2019 Ram 1500 Aces Crash Tests, Stymied by Headlights

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

You win some, you lose some. For Fiat Chrysler, the new Ram 1500 represents more of a win, both in terms of quality, drive experience, and especially crash ratings, which just rolled in from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.

The previous-generation 1500 lost marks in two areas: driver-side small-overlap front impacts (a weakness it shares with FCA’s rear-drive passenger cars) and roof strength. Both of these tests earned the 2018 1500 a “marginal” rating from the IIHS, sinking its overall score. FCA engineers clearly did their homework — the new truck aced all crash tests. Too bad about those peepers, though.

Announced Thursday, the 2019 Ram 1500 relegates those marginal ratings to the past, scoring a “good” rating in all six IIHS crash tests.

“The new Ram 1500 also earns a good rating in the passenger-side small overlap test,” the IIHS said. “The previous version hadn’t been tested for passenger-side protection. Both small overlap ratings apply to trucks built after July, when the cab mounts to the vehicle frame were improved.”

The previous-gen Ram showed its age when stacked up against competing domestic pickups; its roof strength was the worst tested in its segment. Now there’s accolades all around, and the institute provided a further nod for Ram’s optional front crash prevention system. “In IIHS track tests at 12 mph and 25 mph, the vehicle avoided a crash,” the institute stated.

Unfortunately for FCA, engineers didn’t work magic on the Ram’s headlights, which earn the same marginal rating as last year’s model. This keeps the new 1500 out of the running for the highly marketable IIHS Top Safety Pick award. (It’s certainly not alone in the foiled-by-lights camp — headlamp performance is generally quite bad. Maybe proposed changes to federal rules will help things.)

For a back-to-back comparison of old and new Ram 1500 generations, here’s the tests for your viewing enjoyment.

[Images: IIHS]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 13 comments
  • Ar_ken Ar_ken on Nov 08, 2018

    The same test that Volvo aced with its 10 year old design back then? (Although passenger side was not tested,but still...) VERY impressive there FCA....

    • MLS MLS on Nov 09, 2018

      What's that supposed to mean? Ram meets most stringent current standards. What more do you want?

  • Marmot Marmot on Nov 09, 2018

    Ram accomplished this in one year, while the Toyota 4-Runner has had bad crash results for many years and nothing has been done. Same with Tundra, and now the Sienna has been found lacking. What is Toyota thinking?

  • ToolGuy This thing here is interesting.For example, I can select "Historical" and "EV stock" and "Cars" and "USA" and see how many BEVs and PHEVs were on U.S. roads from 2010 to 2023."EV stock share" is also interesting. Or perhaps you prefer "EV sales share".If you are in the U.S., whatever you do, do not select "World" in the 'Region' dropdown. It might blow your small insular mind. 😉
  • ToolGuy This podcast was pretty interesting. I listened to it this morning, and now I am commenting. Listened to the podcast, now commenting on the podcast. See how this works? LOL.
  • VoGhost If you want this to succeed, enlarge the battery and make the vehicle in Spartanburg so you buyers get the $7,500 discount.
  • Jeff Look at the the 65 and 66 Pontiacs some of the most beautiful and well made Pontiacs. 66 Olds Toronado and 67 Cadillac Eldorado were beautiful as well. Mercury had some really nice looking cars during the 60s as well. The 69 thru 72 Grand Prix were nice along with the first generation of Monte Carlo 70 thru 72. Midsize GM cars were nice as well.The 69s were still good but the cheapening started in 68. Even the 70s GMs were good but fit and finish took a dive especially the interiors with more plastics and more shared interiors.
  • Proud2BUnion I typically recommend that no matter what make or model you purchase used, just assure that is HAS a prior salvage/rebuilt title. Best "Bang for your buck"!
Next