Korean Carmaker Ssangyong Looks At US Market During A Dramatic Rebirth

Phillip Thomas
by Phillip Thomas

Ssangyong has had a colorful history, to put it lightly. In 1999, the Korean brand entered bankruptcy as its Chinese majority owner, SAIC Motor Company cut Ssangyong loose. Ssangyong made a frenzied attempt to cut its workforce down, and faced one of the worst labor strikes in the Korean auto industry’s history. In retaliation for the cuts, the workers of Ssangyong’s Pyongtaek production plant set fire to the plant, and later occupied it for two months. Riot police, including helicopter support, was called in eventually to clear the plant.

With Ssangyong in shambles, Indian automaker Mahindra & Mahindra bought a 70% stake in the company in 2011 and immediately went to work on labor issues. Since the acquisition, Ssangyong has not suffered any labor downtime and the once rioting workforce now appears to be diligently rebuilding the auto maker, one car at a time.

In 2013, Ssangyong returned and racked up its highest sales, with 145,649 cars sold last year. 81,679 of those sales were made in overseas markets; and a spokesman for Ssangyong confirmed to WardsAuto that the Korean Automaker is looking to expand its product to the U.S. market.

The spokesman confirmed to Wards that a portfolio for North America is being planned with a consultant to help find an approach to the U.S., with the key being a friendly brand name. Aside from the odd-sounding name (to American eyes and ears, at least), Ssangyong looks to leave behind the battle torn image of the past, and exude a quality product.

Ssangyong’s President and CEO Yoo-il Lee has set high goals for 2016, and the U.S. market is a must if they intend to meet them, with a target of 300,000 vehicles by 2016.

But that’s about where the announced plan stops. As mentioned, with last year’s sales hovering just below 150,000, the “Promise 2016” plan intends to double that in a scant two years. With no product ready for U.S. emissions and safety and no dealer network, it’s a lofty goal. US dealers are still wary after Mahindra’s ongoing failure to bring their diesel pick to the US by 2010, and we’ll be impressed if Ssangyong can enter the U.S. market by their 2016 sales goal.

Phillip Thomas
Phillip Thomas

More by Phillip Thomas

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 75 comments
  • Jeff S Jeff S on Feb 17, 2014

    @DM--I am doubtful about Ssangyong entering the US market. As soon as they would enter with a compact 4 door car Nissan would bring the Micra into the market and undercut them. Hyundai and Kia would have a lower price entry as well. Chevy would compete with a lower cost Daewoe as well. The Chinese could eventually enter the US but they might make vehicles for GM, Ford, Chrysler, Toyota, or Nissan before they enter on their own. Many potential franchisees would be wary of doing business with Ssangyong since it is owned by Mahindra. I do see a potential for a midsize diesel truck if it is priced right.

  • DenverMike DenverMike on Feb 18, 2014

    @Jeff S - Without consumer confidence, who cares how low the price is? Would you spend $30,000 for a hard loaded Korean truck that'll likely fall apart and be worth $800 retail in five years when the OEM leaves the US laughing? Of course you would... Why was anybody buying Corollas and Sentras when they could have bought a Daewoo or Daihatu at a huge savings and way more bang for your buck?

    • Big Al from Oz Big Al from Oz on Feb 21, 2014

      @DiM Many do buy Daewoo, even in the US. Again use Google, your insight isn't very credible.

  • 1995 SC They cost more while not doing anything ICE can't already do
  • Michael S6 PHEV are a transitional vehicles category until more efficient batteries are available and access to charging stations significantly improves. Currently I will buy an EV if I'm only driving in town and a PHEV if I need a road car as well.
  • Frank Bring back the gas Abarth with 250hp, that'll get peoples attention
  • EBFlex PHEVs are the ONLY reasonable solution to lowering the amount of oil we use for fuel. Because they are not being aggressively invested in and because the government is pushing EV, which are far worse than any other vehicles on the road, it’s clear the push to EVs has nothing to do with the environment.
  • Tassos On the 140, Sacco was 100% correct to not be fully satisfied with it, and that if it was shorter (he said by 10 cm, this is probably too much) it would sure look much sleeker and more elegant. This especially affected the coupe version, the successor to the perfect 560 SEC. But as it is, it looks more imposing and more arrogant and the interior room is indeed cavernous, which one can appreciate if he is 6 9" or above, OR if one is a typical morbidly obese, auto illiterate American of 2024.
Next