Electric Utility: Volkswagen Previews the I.D. Buzz Cargo

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

As the Microbus-inspired I.D. Buzz approaches production, Volkswagen has been careful to not stray too far from its roots. The original idea behind the 1950 Type 2 was the development of an economical vehicle that would be ideal for transporting cargo in an urban environment, but could also double as a people mover. While the Buzz places an emphasis on family togetherness and weekend adventures, VW claims there will also be a cargo variant focused on taking care of business.

Presented at the IAA Commercial Vehicles event in Hannover last week, the I.D. Buzz Cargo is that vehicle. Unfortunately, it’s not the final product. Its strong resemblance to the Buzz concept vehicle will probably carry over into production, but neither model will use a dot matrix of LEDs for forward illumination or do away with side mirrors. However, Volkswagen did more than just show off another concept. It included some meaningful specifications and a target launch date of 2021 for the electric transporter.

Unlike the passenger version, the Buzz Cargo utilizes a single sliding door at the rear to free up the other side for storage. The tailgate will also be modified to better accommodate oversized objects, meaning split doors should be available as an option if they aren’t the standard. It also replaces the family model’s panoramic glass roof with a solid sheet of metal that VW claims can be used as a platform for affixing solar panels, thus extending the van’s daily range by roughly 9 miles.

Since Volkswagen intends to use scalable battery sizes on all of its Modular Electric Drive Kit vehicles, it claims the maximum range of the model should sit somewhere between about 200 and 340 miles, using the newer WLTP cycle. However, VW did say that the Buzz could be capable of more when equipped with the biggest power core option. The automaker previewed the concept with a relatively small 48 kWh unit, but VW said a 111 kWh battery should be available.

With a 150-kW (201-horsepower) electric motor providing motivation, the Buzz Cargo probably won’t be soul-crushingly slow around town. But you might find it a drag on the Autobahn, as its top speed is electronically limited at 99 mph.

Additional features include a 230V outlet to power workers’ tools without the need of an additional generator, plus a digital cargo system that allows drivers and business owners to keep tabs on their route, load, and vehicle condition.

Similar in concept to VW’s e-Crafter, the I.D. Buzz Cargo is quite a bit smaller. The e-Crafter panel van launched with an overall length of 235.7 inches and a maximum payload of anywhere between 2,000 and 3,500 pounds, depending on how it’s outfitted. Meanwhile, this concept version of the Buzz is said to be 198.7 inches long, 77.8 inches wide, and 77.3 inches tall, with a maximum payload of just 1,760 pounds. Wheels are said to measure 20 inches with 235/55 tires — downsized slightly from the passenger variant, and boasting more rubber.

VW offered up plenty of tech talk, but we’re willing to wait on most of it. There’s no reason to assume VW’s promise of Level 4 autonomous driving will be ready to tackle urban environments by launch. However, Volkswagen might incorporate the concept’s keyless entry setup, which integrates a digital key into the operator’s smartphone. All we really care about is whether or not VW decides to keep the concept’s front bench.

Volkswagen says production could begin on the Buzz Cargo as early as 2021. Expect it to undergo some moderate changes before then. The automaker intends to grow EV sales as quickly as possible over the coming years, aiming to sell 150,000 electric cars globally in 2020 and a million of them annually by 2025. Both versions of the Buzz are expected to contribute heavily toward that extremely ambitious goal.

[Images: Volkswagen Group]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 7 comments
  • NeilM NeilM on Sep 25, 2018

    So how does frontal crash protection work with this thing? Nobody cared back in the old Microbus days, but that was then.

    • Garak Garak on Sep 26, 2018

      The seats are quite far back compared to the original hippie vans, so the production version probably has pretty regular crash performance.

  • TDIandThen.... TDIandThen.... on Sep 26, 2018

    Rough price range? Is this a lease mobile targeted at cute local businesses? I assume contractors will stick to minivans, or Sprinters for the fancy contractors.

  • TCowner Need to have 77-79 Lincoln Town Car sideways thermometer speedo!
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I'd rather they have the old sweep gauges, the hhuuggee left to right speedometer from the 40's and 50's where the needle went from lefty to right like in my 1969 Nova
  • Buickman I like it!
  • JMII Hyundai Santa Cruz, which doesn't do "truck" things as well as the Maverick does.How so? I see this repeated often with no reference to exactly what it does better.As a Santa Cruz owner the only things the Mav does better is price on lower trims and fuel economy with the hybrid. The Mav's bed is a bit bigger but only when the SC has the roll-top bed cover, without this they are the same size. The Mav has an off road package and a towing package the SC lacks but these are just some parts differences. And even with the tow package the Hyundai is rated to tow 1,000lbs more then the Ford. The SC now has XRT trim that beefs up the looks if your into the off-roader vibe. As both vehicles are soft-roaders neither are rock crawling just because of some extra bits Ford tacked on.I'm still loving my SC (at 9k in mileage). I don't see any advantages to the Ford when you are looking at the medium to top end trims of both vehicles. If you want to save money and gas then the Ford becomes the right choice. You will get a cheaper interior but many are fine with this, especially if don't like the all touch controls on the SC. However this has been changed in the '25 models in which buttons and knobs have returned.
  • Analoggrotto I'd feel proper silly staring at an LCD pretending to be real gauges.
Next