Nissan to Keep Closer Tabs on Dealerships in 2021, Retailers Annoyed


After enduring a series of rough years resulting in some unsettling financial reports, Nissan is doing its utmost to turn things around. Following its first annual loss in 11 years, the company announced a plan that would include cutting 20 percent of its global lineup to make way for newer models, eliminating unnecessary production capacity, and cutting corners (and jobs) just about everywhere in order to save $2.8 billion off of fixed costs. This is also being done to make way for a leaner, meaner Nissan, and make room for newer vehicles it believes will be essential to remain competitive.
It’s also hoping to spruce up dealerships to make them more desirable locales for customers ready to do their business. That includes an increased number of factory audits moving into 2021 — partly as a way to make up for the limited number that were conducted this year thanks to the pandemic and partly as a way to make sure nobody is doing anything financially untoward. But there are some concerns among owners that Nissan may end up bullying shops unnecessarily.
There are claims that it has been ramping up factory audits already, however. Nissan’s National Dealer Advisory Board has received complaints from members stating that they’ve been issued demands from the manufacturer to repay amounts of up to $140,000. Many have also said the audits are not triggered by suspicious sales or warranty claim activity and appear predatory in nature.
From Automotive News:
The clawback unfolds as parent company Nissan Motor Co. of Yokohama, Japan, is in financial turmoil. The company has forecast an operating loss of $4.5 billion for the fiscal year, ending March 31, 2021. Nissan executives are scrambling to find ways to tighten up company finances.
“Nissan has lost more money than they’ve ever lost in 20 years,” said one dealer who said he was recently charged back about $60,000 in warranty claims. “It’s an easy way for them to get cash.”
Some of the dealers, who spoke with Automotive News on condition that they not be identified, said the new audits are tending toward nitpicking, calling for repayment for infractions such as incomplete paperwork.
“They certainly don’t seem to be accommodating with a reasonable man’s approach to doing a warranty audit at a dealership,” said one retailer, who is facing a $40,000 chargeback. “Typically, warranty audits are looking for fraud. They’re not looking for ‘Did you time-punch everything to perfection?’?”
To its credit, Nissan has recently upgraded dealer education protocols to help employees avoid minor infractions or major safety violations that could result in a fine. But dealers continue to suggest recent audits aren’t based on concerning warranty claims, safety concerns, or evidence of fraud — with some claiming the factory is abusing the system to find excuses to fine their shop. Nissan said a lot of checks are made at random but that it will also look into any retailer with suspect paperwork or a string of customer complaints.
The truth of the matter probably lies in the automaker having a real desire to make sure dealerships are in tip-top shape, with the ability to pad its revenue via audits being an added bonus. This has not stopped shop owners from accusing Nissan of taking advantage, however, and plenty intend on using the law to combat fines. Dealer attorney Richard Sox, managing partner at Bass Sox Mercer of Tallahassee, FL, told AN such practices can become revenue centers for automakers in their times of need.
“It’s a tremendous transfer of wealth from dealers to the manufacturer,” he said. “Auditors have admitted their instructions are to make sure they pay for themselves in regards to their findings. So they have to dig things up.”
[Image: FotograFFF/Shutterstock]
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Nrd515 Usually for me it's been Arby's for pretty much forever, except when the one near my house dosed me with food poisoning twice in about a year. Both times were horrible, but the second time was just so terrible it's up near the top of my medical horror stories, and I have a few of those. Obviously, I never went to that one again. I'm still pissed at Arby's for dropping Potato Cakes, and Culver's is truly better anyway. It will be Arby's fish for my "cheat day", when I eat what I want. No tartar sauce and no lettuce on mine, please. And if I get a fish and a French Dip & Swiss? Keep the Swiss, and the dip, too salty. Just the meat and the bread for me, thanks. The odds are about 25% that they will screw one or both of them up and I will have to drive through again to get replacement sandwiches. Culver's seems to get my order right many times in a row, but if I hurry and don't check my order, that's when it's screwed up and garbage to me. My best friend lives on Starbucks coffee. I don't understand coffee's appeal at all. Both my sister and I hate anything it's in. It's like green peppers, they ruin everything they touch. About the only things I hate more than coffee are most condiments, ranked from most hated to..who cares..[list=1][*]Tartar sauce. Just thinking about it makes me smell it in my head. A nod to Ranch here too. Disgusting. [/*][*]Mayo. JEEEEZUS! WTF?[/*][*]Ketchup. Sweet puke tasting sludge. On my fries? Salt. [/*][*]Mustard. Yikes. Brown, yellow, whatever, it's just awful.[/*][*]Pickles. Just ruin it from the pickle juice. No. [/*][*]Horsey, Secret, whatever sauce. Gross. [/*][*]American Cheese. American Sleeze. Any cheese, I don't want it.[/*][*]Shredded lettuce. I don't hate it, but it's warm and what's the point?[/*][*]Raw onion. Totally OK, but not something I really want. Grilled onions is a whole nother thing, I WANT those on a burger.[/*][*]Any of that "juice" that Subway and other sandwich places want to put on. NO, HELL NO! Actually, move this up to #5. [/*][/list=1]
- SPPPP It seems like a really nice car that's just still trying to find its customer.
- MRF 95 T-Bird I owned an 87 Thunderbird aka the second generation aero bird. It was a fine driving comfortable and very reliable car. Quite underrated compared to the GM G-body mid sized coupes since unlike them they had rack and pinion steering and struts on all four wheels plus fuel injection which GM was a bit late to the game on their mid and full sized cars. When I sold it I considered a Mark VII LSC which like many had its trouble prone air suspension deleted and replaced with coils and struts. Instead I went for a MN-12 Thunderbird.
- SCE to AUX Somebody got the bill of material mixed up and never caught it.Maybe the stud was for a different version (like the 4xe) which might use a different fuel tank.
- Inside Looking Out Scandinavian design costs only $600? I mean the furniture.
Comments
Join the conversation
I never considered Nissan but assumed that dealers will honor warranty. Now I has doubts about it. Who will make repairs under warranty if dealers are disincentivized to do that?
Just another reason to not buy a Nissan besides Jatco transmissions and declining quality.