Let's Go All the Way: Chevrolet Bolt Increases Its Lead Over Faltering Volt

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Never mind competing with EVs from other manufacturers. With each passing month, it becomes ever clearer that the all-electric Chevrolet Bolt competes directly with another General Motors stablemate: the Chevrolet Volt.

In October 2017, the Bolt — first sold last December and available nationwide since mid-summer — pushed into second place out of all plug-in vehicles sold in the United States, muscling out the Tesla Model X in the process. In doing so, it increased the sales gap between it and the range-extended Volt.

When buyers hit up a “dinosaur” legacy automaker for a green car, it seems they prefer going all the way — once-revolutionary gas generator be damned.

GM sold 2,781 Bolts in October, double the 1,362 Volts bought by U.S. consumers. The Bolt’s strongest sales month so far also edged it ahead of the Volt in year-to-date sales — 17,083, to the Volt’s 16,710 (a 9.8 percent decrease from 2016).

The Volt, which spawned a longer-ranged second generation for the 2016 model year, saw its sales drop 37.8 percent compared to October 2016. Year-over-year sales have dropped for seven consecutive months. The crossover point for both models was in July, when the Bolt’s increased availability propelled it past its dual-motor cousin.

If past Volt sales are any indication, green vehicle purchases ramp up towards the end of the calendar year. December is traditionally the Volt’s best sales month — you can thank visions of a juicy $7,500 tax credit for that.

With attention swinging from the former green showpiece to the new kid on the block, GM is more preoccupied with paring down inflated Volt inventories. At the start of October, the automaker had a 102-day supply of Volts which, combined with plummeting sales of its full-sized passenger cars, led to the decision to idle its Hamtramck assembly plant for the rest of the year. A full shutdown is scheduled for November 13th.

GM executives are no doubt smiling after hearing that Tesla has pushed back its production goals for the Bolt’s main competitor, the Model 3. With the long-anticipated Tesla slow to come off the line, and with early examples arriving as pricier Long Range models, the Bolt can wave its $37,495 MSRP and 238-mile range at would-be buyers with impunity.

Still, the Bolt’s success comes at the expense of the Volt. Speaking to Wards Auto, Buzz Smith of Classic Chevrolet in Grapevine, Texas, claims he’s seen Volt sales fall 60 percent since the Bolt’s release. It’s not just new-to-the-brand buyers kicking the tires on a Bolt.

“Some of them even timed the expiration of their Volt lease to coincide with the Bolt launch,” Smith said.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 34 comments
  • Colin42 Colin42 on Nov 02, 2017

    So far I'm not seeing large incentives for the Volt. In my area it's only $500. Not even close enough to perk my interest.

  • Jerome10 Jerome10 on Nov 03, 2017

    I still will never get why the Bolt is more popular....other than CUV!!!!! But lets say same form factor, I'd pick the Volt 100% of the time. Who wants range anxiety? And I'm a little skeptical of sales numbers on EVs. So many incentives and tax kickbacks and garbage like California HOV access and "free" work charging etc etc. This is not a natural sales market.

  • Brandon I would vote for my 23 Escape ST-Line with the 2.0L turbo and a normal 8 speed transmission instead of CVT. 250 HP, I average 28 MPG and get much higher on trips and get a nice 13" sync4 touchscreen. It leaves these 2 in my dust literally
  • JLGOLDEN When this and Hornet were revealed, I expected BOTH to quickly become best-sellers for their brands. They look great, and seem like interesting and fun alternatives in a crowded market. Alas, ambitious pricing is a bridge too far...
  • Zerofoo Modifications are funny things. I like the smoked side marker look - however having seen too many cars with butchered wire harnesses, I don't buy cars with ANY modifications. Pro-tip - put the car back to stock before you try and sell it.
  • JLGOLDEN I disagree with the author's comment on the current Murano's "annoying CVT". Murano's CVT does not fake shifts like some CVTs attempt, therefore does not cause shift shock or driveline harshness while fumbling between set ratios. Murano's CVT feels genuinely smooth and lets the (great-sounding V6) engine sing and zing along pleasantly.
  • JLGOLDEN Our family bought a 2012 Murano AWD new, and enjoyed it for 280K before we sold it last month. CVT began slipping at 230K but it was worth fixing a clean, well-cared for car. As soon as we sold the 2012, I grabbed a new 2024 Murano before the body style and powertrain changes for 2025, and (as rumored) goes to 4-cyl turbo. Sure, the current Murano feels old-school, with interior switchgear and finishes akin to a 2010 Infiniti. That's not a bad thing! Feels solid, V6 sounds awesome, and the whole platform has been around long enough that future parts & service wont be an issue.
Next