Rare Rides: A 1989 Acura Legend Coupe, Luxury With Five Speeds

rare rides a 1989 acura legend coupe luxury with five speeds

The Rare Rides series has touched on Acura only once before, in the only Rare Rides Review (to date) of a Honda-owned 2003 Acura CL Type-S.

Today marks the second edition of Acura Time, and we step back to the company’s first-ever midsize coupe. Let’s check out a tidy tan-over-tan Legend from 1989.

Acura had a four-year jump on the Lexus brand which would eventually bury it in sales when it entered the North American market for the 1986 model year. At introduction, there were two models of Acura on offer, which were supplemented in short order to total four body styles. The entry-level models were the coupe and sedan Integras, flanked by the upper-middle class Legend coupe and sedan. Ah, simple lineups! What a time to be alive.

In addition to a first attempt at midsize luxury, the Legend was also the first Honda in production to have a V6 engine. Previously Honda shied away from excesses like power steering, air conditioning, and engines with more than four cylinders. But that skinflint essence of car attitude would not fly in an American offering above the Accord class. Worth a mention, the Legend project was a joint development with Rover, which netted Honda a reliable luxury sedan and Rover a much less reliable luxury sedan with wood and bad electrics. But we’ve covered the 825 before.

The Legend coupe joined its sedan sibling a year after the brand’s debut, in 1987. To compensate would-be buyers for the wait, the first-year coupe featured a larger 2.7-liter V6 engine (161hp) which was exclusive to the two-door for exactly one year. In 1988, sedan Legends also received the larger 2.7. Legend entered the North American market with a 2.5-liter engine that produced 151 horsepower. Two transmissions were on offer in the first generation Legend: a four-speed automatic, and five-speed manual.

The Legend’s first update occurred for 1989, with a visual refresh for the sedan which was not carried over to the coupe. Nonvisual updates were bestowed upon both versions of the Legend and included standard ABS and a memory seat function for the driver. The LS trim in ’89 also featured a standard driver’s airbag, a trip computer, Bose audio, and vehicle monitoring in the dash. Additional visual revisions were made for the first generation Legend’s final model year in 1990, and mostly consisted of tail lamps, some new seats, and body-colored trim. Those changes made it to the sedan and coupe.

The second-generation Legend was ready for 1991, and arrived with a larger engine, more modern styling, and a higher price tag (especially for the coupe). With the second generation Legend two-door, Acura intended to go head-to-head with the Lexus SC 300.

Today’s Legend is a base L trim, with a manual transmission and cloth seats. The seller claims it has no dents but those with functioning eyes will disagree. But hey, “I know what I got,” says he. Yours for $4,000.

[Images: seller]

Join the conversation
2 of 32 comments
  • Cicero Cicero on Oct 29, 2020

    The Legend was nice but it seemed like a halfway effort if Honda's intent was to crack the premium market. With its midsize profile, front-wheel drive and nothing on offer larger than a V-6, it would never challenge the players in the ritzy end of the market. Honda needed to go all in with a full-size rear-driver with a V-8 (or more) if it was going to be taken seriously. While I was a longtime Honda fan and very open to the idea of stepping up to a premium product by Honda, I wasn't interested in buying what seemed like an Accord at a higher trim level. Today I'm not even sure what Honda considers Acura to be in relation to the market at large, and I don't give it a second thought when deciding on my next ride.

  • Saturnotaku Saturnotaku on Oct 30, 2020

    My best friend in high school had one of these. It was 1997-98 and the car had I want to say around 120,000 miles at the time but felt, looked, and according to him, drove like new.

  • Arthur Dailey For the Hornet less expensive interior materials/finishings, decontent just a little, build it in North America and sell it for less and everyone should be happy with both the Dodge and the Alfa.
  • Bunkie I so wanted to love this car back in the day. At the time I owned a GT6+ and I was looking for something more modern. But, as they say, this car had *issues*. The first of which was the very high price premium for the V8. It was a several thousand dollar premium over the TR-7. The second was the absolutely awful fuel economy. That put me off the car and I bought a new RX-7 which, despite the thirsty rotary, still got better mileage and didn’t require premium fuel. I guess I wasn’t the only one who had this reaction because, two years later, I test-drove a leftover that had a $2,000 price cut. I don’t remember being impressed, the RX-7 had spoiled me with how easy it was to own. The TR-8 didn’t feel quick to me and it felt heavy. The first-gen RX was more in line with the idea of a light car that punched above its weight. I parted ways with both the GT6+ and the RX7 and, to this day, I miss them both.
  • Fred Where you going to build it? Even in Texas near Cat Springs they wanted to put up a country club for sport cars. People complained, mostly rich people who had weekend hobby farms. They said the noise would scare their cows. So they ended up in Dickinson, where they were more eager for development of any kind.
  • MaintenanceCosts I like the styling of this car inside and out, but not any of the powertrains. Give it the 4xe powertrain - or, better yet, a version of that powertrain with the 6-cylinder Hurricane - and I'd be very interested.
  • Daniel J I believe anyone, at any level, should get paid as much as the market will bear. Why should CEOs have capped salaries or compensation but middle management shouldn't? If companies support poor CEOs and poor CEOs keep getting rewarded, it's up to the consumer and investors to force that company to either get a better CEO or to reduce the salary of that CEO. What I find hilarious is that consumers will continue to support companies where the pay for the CEOs is very high. And the same people complain. I stopped buying from Amazon during the pandemic. Everyone happily buys from them but the CEO makes bank. Same way with Walmart and many other retailers. Tim Cook got 100m in compensation last year yet people line up to buy Iphones. People who complain and still buy the products must not really care that much.