Spied: 2019 Ram 1500 Limited, Showing Us a Bit More Face

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

(Here at TTAC, we occasionally bring you a piece from a sister publication after determining it hits the right note for our readers. Given that these Off-Road.com spy shots contain a 2019 Ram 1500, and the author is none other than Mr. Matthew Guy, how could we pass it up?)

This year, we’ve seen a few spy shots of the upcoming 2019 Ram 1500. Shutterbugs have now captured what seems to be a test mule of the brand’s fancy-pants Limited trim roaming the salty streets of Michigan.

It’s clearer than ever that the new Ram is going to lose its signature mini-Freightliner look in favor of a more streamlined appearance. A trapezoidal grille is framed by a sleek set of headlamps, with the traditional gunsight ditched in favour of a R A M billboard with chrome whiskers.

Viewed directly from the side, this crew cab looks big. Really big. This could be a result of some visual chicanery thanks to the thick vinyl camouflage, but it sure seems like the upcoming Ram 1500 crew cab will offer its biggest rear passenger compartment to date. It’s not quite in Mega Cab territory but it’s certainly approaching that level.

Six-lug hubs are now a certainty, having appeared on just about every test mule we have seen to date. This model sports six-spoke chrome rims and light-duty tires, very much in keeping with luxurious trims such as the Limited.

Another clue as to this mule’s stature in the Ram 1500 lineup are the tail lights. Much like the current model F-150, the centre of the lens seems to incorporate some sort of sensor such as the ones used for blind-spot monitoring or lane-change systems. Ford deployed these units in the tail lights as they don’t work extremely well with certain types of metal. The Blue Oval’s box is, of course, hewn from aluminum.

Making a leap and reading between the lines – and despite many reports to the contrary – the appearance of these units on the upcoming Ram’s tail lights could point toward the brand moving to aluminium as well … at least for the outer skin of the truck box. The inside of the box could remain constructed of steel.

Taking this approach would help Ram save weight on their new truck. It would also solve the perpetual problem of Ram trucks’ tendency to rust like an anchor over the rear wheel wells (the rear arches on the 2010 Ram owned by this author currently resemble Swiss cheese and have been in such a state for well over a year).

Other details of the Ram 1500 have been firmed up ahead of its debut next year. Coil springs with optional air suspension are likely to continue, as will the RamBox storage solution. New tailgate options could be on the horizon in the form of a 60/40 split unit. A hybrid and turbocharged four-cylinder are possibilities, and a more powerful V8 and Raptor-fighter are also rumored.

Expect the 2019 Ram 1500 to break cover next month at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 26 comments
  • MrIcky MrIcky on Dec 21, 2017

    I'm not seeing the ford thing. I can see the Tundra thing. I know it's for aero, but I dislike the bumpers being faced almost to the grille. Unless this thing gets 25+ mpg because of all this aero crap, I'd rather have more distinctive features.

  • INeon INeon on Dec 22, 2017

    I'm still convinced this is the Chrysler full-size SUV's face.

  • Slavuta Motor Trend"Although the interior appears more upscale, sit in it a while and you notice the grainy plastics and conventional design. The doors sound tinny, the small strip of buttons in the center stack flexes, and the rear seats are on the firm side (but we dig the ability to recline). Most frustrating were the repeated Apple CarPlay glitches that seemed to slow down the apps running through it."
  • Brandon I would vote for my 23 Escape ST-Line with the 2.0L turbo and a normal 8 speed transmission instead of CVT. 250 HP, I average 28 MPG and get much higher on trips and get a nice 13" sync4 touchscreen. It leaves these 2 in my dust literally
  • JLGOLDEN When this and Hornet were revealed, I expected BOTH to quickly become best-sellers for their brands. They look great, and seem like interesting and fun alternatives in a crowded market. Alas, ambitious pricing is a bridge too far...
  • Zerofoo Modifications are funny things. I like the smoked side marker look - however having seen too many cars with butchered wire harnesses, I don't buy cars with ANY modifications. Pro-tip - put the car back to stock before you try and sell it.
  • JLGOLDEN I disagree with the author's comment on the current Murano's "annoying CVT". Murano's CVT does not fake shifts like some CVTs attempt, therefore does not cause shift shock or driveline harshness while fumbling between set ratios. Murano's CVT feels genuinely smooth and lets the (great-sounding V6) engine sing and zing along pleasantly.
Next