Chrysler Changes Product Plans Again, Extends "Sell-By Date" Of Avenger, Caravan, Wrangler

Derek Kreindler
by Derek Kreindler

Chrysler CEO Sergio Marchionne may not be fond of changing up his outfits, but he certainly has no problem mixing up product plans. The latest news out of Auburn Hills suggests that Chrysler will be extending the lifespan of some key products for up to another 5 years.

Under the new regime, the Dodge Avenger, one of Chrysler’s main fleet queens and the key cannibalizer of Dart sales, gets a stay of execution until 2015. The Dodge Grand Caravan will run until 2017, an extension of two years past its planned replacement date, while the Jeep Wrangler, which is said to be undergoing a radical redesign, will stay on the market in its current form until 2018.

Chrysler has good reasons to keep all three vehicles going. The Avenger’s platform-twin, the Chrysler 200, will be replaced next year in a major redesign, and by keeping the Avenger around, Chrysler will have a cheap sedan to sell to fleets ( and presumably, less-than-qualified buyers).

The Grand Caravan can also fill that role in minivan form, while a redesigned Chrysler Town & Country will apparently be introduced to consolidate Chrysler’s minivan position. But the popularity of the Grand Caravan among fleet buyers and in the Canadian market has been said to give Chrysler pause about killing it off entirely. For some time, plans have called for one brand to get a minivan and one brand to get two crossovers. Automotive News seems to think that Chrysler will get the van and presumably Dodge will have a redesigned Journey – and a Grand Caravan too.

The decision to keep the Wrangler kicking around is seemingly more transparent. By extending its lifespan another two years, Jeep can get more capacity at its Toledo, Ohio plant, which is said to be running flat-out. In addition to a whole bunch of brand new features like aluminum body panels and an air suspension, the Wrangler will apparently get a diesel engine and a pickup variant. Right now, Jeep is selling Wranglers, particularly the 4-door Unlimited model, as fast as they can, with special edition variants not lasting long on dealer lots. Presumably, Chrysler will keep pumping them out for another few years to keep Jeep buyers satiated.

Derek Kreindler
Derek Kreindler

More by Derek Kreindler

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 44 comments
  • PrincipalDan PrincipalDan on Jul 25, 2013

    I love how this whole thread has revolved around the Wrangler. Caravan - awesome, I see it selling in great numbers and even our resident "tame racing driver" loves it. It helps that Toyota and Honda want to charge an arm and a leg for their vans. Avenger - a car that has now reached the point of the old W-Impala. Cheap, unloved, and (in V6 form) hauls butt. Routinely embarrassing the Dart by outselling it just as the Impala embarrassed the Malibu by outselling it for a few years.

    • CelticPete CelticPete on Jul 27, 2013

      Eh. I like Chysler and Dodge way more then most. But I am concerned that their development time line is just way to slow. The only real new car they released has been the Dart - and is the Dart GT even here yet?

  • Big Al from Oz Big Al from Oz on Jul 25, 2013

    Well, talking about new products. The Wrangler in the photo is the exact colour my 95 Cherokee Sport was, those rims are the exact rims as well with same huge amounts of lead to balance them. I wonder if the Jeep still run the same Koni shocks as well. If Fiat wants to do something, they should get the Rampage concept and drop it onto a full ladder frame chassis, call it a Dodge and take on the global midsize market (it has to be reliable and durable). Fiat have a great range of little diesels to use in it as well as some V6s.

    • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Jul 25, 2013

      I saw what you're talking about on the street a few years ago, but not quite how you envision it. Somebody got an old short-wheelbase Caravan and peeled off the roof from behind the driver's seat to the back door, removed the windows, and built a divider between the front "cab" and the "box". That was done on old 1960s A100's by the factory, and I think Ford made some Econoline pickups too. The Caravan pickup I saw was FWD though, and I saw it from the driver's side, so no idea how the builder handled the sliding door.

  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
Next