Pagani Huayra Airbag Waiver Denied: No US Sales Until 2015?

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

NHTSA has denied the niche supercar maker Pagani a waiver for advanced airbag requirements for its new Huayra, possibly forcing the Italian firm to delay US sales until 2015. According to the Federal Register[ PDF], Pagani

estimated that if the requested exemption were granted, it would sell 35 to 45 vehicles per year, 6 to 12 vehicles of which would be sold in the United States…. [Pagani] submitted projections estimating that if the petition for exemption is denied and no vehicles are sold in the United States, the company would make an estimated €5,398,000 in net income during the period of 2011 through 2014, compared to €8,613,000 in net income during the same period if an exemption were granted. The company asserted that the difference in gross revenue between granting and denying the exemption is approximately €34,000,000, and the financial records indicate a difference in projected net income of approximately €3,215,000.

Although Pagani has realized profits in recent years, the company asserted that immediate compliance with the advanced air bag requirements will cause substantial economic hardship. Specifically, Pagani stated that the company only operates on the cash on hand without lines of credit or debt financing, and its small profit margin is necessary to guard it from market fluctuations. Pagani stated that without an exemption, it will not be able to fund the advanced air bag program, which is estimated as costing €4,000,000, from its non-U.S. sales and will not be able to enter the U.S. market until at least 2015.

Finally, Pagani stated that its production capacity is currently limited to approximately 25 units per year worldwide. The company indicated that its plan is to expand its production capacity to 50 to 60 units per year worldwide by building a new factory. However, the company stated that the new factory represents a significant investment for the company and could not be justified without the revenue from U.S. sales. Accordingly, construction of this new facility cannot begin unless an exemption is granted.

So let’s see: the company hopes to build 60 units per year, stands to lose nearly $50m in gross revenue and nearly half it’s net profit if the request is denied, and will lose access to a huge market for four years… why doesn’t the government count this as a “hardship”? Is NHTSA really that concerned about protecting the handful of bajillionaires who will be buying the $1.4m Huayra and likely keeping them at a track anyway? The problem: it turns out that Tesla, which enjoyed a waiver for years while receiving tens of millions in taxpayer-backed loans, has ruined the waiver for everyone. According to NHTSA’s post-Tesla change of heart:

low volume manufacturers now have access to advanced air bag technology. Accordingly, NHTSA tentatively concludes that the expense of advanced air bag technology is not now sufficient, in and of itself, to justify the grant of a petition for a hardship exemption from the advanced air bag requirements

Oh well, nobody’s going to miss one of the coolest, most exclusive, most jaw-dropping cars in the world for a few years, while Pagani installs advanced airbags. American bajillionaires just love to be last in line for the new hotness…

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
 5 comments
  • Sitting@home Sitting@home on Aug 05, 2011

    For every law there's a loophole, and the richer you are the bigger the loophole. I'm sure if a bajillionaire wants one of these so he can cruise for young ladies outside Hollywood nightclubs while his wife is away at a starvation spa, then there will be a way to get it. Couldn't he import the car in kit form and get some desperate car guy he knows (say the CEO of GM) to build it for him ? Maybe he could pick one up when his yacht drops anchor in Monte Carlo and bring it back over here as a personal possession.

  • ClutchCarGo ClutchCarGo on Aug 05, 2011

    "why doesn’t the government count this as a “hardship”?" Because if you give an adv airbag waiver to one $1.4M supercar mfr, every $1.4M supercar mfr will want one, too. Seriously, tho, they can't license somebody else's adv airbag technology for less than 4M euros?

    • See 2 previous
    • Joeaverage Joeaverage on Oct 25, 2011

      @roamer Tinn-Cann -> EXACTLY!!! I'm tired of the federal nanny rules.

  • Buickman I was called crazy after predicting the sale of GMAC.#canthurtme
  • 3-On-The-Tree Another observation during my time as a firefighter EMT was that seatbelts and helmets do save lives and reduce injury. And its always the other person getting hurt.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Jeff, Matt Posky, When my bike came out in 1999 it was the fastest production motorcycle in the world, 150 HP 197 top speed, 9.57 quarter mile Hayabusa peregrine falcon etc. This led to controversy and calls for high-speed motorcycles to be banned in order to avoid increasingly fast bikes from driving on public roads. This led to a mutual decision nicknamed the “ gentleman’s agreement” to limit bikes to 186mph, ending the production bike speed contest for all bikes 2000 and upward. Honestly once your over a buck 20 it’s all a blur. Most super cars can do over or close to 200mpg, I know at least on paper my 09 C6 corvette LS3 tops out at 190mph.
  • 3-On-The-Tree In my life before the military I was a firefighter EMT and for the majority of the car accidents that we responded to ALCOHOL and drugs was the main factor. All the suggested limitations from everyone above don’t matter if there is a drunken/high fool behind the wheel. Again personal responsibility.
  • Wjtinfwb NONE. Vehicle tech is not the issue. What is the issue is we give a drivers license to any moron who can fog a mirror. Then don't even enforce that requirement or the requirement to have auto insurance is you have a car. The only tech I could get behind is to override the lighting controls so that headlights and taillights automatically come on at dusk and in sync with wipers. I see way too many cars after dark without headlights, likely due to the automatic control being overridden and turned to "Off". The current trend of digital or electro-luminescent dashboards exacerbates this as the dash is illuminated, fooling a driver into thinking the headlights are on.
Next