QOTD: Does Mitsubishi Need to Exist?

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

Thinking back to just over a decade ago, Mitsubishi was still in the full-line automaker business. For most needs, there existed an option at your Mitsubishi dealer, which then was a place with functioning lighting and definitely not a former Pizza Hut or Carl’s Jr.

But that’s all changed now, and it has me wondering — is there really a point to Mitsubishi, you know, being a thing?

Circa mid-2000s, Mitsubishi had some volume Diamond Star Motors options for better or for worse: the Galant midsize and the Eclipse, which was, of course, a certified sports car. There was the Lancer, Lancer Evolution, and Lancer Sportback. There was also the Diamante, a midsize Lexus ES300 competitor. (LOL!) Mitsubishi also sold one of my favorite unibody SUVs: the full-size, optionally two-tone Montero, and its younger trucky sibling, the Montero Sport. A couple of crossovers beefed up the 4WD offerings in the Outlander and Endeavor. Mitsubishi also once again had a Raider, which was actually a Dakota. We don’t need to think much about that one. The point is, I count 11 model offerings if we’re being generous, and that’s a full line.

Move forward to present day, and almost all of that is gone. Here’s the current Mitsubishi lineup:

i-MiEV (the all-electric disaster)

Mirage/Mirage Sedan (G4)

Lancer (dead)

Outlander Sport

Outlander

And that’s it: four vehicles. There’s no midsize sedan, no luxury options, no real SUV, no coupe. You can have a subcompact in electric or gasoline, and a compact CUV or a near-midsize CUV, which runs on premium fuel if you opt for the underpowered V6.

The dealers? Surely they haven’t changed much, right? Well, here’s what Google showed me when I searched up my local Cincinnati Mitsubishi dealer, Kerry Mitsubishi. I didn’t realize how much the Outlander was cribbing on Econoline styling these days.

We all know the story of how Nissan announced it would spent $2.2 billion to acquire a controlling stake in Mitsubishi via a bulk shares purchase in May of last year. Nissan CEO Carlos Ghosn said big things are in the works for this new Nissan and Mitsubishi “alliance,” as it were.

But I’m here questioning whether all that’s really necessary. As we see above, the Mitsubishi dealer network is in a state of … let’s say disrepair. The model lineup is Swiss cheese. And the kind of customer the brand attracts is generally already served by Nissan. Speaking of, all of Mitsubishi’s models are already duplicated entirely by the Nissan lineup. The LEAF, Versa, Juke/Rogue, Murano — and there you go, Nissan has replaced all the Mitsubishis.

So rather than bother with trying to save and re-energize this brand in North America, I’m thinking it’s not worth the trouble. Pare down the models over the next few years and replace them with Nissan badge jobs if necessary. Or perhaps just offer an incentive to visit the Nissan dealer down the street when current Mitsubishi customers are ready for a new ride. It’s a win-win, as Nissan can simultaneously sell more Nissan vehicles while trimming a bit of excess baggage.

Maybe I’m missing some grand design or cost savings somewhere. Doubtless, one of you B&B can show me my error, or some proof that a new Montero is on the way to US shores, in which case I might reconsider.

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 113 comments
  • RHD RHD on Jan 20, 2017

    That silver Lancer wagon bears a huge resemblance to the Volvo V70/Cross Country wagons, kind of an 8/10 reproduction. Has this been borne out anywhere? It's either perfectly logical or "weirdly coincidental" copying, since Mitsubishi partnered with Volvo in Europe for a while in the 90's. Mitsubishi has been in bed with so many car companies over the years, it's no wonder they get sick every now and again.

  • Ddrap14 Ddrap14 on Feb 12, 2017

    They still sell the Montero and the L200 in Australia, as well as the Pajero Sport and, seemingly, the Lancer.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next