Here's Ford's Plan to Replace All the Cars It's Killing Off in North America

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Earlier this year Ford announced the impending removal of all passenger cars from its lineup, save the Mustang and — if we’re creative about what qualifies as a car — the lifted Focus Active. However, the automaker says it intends to fill the void over the next five years.

Speaking at a press event leading up to the Woodward Dream Cruise, an annual Detroit event celebrating classic automobiles, Ford product chief Hau Thai Tang said the brand plans to add nine nameplates by 2023 — effectively replacing the Fiesta, Focus, Fusion, Taurus, C-Max, and Flex, while adding in three additional models.

Before you start getting over-excited about the potential return of the Ford Fairlane or Torino, seven of these vehicles fall into the pickup or utility segment. That leaves two open spaces for prospective sedans or, more likely, quirky electrics.

“This is a profound shift in terms of how Ford is thinking about the business, and how we’re working,” Thai-Tang said Thursday, according to Automotive News.

It’s more than a little ironic to have Ford’s product chief discussing the company’s carless future as the preamble for one of North America’s biggest car-focused events. Of course, while those enthusiasts might spend this weekend tooling around in classic muscle cars and low-slung cruisers, odds are still good that their daily drivers are crossovers or pickups. Ford knows this, and it is a big reason why it’s tailoring its lineup to better suit the present-day public.

The company also knows that it needs to seduce investors, as share prices mean more than profits in 2018. Wall Street likes glitz and glamour, so Ford played into that. It has autonomous vehicles planted firmly in its crosshairs and, more importantly, a plan to build up the data side of its business. The vehicle lineup is only one piece of the overall puzzle, even though it’s not an insignificant one. But investors also like to hear about all the great things a company is working on. Promises, no matter how wild, must to be made to cater to their short attention spans and fickle wallets. As a result, Ford excels in keeping the world abridged of its plans.

“We believe,” Thai-Tang said. “I think we have to do a good job telling the story and the rationale, and giving [analysts and investors] tangible proof points. That’s the challenge for all of us.”

As this author has covered the tech angle more than enough for one week, let’s get back to sussing out those new models. We already know the Bronco is just around the corner, joined eventually by a smaller unibody “off-roader” that shares components with the Escape and Focus. The returning Ranger pickup, also rumored to get a baby brother by 2022, qualifies as one of these new models. There’s also the contentious Mustang-inspired electric crossover — a model that’s almost painfully difficult to imagine, based on its weird premise.

Ford’s planning its future models (and redesigns) around five modular architectures. Those platforms include rear or all-wheel drive body-on-frame; front or all-wheel drive unibody; commercial van unibody; rear or all-wheel drive unibody; and one intended specifically for battery-electric vehicles. However, all of the platforms will be able to accomodate hybridization to some degree.

It’s a lot to do inside of five years, but Ford seems to have the tools and drive to get it done. The company believes that keeping the lineup fresh is just as important as tailoring it to better suit consumer trends. “It’s like selling fish and vegetables,” Thai-Tang said. “The fresher it is, the better they do.”

[Image: Ford Motor Co.]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 64 comments
  • Carroll Prescott Carroll Prescott on Aug 20, 2018

    Even the Duh sisters, Hon and Toyo, saw sedan sales tank last month. How long before they start to realize that people want those putrid CUV's and SUV's?

  • Thomas Leavitt Thomas Leavitt on Aug 20, 2018

    I want a comfortable, reliable, fuel efficient vehicle to get me to and from points A and B for the 25-30,000 miles I drive every year for work and pleasure, 95% of which are solo, and 99.99% of which involve no more cargo than a briefcase and overnight bag. A crossover, SUV or full blown truck is completely inappropriate for this purpose. If I happen to need a pickup, I can rent one from U-Haul for $19.99/day. What is this obsession with spending excessive $ on utility vehicles rarely used as such?

  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Thankfully I don't have to deal with GDI issues in my Frontier. These cleaners should do well for me if I win.
  • Theflyersfan Serious answer time...Honda used to stand for excellence in auto engineering. Their first main claim to fame was the CVCC (we don't need a catalytic converter!) engine and it sent from there. Their suspensions, their VTEC engines, slick manual transmissions, even a stowing minivan seat, all theirs. But I think they've been coasting a bit lately. Yes, the Civic Type-R has a powerful small engine, but the Honda of old would have found a way to get more revs out of it and make it feel like an i-VTEC engine of old instead of any old turbo engine that can be found in a multitude of performance small cars. Their 1.5L turbo-4...well...have they ever figured out the oil dilution problems? Very un-Honda-like. Paint issues that still linger. Cheaper feeling interior trim. All things that fly in the face of what Honda once was. The only thing that they seem to have kept have been the sales staff that treat you with utter contempt for daring to walk into their inner sanctum and wanting a deal on something that isn't a bare-bones CR-V. So Honda, beat the rest of your Japanese and Korean rivals, and plug-in hybridize everything. If you want a relatively (in an engineering way) easy way to get ahead of the curve, raise the CAFE score, and have a major point to advertise, and be able to sell to those who can't plug in easily, sell them on something that will get, for example, 35% better mileage, plug in when you get a chance, and drives like a Honda. Bring back some of the engineering skills that Honda once stood for. And then start introducing a portfolio of EVs once people are more comfortable with the idea of plugging in. People seeing that they can easily use an EV for their daily errands with the gas engine never starting will eventually sell them on a future EV because that range anxiety will be lessened. The all EV leap is still a bridge too far, especially as recent sales numbers have shown. Baby steps. That's how you win people over.
  • Theflyersfan If this saves (or delays) an expensive carbon brushing off of the valves down the road, I'll take a case. I understand that can be a very expensive bit of scheduled maintenance.
  • Zipper69 A Mini should have 2 doors and 4 cylinders and tires the size of dinner plates.All else is puffery.
  • Theflyersfan Just in time for the weekend!!! Usual suspects A: All EVs are evil golf carts, spewing nothing but virtue signaling about saving the earth, all the while hacking the limbs off of small kids in Africa, money losing pits of despair that no buyer would ever need and anyone that buys one is a raging moron with no brains and the automakers who make them want to go bankrupt.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Usual suspects B: All EVs are powered by unicorns and lollypops with no pollution, drive like dreams, all drivers don't mind stopping for hours on end, eating trays of fast food at every rest stop waiting for charges, save the world by using no gas and batteries are friendly to everyone, bugs included. Everyone should torch their ICE cars now and buy a Tesla or Bolt post haste.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Or those in the middle: Maybe one of these days, when the charging infrastructure is better, or there are more options that don't cost as much, one will be considered as part of a rational decision based on driving needs, purchasing costs environmental impact, total cost of ownership, and ease of charging.(Source: many on this site who don't jump on TTAC the split second an EV article appears and lives to trash everyone who is a fan of EVs.)
Next