VW Giving "Spanish Pontiac" One Last Chance

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Whenever TTAC took GM to task for branding run amok and excessive platform sharing, the example of Volkswagen has always been the key counterfactual. With seven brands available in Europe, the Volkswagen-Audi group is the continental GM, always looking for another way to repackage a pedestrian FWD platform. The only difference is that VW has actually been growing. But Wolfsburg’s brand profligacy is starting to bear some GM-style bitter fruit. Skoda has been surprisingly strong of late, actually making problems for the Volkswagen brand in certain markets. Seat, on the other hand, is not doing so well. With only one factory, at Martorell, near Barcelona, Seat has always been a slightly niche player, offering older VW designs with some Pontiac-style “emotional” styling flair and a sportier image. The problem now, as Seat CEO James Muir tells The WSJ [sub], is that

The brand really is too small for this plant

Running at only 60 percent of its 500,000 unit capacity, Seat is too small for its lone plant. As a result, VW is launching a last-ditch effort to save its dying brand.


And make no mistake, the rescue of Seat is a last-chance effort. Muir explains

I think this is the last attempt for the brand. It wouldn’t make sense to think something else. If one would want to get rid of Seat, one would have to give the other party money to take it.

Seat lost about $430m last year, as sales dropped eight percent to 337,000 units, according to BusinessWeek. So, what’s the problem? The European market is projected to contract this year, and Seat isn’t just VW’s weakest brand… it’s one of the weakest brands in Europe. Sales in Seat’s main market, Spain, fell 21 percent last year, and the other Southern European markets where Seat is popular haven’t fared well lately either. And outside of being a Volkswagen for those vulnerable Mediterranean markets, it’s not clear what Seat is supposed to mean to anyone else. Mike Tyndall, an automotive analyst at Nomura Securities in London, explains

It seems to me that VW hasn’t fully committed itself yet to the brand image of Seat. At some point they wanted Seat to be the sporty brand within the VW family, but some of the model decisions don’t add up

So what’s the plan to rescue this weakened and increasingly irrelevant brand? According to CEO Muir

Our clear focus over the next three years will be to improve utilization. One cannot solely rely on cost reductions to make Seat profitable

That means building the Audi Q3 compact crossover in Martorell, and boosting sales of Seat’s Golf-based Leon from 75k units to 200k units by adding more variants. Currently at nine models, Seat plans on increasing its number of nameplates to 40 by 2018. More fleet business is also in the cards.

And though overcapacity of the kind that’s bringing down Seat is a distinctively European problem, the brand’s troubles are more than a little reminiscent of Pontiacs. Skoda competes with Seat in the budget-VW category, and does so consistently better across Europe. Seat is supposed to be the “sporty Volkswagen” brand, but it must compete with GTIs and Skoda RS models. And despite struggling with geographic limitations to its appeal, VW thinks it can solve the brands problems by boosting volume and nameplates. As we all know by now, taking a sporty brand into the mass-market with more models and more fleet sales is a classic technique for destroying its last vestiges of authentic appeal. Just ask the Pontiac G6. Keeping Seat alive is just another step for Volkswagen down the path towards General Motors-dom.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 12 comments
  • Buckshot Buckshot on May 13, 2010

    Seat has some attractive models, on the outside. The interiors on the other hand are depressing. It is a plain, cheap and ugly looking place. To get it more "sporty", the gearing is lower than VWs.

  • Galne Gunnar Galne Gunnar on May 14, 2010

    I think the Altea and Leon look just fine! Should we discuss matters of taste? (No.) Seat could have just the right sporting image, if they made them drive like Peugeots used to (205, 206, 306, 406... ), for example.

  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next