2018 Nissan Altima Prices Rise Slightly as Nissan Adds Equipment, Prepares a 2019 Challenger for Camry and Accord

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

Bolstered in its fight against all-new editions of key rivals from Toyota and Honda with the standard fitment of automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning, the 2018 Nissan Altima’s price rises by only $240 compared with the outgoing model.

The base 2018 Nissan Altima 2.5 S rises a few ticks above $24K to $24,025, including destination and handling charges. The Altima continues with a 179-horsepower 2.5-liter four-cylinder linked to a continuously variable transmission.

Given the era in which we live, it’s not surprising to see a more significant price increase for the lone remaining V6 model — the sportier 3.5 SR is dead.

Nissan reserves its 270-horsepower 3.5-liter V6 for the top-tier SL trim. Switching from the 2.5 SL to the 3.5 SL requires a $4,515 leap, one that’s accompanied by a handful of additional features such as NissanConnect and adaptive cruise. The least costly V6-engined Altima you can get in 2018 will now cost $34,395, $520 more than last year. For MY2017, the least costly V6 Altima was the 3.5 SR at $28,825. That car’s sportier suspension tune, with larger stabilizer bars and unique damper setup and 20-percent less body roll, is now reserved for the four-cylinder 2.5 SL.

V6-engined 2018 Toyota Camrys are priced from $35,295. Pricing for the new 2018 Honda Accord’s 2.0T has not yet been announced — the outgoing 2017 Honda Accord’s EX-L V6 is priced at $31,870.

Blessed by a high degree of daily rental fleet desirability, the Nissan Altima continues to be America’s third-best-selling midsize car, but even before the new editions of Camry and Accord began to garner headlines, the Altima was beginning to fall further and further behind. Through the first eight months of 2016, the Altima trailed the second-ranked Accord by only 14,125 sales, roughly an 1,800-sale gap per month. In 2017, the Altima has generated 4,700 fewer monthly sales than the Accord, on average.

Nissan is on track in 2017 to sell 260,000 Altimas in America, a seven-year low. The Altima’s 16-percent year-over-year decline is only slightly better than the 17-percent drop experienced by the midsize category as a whole. 2018 is the sixth model year for the fifth-generation Altima. The 2019 Altima is expected to inherit many of the latest Maxima’s design cues.

Beyond the removal of a base Altima 2.5 (non-S) that was priced for MY2017 at $23,335 and the 3.5 SR’s discontinuation, the 2018 Altima range includes the $25,085 Altima 2.5 SR, the $26,670 Altima 2.5 SV, and the $29,880 Altima 2.5 SL. Options on the base Altima 2.5 S include $690 16-inch alloy wheels and a $390 Convenience Package. At the top end, top-spec Altima 3.5 SL maxes out at $35,935 with special paint, a rear spoiler, and assorted minor add-ons.

[Image: Nissan]

Timothy Cain is a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Autofocus.ca and the founder and former editor of GoodCarBadCar.net. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars and Instagram.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 42 comments
  • APaGttH APaGttH on Sep 26, 2017

    The Nissan Altima 2017 is the equivalent of GM W-body rental lot fodder circa 2007. Soulless, just good enough to be reliable during rental duty, cheap, somewhat underpowered, and just all around, "blah." No I'm not a Nissan hater - I had a Maxima as a rental earlier this year and I absolutely do not understand the B&B hatred for the Nissan full-sizer. I found it to be an outstanding car.

  • Delta88 Delta88 on Sep 26, 2017

    I feel like Nissan has picked right up where Pontiac left off. The Altima is a Japanese '08 Grand Prix. But with a worse drive train.

  • Slavuta Motor Trend"Although the interior appears more upscale, sit in it a while and you notice the grainy plastics and conventional design. The doors sound tinny, the small strip of buttons in the center stack flexes, and the rear seats are on the firm side (but we dig the ability to recline). Most frustrating were the repeated Apple CarPlay glitches that seemed to slow down the apps running through it."
  • Brandon I would vote for my 23 Escape ST-Line with the 2.0L turbo and a normal 8 speed transmission instead of CVT. 250 HP, I average 28 MPG and get much higher on trips and get a nice 13" sync4 touchscreen. It leaves these 2 in my dust literally
  • JLGOLDEN When this and Hornet were revealed, I expected BOTH to quickly become best-sellers for their brands. They look great, and seem like interesting and fun alternatives in a crowded market. Alas, ambitious pricing is a bridge too far...
  • Zerofoo Modifications are funny things. I like the smoked side marker look - however having seen too many cars with butchered wire harnesses, I don't buy cars with ANY modifications. Pro-tip - put the car back to stock before you try and sell it.
  • JLGOLDEN I disagree with the author's comment on the current Murano's "annoying CVT". Murano's CVT does not fake shifts like some CVTs attempt, therefore does not cause shift shock or driveline harshness while fumbling between set ratios. Murano's CVT feels genuinely smooth and lets the (great-sounding V6) engine sing and zing along pleasantly.
Next