BYD Charges Ahead

by Edward Niedermeyer

Published: March 15th, 2010

Chinese battery maker and aspiring automaker BYD earned $215m in the fourth quarter of 2009, bringing its net profit for last year to $555.2m, reports Automotive News [sub]. BYD’s performance outstripped analyst estimates, which projected fourth quarter profits of $130.5m, and full-year profits of $473.2m. Though the Chinese auto market grew 46 percent to 1.6m vehicles, 47 percent of BYD’s 2009 sales came from the firm’s cell phone battery business, which is expected to give back recent gains as the global economic crisis takes its toll. Not so with BYD’s auto business: the firm has raised its 2010 car sales projections 14 percent, with sales of 800k foreseen. And as China’s car market takes off, BYD, which has one of the nation’s best-selling cars in its F3 compact, is expected to keep growing. Says one JP Morgan analyst:

BYD is a company that can’t be underestimated. If the Chinese vehicle market expands 10 percent this year BYD’s sales will grow at least 40 percent — 50 or even 60 percent is also a possibility.

There’s plenty of room to question the practices that BYD is riding to success. After all, reliance on reverse-engineering and labor-intensive production will only take the firm so far before it has to join the industry in adopting modern production and development practices. In the meantime, the Chinese firm is building on its domestic-market success by prepping its F3DM hybrid and E6 EV for European and US sales. If those vehicles can make headway in mature markets starting next year in Europe, BYD will be well on its way to becoming a global force in the car business.And those plans are moving forward rapidly. The LA Business Journal reports that BYD is shopping for North American headquarters in LA County, and could be looking for a production site as well. Portland, Oregon has also been in the running to host BYD’s US operations. With local governments eager to attract “green-collar” jobs, BYD can expect the red-carpet treatment (and hosts of local tax abatements) as they prepare to bring the fight to the US and European markets.Backed by cash from Warren Buffett and technical cooperation with Daimler and VW, BYD remains the front-runner among Chinese firms who are anxious to back up their domestic-market success with a seat at the table with the global giants. But as with so much that emerges from China, their vehicles are under-tested, and if BYD is pushing for acceptance before its product is ready for prime-time, it could give new life to anti-Chinese-car prejudices. Needless to say, BYD is one of the firms we’ll be watching closely over the next several years.

#BYD #China #Daimler #EV #HighFinance #Hybrid #Profit #Volkswagen #WarrenBuffett

Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments

Join the conversation

3 comments

Dutchchris on Mar 15, 2010

About those new energy vehicles BYD is announcing: don't hold your breath. The BYD F3DM was supposed to be the "world's first mass produced PHEV" way back in December 2008 but few (if any) were ever delivered to customers. According to the Wallstreet Journal the problem is the batteries. Apparently BYD's labour intensive production methods just don't get the right quality for large automotive battery packs: http://www.tinyurl.com.au/2r2

Like Reply
Disaster on Mar 15, 2010

Gotta love the BMWesque BYD logo. http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/2780/dashnl3.jpg http://37signals.com/svn/archives2/chinese_logo_lookalikes_bmw_and_byd.php

Like Reply
- Cole carrera on Mar 15, 2010
  
  It has been changed since.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
Redapple2 Love the wheels
Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.