Domestic Truck Wars: No One Wants to Finish Last in Detroit

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

There’s a chill in the auto industry that wasn’t present a year ago. Sales are down compared to this time last year, with only a select few automakers posting year-to-date gains. Among members of the Detroit Three, volume loss is the order of the day.

Over the first three months of 2019, Ford sales sank 1.6 percent, General Motors sales declined 7 percent, and Fiat Chrysler volume dropped 3 percent. While the long-predicted slowdown is upon us, rivalry in the lucrative full-size pickup segment has never been hotter — and the battle for second place among the top three truck nameplates shows no signs of ending.

Naturally, Ford’s F-Series line took the volume crown, just as it has for decades, with sales up 0.2 percent through the end of March. Ford boasts that F-Series incentive spending was the lowest in the segment.

Chevrolet claims it’s standing firm on its spending, avoiding the urge to boost sales with a hood-denting cash dump. Unfortunately for Chevy, sales of the Silverado line are down 15.7 percent, year to date, despite the automaker keeping the old Silverado 1500 (now with an “LD” suffix) on the market to bolster volume and offer buyers a lower entry price. The next-generation 1500 dropped late last year, with the controversially designed 2020 Heavy Duty launching this summer.

As for Ram, the continued production of the old 1500 (“Classic”) and new-for-2019 model worked wonders for volume, with the brand up 15 percent, year to date. March sales rose 9 percent.

Ram now has a growing lead over Chevrolet in the full-size truck race, recording 120,026 sales in the first quarter of 2019 to Chevy’s 114,313. In the last quarter of 2018, Silverado edged out Ram by just 226 units.

While a botched launch of the 2019 Ram 1500 proved beneficial to Chevy, which finished 2018 ahead of Ram, leads don’t always last. Compare Q1 2019’s results to the same quarter a year ago, when the Silverado nameplate garnered 135,545 buyers to the Ram line’s 103,964.

GM points to FCA’s generous sales incentives as the reason for its rival’s second-place position, though some question whether the General will have to follow suit. Even if it’s willing to let Ram take the silver sales medal, falling sales are cause for concern.

“Chevrolet has been disciplined. But how long can they maintain discipline as they’re losing market share? They’ll have to respond in some way,” Autoline host John McElroy told the Detroit Free Press.

For Ford, safe in its first-place perch (it sold 214,611 F-Series trucks last quarter), the battle between GM and FCA is an amusing distraction. The Q1 volume bump, small though it may be, is no doubt music to Jim Hackett’s ears.

A next-generation F-150 will make an appearance later this year before going on sale as a 2020 model.

[Image: © 2019 Chris Tonn/TTAC, Ford, General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
12 of 45 comments
  • Well once again Ford walks all over the competition, despite having the oldest offering in the group. Great job Ford!

    • See 8 previous
    • DenverMike DenverMike on Apr 05, 2019

      @DenverMike Frames don't define a "platform", same as fenders, headlights, etc. First learn what a platform consist of. Tahoe/Escalades for example share the Silverado/Sierra platform, depending on the generation changeover, and this while their frames are far from interchangeable.

  • Kushman1 Kushman1 on Apr 05, 2019

    So let's be honest all if not most full size pickups are all collectively ugly and overpriced as of late but when it comes down to it, it's: Ford's #1 vs Ram's interior vs chevy /GMC , than toyota, nissan When FCA made Ram into it's own entity with marketing etc to match it was a great idea because in both "america segments" of pickups and muscle coupes ram/dodge challenger is killing Chevy. If FCA woke up and realized now the time to build out both brands to take on chevy.ford etc now is the time built around those 2nd place successes. All FCA needs to do is keep marketing money going and they got it. It was never Chevy putting out a better product it was just an untapped Ram Brand.

    • WhatsMyNextCar WhatsMyNextCar on Apr 07, 2019

      I read through this comment 3 times, and I still don't follow. What are we all being honest about? And how is that related to the rest of your comment? What's the garbage about "america segments" [sic]? Is your point that FCA just needs to keep advertising? Is the whole comment just a rant about FCA? My goodness... This was a waste of time.

  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next