Will Robot Cars Make Jaywalking Legal? Maybe, But There's a Cost

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

A report released this week suggests that if self-driving cars become our new normal, it may mean you can jaywalk with impunity again. As if New Yorkers, Chicagoans, and residents of other major cities don’t do so already.

The National Association of City Transportation Officials, a non-profit with represents cities on issues related to transportation, put out a report this week suggesting cities should allow pedestrians to cross streets anywhere, instead of just crosswalks. The report also says self-driving cars would usually be limited to 20 mph and would be able to use pedestrian-detection technology to slow down or stop in order to avoid hitting folks crossing the road.

“The instinctive human act of walking straight to one’s destination, pejoratively known as ‘jaywalking,’ becomes simply ‘walking,’” writes the authors.

There’s a few issues with this. One, as the linked article notes, is increased travel times as cars move at slower speeds and make frequent stops. Two, even though modern pedestrian-detections systems work well, there’s still a non-zero chance of failure. That could lead to trouble.

Jaywalking was common during the early years of the automobile, but it’s now illegal in most places, though enforcement and obedience of the law vary greatly from city to city.

The report also states that thing could go the other way – an explosion of self-driving cars moving in tandem could make streets so busy that pedestrians will need to use bridges to cross.

What is clear is that at least one author of the report thinks our urban planning over the past century has been poor.

“We have a historic opportunity to reclaim the street and to correct the mistakes of a century of urban planning,” Janette Sadik-Khan, NACTO’s chair and former commissioner of New York City’s transportation department, wrote in the report.

Sure, jaywalking may be legal again someday, but anyone who’s driven in a city knows that many pedestrians already don’t care to follow the law. Maybe they’ll be safer in the future, maybe not, but I giggle a little at the vision of self-driving pods being forced to stop every half-block.

[Image: Stock Photo]

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 17 comments
  • David Dennis David Dennis on Nov 05, 2017

    If self-driving cars are limited to 20mph in most situations, I would think few would use their self-driving capability. Why would you turn it on if the result was that you'd go even slower?

    • SunnyvaleCA SunnyvaleCA on Nov 06, 2017

      You'll set self-driving just to deal with the excruciating slowness of the self-driving car in front of you. I envision extreme traffic gridlock and, likely, actual deadlock from time to time. Fortunately for the rest of the country, silicon valley or some other "progressive" area will probably experience the downside of self-driving cars first and will (hopefully) be able to correct course in time.

  • Marko Marko on Nov 06, 2017

    Lots of problems with this. 1. What happens when there is a large fire truck or ambulance driving 50 mph down the street? Those can't exactly stop on a dime in dry weather, let alone in icy weather. If everyone will be taking for granted texting and listening to music with the volume turned up on their headphones, will we "giggle a little at the vision of" pedestrians lying there wounded or worse every half-block? 2. The aforementioned problem for the elderly. It irks me that these so-called "urban planners" vomiting these "studies" up assume everyone is young and able-bodied. 3. Expanding upon #1 and #2, what if someone if injured and lying in the middle of the street? Will "pedestrian detection" be of any use then?

  • MaintenanceCosts Poorly packaged, oddly proportioned small CUV with an unrefined hybrid powertrain and a luxury-market price? Who wouldn't want it?
  • MaintenanceCosts Who knows whether it rides or handles acceptably or whether it chews up a set of tires in 5000 miles, but we definitely know it has a "mature stance."Sounds like JUST the kind of previous owner you'd want…
  • 28-Cars-Later Nissan will be very fortunate to not be in the Japanese equivalent of Chapter 11 reorganization over the next 36 months, "getting rolling" is a luxury (also, I see what you did there).
  • MaintenanceCosts RAM! RAM! RAM! ...... the child in the crosswalk that you can't see over the hood of this factory-lifted beast.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Yes all the Older Land Cruiser’s and samurai’s have gone up here as well. I’ve taken both vehicle ps on some pretty rough roads exploring old mine shafts etc. I bought mine right before I deployed back in 08 and got it for $4000 and also bought another that is non running for parts, got a complete engine, drive train. The mice love it unfortunately.
Next