NADA 2019: Ford Outlines Rewards Program, Says Standalone Stores Essential for Lincoln

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Last year, Ford announced its intent to develop a rewards program aimed at keeping customers engaged — while also making it worth their while to stick with the brand for their next purchase. While customer rewards are old hat, regardless of industry, automakers are busy devising new ways of using the venerable marketing theory to improve customer retention. It’s an urgent gambit, given today’s cooling market.

General Motors launched its “My GM Rewards” loyalty program in 2018, using a points-based system to reward customers who use OnStar’s new services, purchase a new vehicle, or service an older one. Those points can then be redeemed, knocking some cash off a subsequent GM purchase. Meanwhile, Honda previewed “Dream Drive” at the recent Consumer Electronics Show — a concept with its own redeemable points system (one that incorporates some potentially unsettling gamification within the app).

While Ford’s FordPass-based efforts appeared similar, it wasn’t until this month’s North American Dealers Association (NADA) meeting that the automaker was willing to flesh it out.

According to Automotive News, Ford’s rewards system includes “complimentary maintenance,” though it hasn’t yet pinned down everything that will entail. Customers who sign up will also receive $210 in service credits at their local dealership. Beyond that, they will have to (you guessed it) earn points via specific actions. These actions will likely include buying a new car, spending cash at the service center, or forking it over via on-board purchases. Points can be transferred and redeemed at other dealerships for discounts and rewards, with Ford covering the cost.

“When we did all the data analytics, it became really clear: A loyal owner is so much easier for us to do business with than trying to get a customer from someone else,” Jim Farley, Ford’s president of global markets, told dealers during a meet in Las Vegas in October. “It was a big ‘aha’ moment for us.”

Expected to launch in April, it seems Ford isn’t finished tweaking its new program. As of now, the company hasn’t shown how the rewards will be incorporated into FordPass or how points will be doled out to participants. However, Automotive News claims dealers seem just as excited by the prospect as Ford’s vice president of marketing, sales and service, Mark LaNeve.

“Dealers really get the importance of customer experience,” LaNeve said. “This program will marry customers to the dealership.”

As excited as dealerships may be about Ford’s rewards program, we’re not nearly as optimistic that they’ll cheer the company’s other big NADA announcement: insisting that standalone showrooms are an essential aspect of Lincoln’s future.

Automakers are steadfast in their belief that upgrading dealerships to separate showrooms for high-end nameplates, like Lincoln, from pedestrian brands, like Ford, are a key component in ensuring success. However, even before Cadillac’s Project Pinnacle stirred up controversy, many upscale dealerships worried the incurred costs wouldn’t be worth it. The outcry grew in volume ever since, forcing General Motors to repeatedly soften its plan. The issue isn’t so much that the changes won’t bring in new customers, but that dealers won’t be able to recoup the money spent on renovations or lost during the accompanying downtime.

With this in mind, Ford took a more cautious approach. The automaker is trying to prove to dealers that remodeling is worth it in the long run while abstaining from pushing too hard, fearful of the same backlash endured by its rivals. In fact, Ford pressed pause on the program after dealers expressed concerns.

While the company intends to keep pushing for separate Lincoln and Ford showrooms, it won’t make any final decisions until after it meets with its dealer council this March. If it faces too much resistance, expect Ford to adjust expectations to better suit dealer needs. However, we’ve heard nothing about the company having any interest in abandoning the program outright.

[Image: Ford Motor Co.]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 49 comments
  • Dividebytube Dividebytube on Jan 29, 2019

    The local Lincoln dealership used to be a Lincoln-Mercury, now they're a Lincoln-Infiniti. The two buildings are separate but they share the same lot.

  • Jack4x Jack4x on Jan 29, 2019

    Yeah, we couldn't possibly have a $35k MKC customer forced to share dealership space with the plebes buying a $90K F450 Platinum or $75K GT500, could we?

    • See 1 previous
    • SaulTigh SaulTigh on Jan 29, 2019

      Nobody seems to care that the S-Class and G-Wagen share the same lot where the guy from "Bobs HVAC Repair" comes to buy a white van with no windows. Just sayin'.

  • ToolGuy This thing here is interesting.For example, I can select "Historical" and "EV stock" and "Cars" and "USA" and see how many BEVs and PHEVs were on U.S. roads from 2010 to 2023."EV stock share" is also interesting. Or perhaps you prefer "EV sales share".If you are in the U.S., whatever you do, do not select "World" in the 'Region' dropdown. It might blow your small insular mind. 😉
  • ToolGuy This podcast was pretty interesting. I listened to it this morning, and now I am commenting. Listened to the podcast, now commenting on the podcast. See how this works? LOL.
  • VoGhost If you want this to succeed, enlarge the battery and make the vehicle in Spartanburg so you buyers get the $7,500 discount.
  • Jeff Look at the the 65 and 66 Pontiacs some of the most beautiful and well made Pontiacs. 66 Olds Toronado and 67 Cadillac Eldorado were beautiful as well. Mercury had some really nice looking cars during the 60s as well. The 69 thru 72 Grand Prix were nice along with the first generation of Monte Carlo 70 thru 72. Midsize GM cars were nice as well.The 69s were still good but the cheapening started in 68. Even the 70s GMs were good but fit and finish took a dive especially the interiors with more plastics and more shared interiors.
  • Proud2BUnion I typically recommend that no matter what make or model you purchase used, just assure that is HAS a prior salvage/rebuilt title. Best "Bang for your buck"!
Next