AOTD: We're Not Going Anywhere, Mitsubishi Says

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

“People keep asking if we’re going to go away,” Mitsubishi Motors North America COO Don Swearingen told reporters earlier this month.

“We’re not.”

Seemingly anticipating yesterday’s TTAC QOTD — Does Mitsubishi Need To Exist? — Swearingen was defending Mitsubishi’s approach to the North American market following the automaker’s partial takeover by its Nissan compatriot.

Renault-Nissan boss Carlos Ghosn claimed the Mitsubishi chairmanship in October after spending $2.3 billion in exchange for 34 percent of the company’s automobile manufacturing business.

Three months later, The Detroit Bureau reports, Mitsubishi North America’s Swearingen said, “We are separate companies and will remain competitors.”

Already, Mitsubishi has decided to kill off its lone C-segment car, the Lancer, and there is apparently no intention to replace the Lancer with a rebadged Nissan Sentra.

Long dead, the Galant nameplate likely has no future as some sort of next-gen Altima twin. “We are focusing on a narrow model range of mainly SUVs,” Mitsubishi’s Osamu Masuko said in late 2015, prior to the rapid decline of America’s midsize market in 2016.

Rather, Mitsubishi intends to fill a gap early next year between the Outlander and Outlander Sport with “the best vehicle Mitsubishi has ever produced,” Swearingen says. Given the timetable, this vehicle can’t possibly be a shared effort with Nissan. Indeed, Mitsubishi design planner Kazou Yana wants Mitsubishi to now be more distinct from Nissan.

Mitsubishi and Nissan instead look forward to the long-term benefits of saving money on purchasing and logistics, The Detroit Bureau reported earlier this month.

We therefore can’t look forward to three-diamond-badged variants of the Maxima, Murano, Pathfinder, Titan, Armada, and GT-R, not that you were looking forward to such vehicles. But Mitsubishi points to its own increasing success in the U.S. market and the company’s strength in the utility vehicle sector as a harbinger of success. While a long ways from the 345,111 new vehicles sold by the automaker in America 15 years ago, 2016’s 96,267-unit performance nevertheless represented an eight-year high for Mitsubishi in the U.S.

2016 was Mitsubishi’s fourth consecutive year of growth. Since the depths of the recession in 2009, Mitsubishi’s U.S. volume has risen 78 percent in a market that grew 68 percent during the same time period. (Mitsubishi Canada’s 2016 sales were only 411 sales shy of the brand’s all-time record set two years ago.)

Signs of rude health? Not exactly. Mitsubishi’s U.S. market share is now at 0.55 percent, down from 2.05 percent in 2002.

But the downturn appears to be over. If Mitsubishi dealers could get the pickup truck they so desire, if Mitsubishi could finally live up to its Outlander plug-in promises, and if next year’s small utility vehicle arrives on time, maybe then we’ll stop asking questions about the brand’s North American viability.

Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures. Follow on Twitter @goodcarbadcar and on Facebook.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 44 comments
  • Brettc Brettc on Jan 20, 2017

    Where I live, there is a Mitsubishi dealer and a Subaru dealer beside each other and both are owned by the same company with connecting parking lots. Tons of turnover on the Subaru lot, but look about 500 feet to the left and the same Outlanders and Outlander Sports just sit there and sit there.

  • Bd2 Bd2 on Jan 22, 2017

    Unlike Isuzu, in this crossover/SUV/pick-up driven market, Mitsu might be able to survive without a lineup of sedans, but they would still need competitive products and the biggest cost-drivers are platform and power-train development, which Mitsu continually falls behind with, which would only get worse as there is the need to develop a hybrid, PHEV and EV, if not invest in things like fuel cell in order to "future-proof" oneself. Mitsu Motors does not have the resources to do all that and they don't have enough sales in other markets to support the development of mid-large crossover models that sell well in the US. Ghosn is not known as the "cost-cutter" for no reason, so as Longshift stated above, eventually will likely see a Hyundai-Kia relationship (except maybe limited to crossovers, SUVs and maybe a pick-up). Just as well as Mitsu already sells both variants (regular and LWB) of the Infiniti Q70 in Japan as the Mitsu Proudia and Dignity. An interesting note about the Proudia and Dignity - the 1st gen models were developed in conjunction with Hyundai and were also sold as the 1st gen Equus/Centennial.

  • Redapple2 jeffbut they dont want to ... their pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. More truck profit than the other 3. Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = 2x ford total @ $15,000 profit per. Tons o $ to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire
  • Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
Next