2019 Genesis G70: Korea's Answer to Germany Comes to America With Available LSD and Sport Package

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Considering how the popularity of crossover vehicles resulted in the industry-wide genocide of passenger cars, it is both strange and exciting to discuss a new sedan. While we haven’t reached the point where one could describe the situation as a blending of Children of Men and Disney’s Cars franchise, new models with a low center of gravity are becoming increasingly difficult to come by.

That’s why we’re glad Hyundai’s luxury Genesis division built the G70 and saw fit to allow the ability to option it with a manual transmission. You read that correctly; there is an automaker that builds a competitively priced luxury sedan that can be had with a manual transmission. However, buyers need to actually purchase these vehicles for the brand to rationalize that decision in the years to come.

The idea already looks to be on rather thin ice. Despite sharing a platform with the G70, Kia’s Stinger lacks the manual option for reasons unknown to us. But we can guess it has something to with the company lacking faith that they’ll move many models in a manual configuration.

There’s a little of that going on over at Genesis, too. While the company is happy to offer the sticked version with the base engine, the brawnier twin-turbo V6 is a different story. Fortunately, mating the six-speed manual to the smaller 2.0-liter turbo results in a fewer ponies getting lost along the way. Unlike the base car (equipped with an eight-speed automatic), the manual variant boasts 255 hp and 260 lb-ft of torque.

It’s not exactly an engineering miracle, but selecting your own gears also nets you rear-wheel drive, unique sport exhaust, Brembo brakes with enhanced performance pads, and “additional weight reduction measures.” You can also option a limited-slip differential.

That LSD lands in the AWD-equipped cars as well and, if all you care about is performance specs, you’ll probably want to get one of those with torque vectoring. The 3.3-liter V6 may not come with a manual but it does boast a 0-to-60 mph time of 4.5 seconds, thanks to its 365 horsepower and 376 foot-pounds of torque.

Additional options include adaptive sport suspension, 19-inch wheels with Michelin Pilot Sport 4 summer tires, and Active Sound Design — which pumps in faux exhaust noises paired to the car’s five available drive modes (Sport, Comfort, Smart, Eco and Custom).

The G70 was officially unveiled in September and had its U.S. debut at the 2018 New York International Auto Show. Meanwhile, Hyundai has been trying to figure out a way to get the Genesis brand its own dealer network, or at least ensure existing Hyundai/Kia shops give the luxury models their own area.

You might think separating the G70 and the Kia Stinger would be essential, as they’re basically the same car and eagle-eyed shopper could see through the luxury veneer. But they aren’t the same. While they share a common architecture, the Genesis is noticeably smaller, isn’t a hatchback, and weighs about 100 pounds less in every configuration.

It’s also a more dialed-in package than the Stinger, which wears its development as a grand tourer on its sleeve. That’s not a dig against the Kia, it’s simply a reminder that these two cars are less similar than you might assume. The G70 launches in the United States this summer. While pricing has yet to be announced, we suggest taking a look at similarly quipped Stingers and tacking on a couple grand.

[Images: Genesis Motors]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 51 comments
  • Hummer Hummer on Jun 13, 2018

    As high as a take rate the manual SS had I'm surprised they didn't see fit to make higher trims available with the manual. Not that I would ever buy one, leave the 4s and 6s for the economy duds, put that manual transmission behind a real V8 as God intended.

  • Cimarron typeR Cimarron typeR on Jun 13, 2018

    Currently if I were interested in a sports sedan again , this would be at the top of my list. Not that I'd be interested in voiding a great powertrain warranty but there is a solid 2.0T aftermarket left over from Gen Coupe that I'm sure will be offering tuning support.I just need to get over my 996.2,997.1 infatuation first.

  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next