Nissan Pivots, Stops Cracking the Sales Whip

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

From the depths of the recession to 2016, Nissan’s U.S. volume doubled — from a six-year low of just over 689,000 vehicles in 2009 to over 1.4 million last year. Not a bad track record for any automaker.

However, as the sales landscape cools off after the post-recession boom, Nissan’s new leader feels it’s a better idea to hold a steady course, rather than gunning the sales throttles to meet a pre-selected sales target. In fact, those targets are now a thing of the past.

Chasing arbitrary numbers isn’t in new Nissan CEO Hiroto Saikawa’s interest, Automotive News reports. If there’s growth left in Nissan’s operations, he’d prefer it be smart growth.

“We are not going to raise numerical objectives to stretch ourselves,” Saikawa said last week. “The theme now is steady growth and maintaining a certain level of profitability.”

Under the steely gaze of Carlos Ghosn, who stepped away from the top post at the end of March, Nissan’s regional divisions — the U.S. especially — worked tirelessly to meet long-term sales targets. Starting in 2011, Ghosn sought a 10-percent U.S. market share for the automaker by the end of the first quarter of 2017. Nissan finished that quarter with 10.2 of the American market in its fold.

While the company’s workforce pulled it off, Ghosn’s plan didn’t win him many fans among Nissan dealers. Incentivization for the sale of volume turned off some analysts.

You won’t find such ambition in Saikawa’s recently unveiled six-year plan. However, top Nissan brass aren’t about to bad-mouth the previous CEO’s practices. The company’s North American chairman, Jose Munoz, claims the push for 10 percent was a good thing.

“I’m not going to tell you there was absolutely no pressure, but in reality, we have not been trying to achieve a number ‘no matter what,'” Munoz told Automotive News. “This is really huge growth.”

There’s still room for growth in the American market, Munoz feels, but ensuring the company sits on a solid financial footing is the more important goal in the near future.

“For the United States, we are going to go for steady, profitable growth,” Munoz said. “So we still plan for growth, but without a number as an objective in terms of percentage of growth or percentage of market share. But rather ensuring that the level of operation is really solid.”

Over the first 10 months of 2017, Nissan brand sales in the U.S. rose six-tenths of one percent, with October sales rising 10.2 percent, year-over-year. The automaker’s premium brand, Infiniti, has seen sales rise nearly 15 percent, year-to-date, with October sales down 8 percent compared to a year previous.

[Image: Nissan]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 5 comments
  • Sounds like Nissan may be getting ready to cut off the sub-600 beacon crowd...

    • Whynot Whynot on Nov 13, 2017

      With their stake in Mitsubishi they can just use them for that crowd now.

  • Higheriq Higheriq on Nov 13, 2017

    Nissan's success confirms that there MANY buyers who really don't care how their vehicle drives, or that they're buying throwaway cars.

  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next