Buy/Drive/Burn: Moderately Luxurious American Coupes From 1976

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

It’s been a while since Buy/Drive/Burn covered a trio from the Seventies; December 2019, in fact. But today we return to that decade of automotive change with (almost) everybody’s favorite topic: personal luxury coupes.

Let’s sort out which of these PLCs was worth taking home in ’76.

Dodge Charger

Dodge’s Charger nameplate debuted for the 1966 model year as the company’s muscle car offering. It maintained this guise through 1974, before Chrysler realized that muscle cars were old hat and a PLC was the new hotness. In 1975, the fourth-generation Charger debuted in its new luxury form. Twinning its styling with the Chrysler Cordoba, the Charger was offered solely in SE trim for its first year. Engines on offer were all V8s, in 318 (5.9L), 360 (5.9L) and 400 (6.6L) displacements. In its second model year, trims expanded to four: base and Sport versions were a rebadge of the old Dodge Coronet, while the SE and Daytona trims continued the Charger’s 1974 styling. Transmissions on offer included a three-speed manual or automatic, as well as a four-speed manual. Today’s SE has the mid-pack 360 V8 and an automatic.

Ford Elite

The rise of the PLC market necessitated a product expansion from Ford. The company needed something nicer than the Gran Torino, but less expensive than the top-flight Thunderbird, to satisfy the middle market. Thus in 1974, the Gran Torino Elite trim was introduced. For the first year, it was advertised separately to the Gran Torino, but for all other purposes was still a trim of that model. Ford classed it up from its originally planned name: Gran Torino XL. In 1975, the Elite dropped its prefix and became an independent model. Engines ranged from a 351 (5.8L) V8 to a massive 460 (7.5L), and all cars used the same three-speed automatic. 1976 was the final year for Elite, as a product shakeup occurred in ’77. The shrunken LTD II-based mid-size Thunderbird absorbed the customer for the Elite, and it was thus dropped. Today’s Elite has the middle option 400 (6.6L) Modified V8.

Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme

The Cutlass Supreme was an early entrant into the PLC field, introduced in 1966 as the top spec of the Cutlass range. Like the Elite it was initially a trim of the Cutlass, but unlike either of the other vehicles here, the Supreme name was applied to multiple body styles. A new generation for 1973 limited offerings to a two-door coupe and four-door sedan. The new version included a unique roofline reserved for the Cutlass Supreme coupe. In 1976 the Cutlass Supreme was reworked visually, gaining the quad square headlamps which would take Oldsmobile through all of the Eighties. A pinnacle-tier Brougham trim was added to the Supreme name, creating the model’s ultimate luxury variant. Engines on offer ranged from a 231 (3.8L) Buick V6 through a 455 (7.5L) Oldsmobile V8. Transmissions were of three speeds in manual or automatic guise. A five-speed manual was eventually available, but only with the 260 (4.3L) V8. Today’s Supreme utilizes the familiar 350 (5.7L) Olds V8 and an automatic transmission.

Three luxury coupes, all of them bringing mid-Seventies driving bliss. Which goes home with a Buy?

[Images: seller, Ford, Dodge]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 84 comments
  • 71charger_fan 71charger_fan on Aug 28, 2020

    I've spent time behind the wheel of a '76 Cutlass S and a '78 Charger SE. Although I've never driven an Elite, I've driven a couple of '70s Torinos. I would definitely burn the Ford. Buy or drive between the Olds and the Dodge is a toss up. Although, given the formal grill of the Olds on offer, I guess I would buy the Dodge and drive the Olds. If it was a Cutlass S, I would buy the Olds and drive the Dodge.

  • Jeff S Jeff S on Aug 30, 2020

    On second thought I would burn both the Dodge and the Ford and buy and drive the Cutlass. Although this is the Malaise Era for cars the GM intermediates and full size were still better than Fords, Chryslers, and AMCs of this Era. I liked the looks of the Cordoba and the Charger but I knew quite a few people from this time that had both of Fords and Chryslers especially Chryslers that had major problems with them.

  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
  • TheEndlessEnigma Poor planning here, dropping a Vinfast dealer in Pensacola FL is just not going to work. I love Pensacola and that part of the Gulf Coast, but that area is by no means an EV adoption demographic.
  • Keith Most of the stanced VAGS with roof racks are nuisance drivers in my area. Very likely this one's been driven hard. And that silly roof rack is extra $'s, likely at full retail lol. Reminds me of the guys back in the late 20th century would put in their ads that the installed aftermarket stereo would be a negotiated extra. Were they going to go find and reinstall that old Delco if you didn't want the Kraco/Jenson set up they hacked in?
Next