Opel Workers: Can We Do This Deal Already?

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

GM’s sale of Opel to Magna/Sberbank is being held up by the European Union, which is looking into whether the German government unfairly favored Magna’s bid. But while the interregnum plays out (the EU will decide by November 27th), GM has plenty of time to develop a case of seller’s remorse. After all, GM’s VP for Global Engineering Mark Reuss recently told Autoline After Hours that Opel is completely integrated into GM’s global product development, and that the relationship “won’t change.” Does that, as Business Week’s David Welch asked, mean GM will keep all of Opel’s development capacity while reducing loss exposure to 35 percent? Reuss had to change the subject, but it’s obviously not the case. With Daewoo under fire, GM would clearly prefer to keep Opel’s development capacity integrated, and keep its intellectual property out of the hands of Russian automakers. And with German newspapers reporting that GM’s board is considering a “plan B” to keep Opel within the GM fold, Opel’s workers are threatening to strike.

Ultimately though, it seems that the Magna deal will ultimately go through. The EU is not likely to block the deal for the simple reason that they won’t take over the German government’s interim financing or Magna deal-dependent $6.7b loan. Without this money, Opel would enter bankruptcy, leading to deep cuts in employment across Europe. Meanwhile, Magna has concluded a deal with Opel’s Spanish workers, continuing Magna’s back-away from the deep employment cuts that might have scuppered the deal.

Meanwhile, GM Europe’s Carl-Peter Forster tells Reuters that opposition to the Magna deal on GM’s board is “clearly below 50 percent.” And if you look at the collected arguments for keeping Opel, they are based in regret over giving up development capacity more than anything resembling a strong financial argument for keeping the troubled European division. But when all of the compromising is over, will there a strong financial argument for a Magna-owned Opel? IHS Global Insight’s Tim Urqhart thinks not:

We need to see some serious structural changes at Opel-Vauxhall. Every time Magna talks to the representatives at a plant it comes back with a huge compromise on job losses. At the start of the year there was a general consensus that four out of the 10 plants should go. Now that’s down to probably none, although the Antwerp, Belgium, plant is still under pressure

If Magna can’t restructure Opel to profitability, and if it can’t monetize the Opel intellectual property that GM is fighting to keep out of the Russian industry’s hands, it will be stuck with a losing proposition. It’s looking like it will be a good month before we really understand what Opel IP GM will be able to keep exclusive, and whether Magna-Opel will be a viable proposition. And until a deal is reached, the possibility of an Opel bankruptcy can not be ignored.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 3 comments
  • Steven02 Steven02 on Oct 30, 2009

    Jobs are going to be lost here. It will happen. Germany has been playing a bit a bully ignoring some other bids. I believe GM can still write a letter that would bust the Magna deal if they wanted to, but I don't think the EU has to step in. Germany could get its loan money back immediately and send Opel in to bankruptcy, or it could continue to support Opel and help find another buyer. One of Germany's problem was the loss of jobs that was going to occur under GM's plans to restructure. That is likely going to happen no matter how this shakes out.

  • Bunter1 Bunter1 on Oct 30, 2009

    Jobs in the auto industry have been primed for big losses for a long time. The overcapacity will go down somewhere and it looks like the european and US gov'ts are scrambling to keep it from happening on their turf while not freaking out the World Trade folks. I think the market forces will snuff GMNA and GMyurp no matter what they try, it's to vulnerable and something will have to give. Too big (and dumb) to survive? Bunter

  • Alan My view is there are good vehicles from most manufacturers that are worth looking at second hand.I can tell you I don't recommend anything from the Chrysler/Jeep/Fiat/etc gene pool. Toyotas are overly expensive second hand for what they offer, but they seem to be reliable enough.I have a friend who swears by secondhand Subarus and so far he seems to not have had too many issue.As Lou stated many utes, pickups and real SUVs (4x4) seem quite good.
  • 28-Cars-Later So is there some kind of undiagnosed disease where every rando thinks their POS is actually valuable?83K miles Ok.new valve cover gasket.Eh, it happens with age. spark plugsOkay, we probably had to be kewl and put in aftermarket iridium plugs, because EVO.new catalytic converterUh, yeah that's bad at 80Kish. Auto tranny failing. From the ad: the SST fails in one of the following ways:Clutch slip has turned into; multiple codes being thrown, shifting a gear or 2 in manual mode (2-3 or 2-4), and limp mode.Codes include: P2733 P2809 P183D P1871Ok that's really bad. So between this and the cat it suggests to me someone jacked up the car real good hooning it, because EVO, and since its not a Toyota it doesn't respond well to hard abuse over time.$20,000, what? Pesos? Zimbabwe Dollars?Try $2,000 USD pal. You're fracked dude, park it in da hood and leave the keys in it.BONUS: Comment in the ad: GLWS but I highly doubt you get any action on this car what so ever at that price with the SST on its way out. That trans can be $10k + to repair.
  • 28-Cars-Later Actually Honda seems to have a brilliant mid to long term strategy which I can sum up in one word: tariffs.-BEV sales wane in the US, however they will sell in Europe (and sales will probably increase in Canada depending on how their government proceeds). -The EU Politburo and Canada concluded a trade treaty in 2017, and as of 2024 99% of all tariffs have been eliminated.-Trump in 2018 threatened a 25% tariff on European imported cars in the US and such rhetoric would likely come again should there be an actual election. -By building in Canada, product can still be sold in the US tariff free though USMCA/NAFTA II but it should allow Honda tariff free access to European markets.-However if the product were built in Marysville it could end up subject to tit-for-tat tariff depending on which junta is running the US in 2025. -Profitability on BEV has already been a variable to put it mildly, but to take on a 25% tariff to all of your product effectively shuts you out of that market.
  • Lou_BC Actuality a very reasonable question.
  • Lou_BC Peak rocket esthetic in those taillights (last photo)
Next