to come. There’s also news of a successful engine acid test at last weekend’s Nurburgring 24h Race.

Three concept cars led to the RM16, with each serving as a “rolling lab” for engineers.

“Our RM16 and Hyundai N 2025 Vision Gran Turismo concepts are inspired by the passion for performance, that you will soon see evolve into our first N model,” said Woong-chul Yang, head of Hyundai’s research and design center, in a statement.

Powering the two-seat RM16 is a mid-mounted 2.0-liter four-cylinder featuring turbocharging and direct injection, mated to a six-speed manual transmission. The body’s aluminum space frame is clad with carbon fiber-reinforced plastic body panels, and special attention was given to weight distribution.

The concept’s tuned Theta engine, which makes 295 horsepower, was given an acid test at the Nurburgring 24h Race last weekend. During its first appearance on any racetrack, the automaker said the mill “met all expectations.”

Though the test vehicle only placed 90th out of 159 cars, it recorded the fastest lap time, breaking the 10-minute barrier.

When will an N models start to appear in Hyundai showrooms? The automaker’s not saying just yet.

[Image: Hyundai Motor Company]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 14 comments
  • 64andahalf 64andahalf on Jun 02, 2016

    Vizzini: "Never go in against a Sicilian when death is on the line!" 64andahalf: "Never go in against a Korean when tenacity is the test!" I think they'll get there. I think they've already closed many of the styling gaps they used to have.

  • Dougjp Dougjp on Jun 03, 2016

    While Hyundai is at it, why don't they dish out a reminder that they PLAN on bringing out something to compete with a BMW 3 or 2 series, Audi 4 or 3 series, Mercedes C series? Should have happened over 5 years ago, what are they calling this luxury compact now, a G70 or something......

  • Slavuta CX5 hands down. Only trunk space, where RAV4 is better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Oof 😣 for Tesla.https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-05-03-nhtsa-probes-tesla-recall-over-autopilot-concerns.html
  • Slavuta Autonomous cars can be used by terrorists.
  • W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
Next