By on November 14, 2019

On Thursday, Daimler made an announcement confirming earlier reports that it plans to cut roughly ten percent of its management staff as part of a broader restructuring plan. Financial hardship has become a sign of the times for the auto industry. Most sizable manufacturers are coming off an investment spree aimed at developing new-energy vehicles, autonomous driving systems, and connected services. Unfortunately, those commitments came at roughly the same time the world’s largest auto markets started to collectively plateau.

A broad approach no longer seems feasible for all but the absolute largest automakers on the planet. We’ve seen many attempt to downsize through restructuring or by entering inte partnerships with other firms to share costs — sometimes both. Knowing this as well as anyone, Daimler issued two profit warnings this year as Mercedes-Benz was fined $960 million in an emissions-cheating settlement while hemorrhaging cash through EV investments. 

That one-two punch forced Mercedes to drop its EBIT margin outlook to a 3- to 5-percent range for 2019. Ideally, the brand would like to see double that, and it intends to cut costs until its profitability improves. But it acknowledged the advancement will be gradual, estimating a return to its former financial glory would take until at least 2023, with incremental financial improvements beforehand.

“Mid-term targets are very disappointing,” and the strategic announcements are “much too general,” Juergen Pieper, a Frankfurt-based analyst with Bankhaus Metzler, told Bloomberg.

From Bloomberg:

Job cuts are a critical component of the effort to make the manufacturer leaner. At the Mercedes cars unit, 10 [percent] of management positions as well as an indefinite number of “indirect” administrative roles will be eliminated to reduce costs be more than 1 billion euros. The trucks unit will save 300 million euros in personnel costs in Europe.

“In the automotive industry we are facing difficult times,” Michael Brecht, Daimler’s leading employee representative, said in a statement. “We have to face this reality, but we must not save on the future viability of our company.”

“We are positioning the company for the transformation with a clear strategy for the future. The expenditure needed to achieve the CO2 targets require comprehensive measures to increase efficiency in all areas of our company. This also includes streamlining our processes and structures,” said Ola Källenius, Chairman of the Board of Management of Daimler AG and Mercedes-Benz AG.

“This will have a negative impact on our earnings in 2020 and 2021. To remain successful in the future, we must therefore act now and significantly increase our financial strength.”

That seems to indicate the push toward electrification is still on. Former Daimler head Dieter Zetsche planned on getting at least 20 new plug-in hybrid and fully-electric Mercedes models on the road by 2020. And Källenius has said the latest EQ concepts being previewed this year will pave the way for new battery-powered vehicles from MB. The new CEO claims these vehicles will help the automaker get within reach of Europe’s aggressive (and creeping) vehicle emission targets, noting that consumers will still need to purchase them if any of this is to work. This, again, isn’t a problem that’s unique to Daimler — but one it will have to cope with, anyway.

“Daimler urgently needs to move away from its ‘spray and pray’ investment philosophy and toward a materially more focused, sharpened allocation of its funds,” Arndt Ellinghorst, a London-based analyst with Evercore ISI, said in a note prior to the Daimler presentation. “Otherwise, the group will simply be unable to self-fund its premium mobility aspirations.”

While the automaker’s restructuring strategy appears to indicate additional changes, the current rules propose capping capital expenditures and developmental costs at 2019 levels — with aims to bring them down in the coming years. Investments will also be more closely monitored in a bid to keep liquidity high. Meanwhile, Daimler’s European truck operations will reduce variable and personnel costs by 550 million euros through the end of 2022.

However, the company stressed it needs to maintain a high level of investment in programs dealing with maximizing emissions reductions.

“The expanded range of plug-in hybrids and all-electric vehicles is leading to cost increases that will have a negative impact on Mercedes-Benz Cars’ return on sales. A consistent product plan has been put in place to achieve the fleet targets in the European Union,” the automaker explained in its release.

We imagine Daimler having a couple of rough years, likely with additional restructuring efforts surfacing in the interim. The current plan gives off the vibe that this is only the first step toward improving profitability, not a catch-all solution that guarantees it’s on the road to recovery. EV development costs will remain high through at least 2025 , while the connectivity services being pushed (that we aren’t particularly fond of) probably won’t start amassing wealth until the latter stages of Daimler’s restructuring plan.

[Image: Pixfly/Shutterstock]

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

4 Comments on “Mercedes Confirms Job Cuts in $1.4 Billion Restructuring Plan...”


  • avatar
    Verbal

    Cost-cutting efforts aren’t supposed to result in the cheapening of the end product, but inevitably they do. In the late 90’s, M-B was getting beaten on price by the likes of Lexus. Their resulting cost-cutting resulted in the now infamous quality and durability lapses.

    If history is a lesson, the next few years will not be a good time to buy a new Benz.

  • avatar
    redapple

    Mercedes I have a question.

    Is it true the historic, excellent and lovely E350 now has a compliance / chicom 2.0 turbo four banger?

    Really?

    Why even bother.

  • avatar
    raynla

    Meanwhile…A leading US automobile company just announced its building a giant manufacturing facility in its backyard.

    The “Tesla Effect” is real!

  • avatar
    ToddAtlasF1

    Wouldn’t they have been better off killing their F1 program?

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • jmo: “It’s time for a recall of the whole damn thing.” Wouldn’t that depend on the relative death...
  • bkojote: It’s pretty obvious Corey Lewis hasn’t driven a Tesla with Autopilot, and he’s hardly...
  • Vulpine: @13withinfinity: Just as there are niche locations where a horse is more viable than an ICE, there are niche...
  • tomLU86: WHy? C’mon man! Tried and proven, plus Toyota reliability. So Chris, can you please tell us how many...
  • multicam: Dal said: “They don’t need a recall; they need an injunction stopping them from using the name “Autopilot”...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Contributors

  • Timothy Cain, Canada
  • Matthew Guy, Canada
  • Ronnie Schreiber, United States
  • Bozi Tatarevic, United States
  • Chris Tonn, United States
  • Corey Lewis, United States
  • Mark Baruth, United States