Jim Press Is Insane. Still.

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

In a recent interview with AutoObserver, Chrysler’s Jim Press tries desperately to state the case that somehow things could be worse at Auburn Hills. In the process he piles on the layers of denial that keep the smallest Detroit automaker senselessly hanging on. “It’s hard to say things are good when sales were only down 25 percent [retail],” press tells AO’s Michelle Krebs. “That’s terrible, but it’s less terrible than the industry decline of 40 percent.” It’s also less terrible than the 44 percent overall sales drop that ChryCo endured last month, but then the fact that Press only mentions retail sales kind of says it all. Especially considering he made AO’s editors include [retail] in his otherwise misleading (or is that self-deluding?) quote. But, “things aren’t so bad,” concludes Press. “At 80,000 vehicles sold in February, we’re doing OK.” Apparently we will know things are bad when Press starts lying about sales rather than pathologically misrepresenting them.

“Looking at retail in prior months, we did pretty well. We’ve shown we’ve been able to cope in these conditions, particularly since we were the first to lose leasing and the first to encounter the credit situation,” says Press lowering the bar just a little further. Press pimps the “intentional lowering of fleet sales” meme with gusto, despite admitting that Chrysler has more 2008 inventory than its competitors. Which explains why ChryCo’s incentives “look” high, argues Press, who swears that 2009 transaction prices are “pretty much in line with competitors in most cases.” Press completes his assault on reality by disputing Edmunds’ $5,556 per vehicle incentive average without providing an alternative figure.

As “OK” as things are though, Chrysler is not making money at current sales rates, says Press. “No one is making money. That’s not in the cards until we are in a much more normal environment in the marketplace.” Pay no attention to the incentives behind the curtain. But Press is blithely optimistic. “Perhaps the rate of decline [in auto sales] will slow down,” he says. Perhaps Jim, perhaps. “If we get [bailed out],” he continues, “we’re viable and can continue to invest in future. If we get the relationship with Fiat, we’ll go from viable to being in really good shape.” Press’s blithering optimism would be almost heartening in these trying times if it werent so disingenuous and cynical. Unrelenting (and wholly unfounded) optimism is the only thing that can win Chrysler more bailout bucks, and those tax dollars are the only chance Chrysler has at surviving. That Chrysler’s retail sales are only dropping at half the rate of the larger market (and its own overall sales) is hardly “vaibility.” Or cause for optimism.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 29 comments
  • Superbadd75 Superbadd75 on Mar 10, 2009
    I’m not crying for him. He knew (or should have) that Chrysler was in deep trouble when he made the switch. Undoubtedly, his pay package included a huge upside if he was able to save Chrysler. If he can save Chrysler, this guy needs to run for President! I don't think anyone can shine that turd.
  • Dolometh Dolometh on Mar 10, 2009

    i wonder if jim press and bob lutz go to the same tanning salon?

  • Lou_BC They like "western food"?
  • 28-Cars-Later "Inside EVs sent automotive journalist Kevin Williams to the Beijing Auto Show, and Williams walked away feeling like Chinese automakers are, generally speaking, building cars that could come to the States and immediately steal plenty of buyers from American, European, Japanese, and Korean automakers."I doubt this very much because: [list=1][*]Conventional drivetrains are not gonna fly and the Chinese are not going to pay to federalize whatever they're selling in Asia (or they would have by now).[/*][*]Until emissions rules for BEV are drawn up (and I'm sure top men are working on that now) it would be easier to resell BEV Asian market product in the US but you're mostly competing for Tesla owners/fans unless you come in and undercut everyone by 50% or more to grow the market. [/*][/list=1]BEV is not taking off folks, the 7% or so (roughly VWoA, Volvo, and Mazda's historic market share) isn't suddenly going to double or triple at current price to value. If PRC brands were to come in with new commuters at $14,995 and then nickle-and-dime for basic features (i.e. the RyanAir model) its a maybe but they won't. They'll come in 5% under the leaders for MSRP and then wonder why their dealer lots are ghost towns (I'm sure whatever dipsh!t dealer group opens a store for them will add ADM on like clowns too).
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh weird.. nobody wants to be a cop after cops get held accountable.. And no, this has nothing to do with the ''urban myth of defunding'', the funding reductions in this very article come from a reduction in crime during the pandemic (googlze)... and the voting ''people'' of Floridia not allowing funding increases in a vastly right leaning state, and desantis himself rejecting federal funding according to the googlze ... only top have desantis then TAKE covid relief funds from ARPA (also googlze) .. have fun .. wont be reading any replies since this will bring out all the conspiracy theories, secret cabals, gay mice and gay beer book burners
  • The Oracle Seems fruitless, Tesla’s German giga presses will be churning out front & rear chassis/body modules in no time, and in record numbers.
  • Jeff The Chinese automakers have come to other markets but I doubt they will be allowed in the US at least anytime soon. Most of the Chinese plants are newer and more automated than the US plants and they have learned how to build vehicles from the US and other automakers. Its a combination of Chinese Government support for their automakers and that Chinese automakers have improved their quality and have more automated and modern plants. US automakers and others are losing market share to Chinese automakers in the Chinese market.
Next