Marchionne Straddles the World, Shouting 'Jeeps for Everyone!'

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

The Jeep brand is Fiat-Chrysler’s biggest money maker, so it’s no wonder that CEO Sergio Marchionne is scattering factories around the world like a sailor’s offspring.

The company’s head honcho outlined his business plan for the brand in an interview published by Automotive News, and it involves no longer having to make a “Sophie’s Choice” decision with Jeep output.

Explosive Jeep sales, coupled with that of Ram, make up for the faltering Dodge and Chrysler brands and allow FCA to post a profit, despite trouble in its small vehicle lineup. However, global demand outstrips existing production capacity, meaning the Jeep-hungry American market gets its fill, while overseas markets get an empty plate.

Building Jeep factories in growing markets gives Marchionne a hedge against domestic uncertainty, and he’s just gotten started laying the bricks.

“One of the things that we’ve always faced in the United States in the production of Jeeps is to make this unfortunate Sophie’s Choice about whether we sell in the U.S. or sell overseas,” Marchionne said, adding. “Even if there were a contraction of the U.S. market, there is in our view unexplored potential in terms of [overseas] markets, especially where we have not established local production.”

The target markets for the Jeep brand are Europe, the Asia-Pacific region and Latin America. Smaller, fuel-efficient models like the Renegade and whatever replaces the Compass/Patriot twins seem tailor-made for those high-growth regions.

Last year, FCA added Jeep Cherokee manufacturing capacity in China and a Renegade production line in Brazil. This year, Renegade production comes to China, with the Compass/Patriot replacement slated for Mexico, China and Brazil.

The three years after that will see Renegade production come to India, and U.S. capacity grown to handle the Wagoneer, Grand Wagoneer, and Wrangler pickup. A sub-Renegade mini-SUV, based on a Fiat platform, might be in the works for the Indian, Indonesian and African markets.

Marchionne wants first-time overseas Jeep buyers to get hooked on the brand, and move up to bigger and more expensive Jeeps as they grow in age and affluence.

If Jeep volume grows the way he hopes, Marchionne won’t have to break a sweat finding someone to make Chrysler 200s and Dodge Darts for him.

[Image: FCA US LLC]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
10 of 94 comments
  • Nickoo Nickoo on May 02, 2016

    FCA will not make it past Trump's first term. FCA has had 7 years to develop alternative propulsion (aka hybrid) cars and hasn't done squat. FCA has had 7 years to develop a decent 4 cylinder. FCA has had 7 years to develop a decent transmission. FCA has had 7 years to develop a decent midsizer, a decent compact, a subcompact. FCA's best vehicles are riding on the coat-tails of what is left from Daimler. Everything that turned around chrysler, that was good, came from pre-FCA plans and was developed under Cerberus: Pentastar, 300/Charger/Challenger second gens, viper come-back, new RAM, new JGC, new Durango. Chrysler under Cerberus had the new midsizer in active development, and instead was forced to use CUSW and horrible 9 speed transmissions. Chrysler Corp. could have been a contender. They won't be around in 2020.

    • See 7 previous
    • Lou_BC Lou_BC on May 03, 2016

      @28-Cars-Later "No questioning allowed at all". That is what the Patriot act is for and Snowden seems to have covered the rest. Guantanamo Bay is still available or extraordinary rendition to countries that conveniently ignore human rights (well, ignores them more than we do).

  • Eyeflyistheeye Eyeflyistheeye on May 02, 2016

    I rented a compact car for a weekend trip to San Diego on Friday (I live in Los Angeles). After getting an atrocious Mitsubishi Lancer with all of 5500 miles that managed to couple stiff steering and floaty suspension replete with a seat that hurt my back and Bluetooth that wouldn't pair, I went back to Avis and they put me in a 2015 Cherokee Latitude with the 2.4. I liked the Trailhawk I test drove when the KL came out, but I wasn't expecting much from the Latitude. To make a long story short, while I don't miss the opportunity to poke Sergio and FCA for bad business decisions, the Cherokee had enough get up on the highway with five people inside, averaged 25 mpg, the 9HP was fine seeing how I actually know how to modulate throttle input and I didn't miss the handling of my Focus one bit. I wondered why Sergio couldn't build the rest of his lineup like that, then I realized where FCA plunked their money down. And yes, I am very tempted to pull the trigger on a slightly-used Cherokee ($15-$17k) of course with an extended warranty.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Next