Daimler CEO: 'Streamlining the Portfolio' Necessary for Mercedes-Benz

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Still in the midst of a $1.4-billion restructuring plan that aims to cut 10 percent of its workforce, Mercedes-Benz is reconsidering what its product lineup should look like moving ahead. While most of the doomed models will be chosen due to lackluster demand (e.g. X-Class pickup) plenty will be nixed as a result of tightening emission laws. Mercedes parent Daimler issued two profit warnings in 2019 after the luxury brand was fined $960 million in an emissions-cheating settlement. Like many automakers, it was also hemorrhaging cash through its investments in electrification.

An apt analogy for the automotive industry’s stampede toward EVs would be lemmings hurling themselves off a seaside cliff — but not because of the popular misconception that the critters are intentionally committing mass suicide. When lemmings collectively off themselves, it’s the result of migratory behavior gone awry. They simply bunch up and move in a singular direction, largely unaware of the consequences.

However, automakers have to contend with social pressures the little rodents are not subjected to. Environmental regulations in places like Europe and China have effectively forced the hand of many automakers hoping to sell their wares in any meaningful volumes without incurring massive fines. This leaves automakers like Daimler in a bit of predicament, as they lose money on costly development projects that they’ve effectively been forced into. It’ll definitely influence which models/trims Mercedes-Benz places beneath the axe.

Daimler board member Markus Schaefer addressed the issue on Tuesday, telling reporters that cost-cutting would likely encourage the company to reduce the number of variants in Mercedes’ lineup, while platforms and powertain options were further consolidated.

“We will review our current lineup and the idea is streamlining the portfolio,” he said.

According to Reuters, a number of the products slated for elimination would be the result of those tightening emission rules, making note of the Euro 7 exhaust standards. “The question is how many engines you take through the gauge, through Euro 7,” Schaefer explained. “Of course the four-cylinder has more chance to make it than the V-12 to pass the gate.”

From Reuters:

Separately Daimler CEO [Ola Källenius] said the automaker has “no issues” securing electric vehicle battery cells, and is ramping up battery production to meet high demand for plug-in models.

“There is such a high demand for plug-ins, we are ramping up battery production as we speak,” [Källenius] said on the conference call.

Daimler plans to add electric vehicle capacity this year and next year.

[Källenius] said demand for plug-in hybrid models is driven in part by German companies guiding employees who get company cars as a benefit to choose electrified models.

Europe also has government incentives in place to encourage plug-in purchases, with Germany offering sizable tax breaks for buying electric — something Källenius said helped raise demand immensely. European passenger vehicle registrations rose 1.2 percent last year (moving roughly 180,000 more cars than in 2018). About 75,000 of the total sales were EVs, representing a 121-percent increase over the previous annum and providing a silver lining for the industry.

Still, it’s hardly a bed of roses. It’s long been rumored that German manufacturers are having serious problems with their battery suppliers, with Mercedes said to be butting heads with LG Chem. Daimler denies that the situation resulted in lowered production targets for the EQC electric crossover. However, LG Chem was also believed to at the center of Audi’s delay on the E-Tron and a production stall of Jaguar’s I-Pace. Regardless of what is causing the battery supply issue, the Germans are now seeking to lock down the raw materials necessary for battery production for themselves; meanwhile, no one is discussing scaling back EV development programs.

They’re in it to win it … or lose it, if the market dictates that outcome.

[Image: Franz12/Shutterstock]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 7 comments
  • Tele Vision Tele Vision on Mar 04, 2020

    "[Källenius] said demand for plug-in hybrid models is driven in part by German companies guiding employees who get company cars as a benefit to choose electrified models." I asked my company, "Were I to buy an electric car, can I charge it all day at work?" The answer was 'Don't Ask/Don't Tell'. I'd need a Rivian for where I live and work, though.

  • Golden2husky Golden2husky on Mar 05, 2020

    Whatever the reason, Mercedes needs to cull through their lineup...who can even keep all those models straight anymore? And do you really need an AMG of nearly everything?

  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
  • SPPPP I am actually a pretty big Alfa fan ... and that is why I hate this car.
  • SCE to AUX They're spending billions on this venture, so I hope so.Investing during a lull in the EV market seems like a smart move - "buy low, sell high" and all that.Key for Honda will be achieving high efficiency in its EVs, something not everybody can do.
  • ChristianWimmer It might be overpriced for most, but probably not for the affluent city-dwellers who these are targeted at - we have tons of them in Munich where I live so I “get it”. I just think these look so terribly cheap and weird from a design POV.
Next