Buy/Drive/Burn: Japanese Trucks From 1972

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

Buy/Drive/Burn doesn’t talk trucks very often, but today’s an exception. Today’s trio are from the very inception of Japanese compact truck offerings in North America. They mostly rusted away long ago, but perhaps you remember them fondly.

Right now, it’s 1972. Let’s go.

Mazda B1600

Mazda’s B-series truck (sometimes called Proceed) was in its second generation for the long span between 1965 and 1977. It greeted U.S. customers for the first time in 1972, when the B1600 joined a handful of small passenger cars at Mazda dealers. Equipped for its first year with a 1.6-liter inline-four, the B1600 made 95 horsepower. In 1974 Mazda confused Americans by adding the Rotary Pickup to its range, a move which made no sense then or today. The B1600 was succeeded by the larger engine of the B1800 for 1975 in the United States. Mazda offered Canadians the B1800 starting in 1970.

Toyota Hilux

In 1972, Toyota was still selling the first-generation Hilux in North America. Those first Hiluxes were developed and manufactured by Hino. Entering production in spring of 1968, the model was introduced to America for 1969. Bed sizes were limited to the short-wheelbase version for the first few years, with the long-wheelbase added for ’72. Engines gradually increased in power as Toyota realized what American consumers wanted. The initial 1.9-liter four was replaced in 1970 by a 1.9L with overhead cams. For 1972 this engine was swapped for the 2.0-liter 18R, which made 109 horsepower. 1973 brought the second generation Hilux, which was immediately redesigned in 1975 to be larger and more like what Americans desired. Then it changed its name to Truck.

Datsun 521

Datsun beat Toyota and Mazda to market with a compact truck, marketing its 520 in America in 1968. The original 520 entered production in 1965 for the ’66 model year before being upgraded to the 521 in 1969. The revised version had a flattened hood, fenders, and a new grille. Fender emblems indicated the engine size, ultimately resulting in the Datsun 1600 for 1971 and 1972. It carried a 1.6-liter inline-four of 96 horsepower. 521 was replaced for the 1973 model year by the 620.

Three pickups with little power and little rust resistance. Which one was worth a Buy in 1972?

[Images: Toyota, Nissan Heritage Collection, Mazda]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 78 comments
  • Art Vandelay Art Vandelay on Dec 17, 2019

    miserable little S#!+boxes...all of em'

  • Tbone33 Tbone33 on Dec 17, 2019

    Buy! I bought a 16 year old Nissan 720 for $400 out of college in 2000, when I had about $600 to my name. The truck had 185k miles on it when I purchased it, and the lady I bought it from said she wouldn't drive it outside of town due to the high mileage. The thing leaked oil, but I sold it to a gardener 3 years later with 30k more miles on the odometer for $400. It was a perfect flat broke and fresh out of college car, even if it did need a new alternator a year before I sold it. I've long wished we still had a few compact pickups on the market that drive like shit, accelerate like a sloth, cost little, and run forever. Selfishly, it would be great to have a cheap motorcycle mover. Selflessly, it would be nice to have cheap transportation for the many that need it.

  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
  • SPPPP I am actually a pretty big Alfa fan ... and that is why I hate this car.
  • SCE to AUX They're spending billions on this venture, so I hope so.Investing during a lull in the EV market seems like a smart move - "buy low, sell high" and all that.Key for Honda will be achieving high efficiency in its EVs, something not everybody can do.
  • ChristianWimmer It might be overpriced for most, but probably not for the affluent city-dwellers who these are targeted at - we have tons of them in Munich where I live so I “get it”. I just think these look so terribly cheap and weird from a design POV.
Next