Bulky A-pillars Getting in the Way? Toyota Has a Clear Solution

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Back in the days of sky-high tailfins and wraparound windshields, A-pillars weren’t of sufficient thickness to hide little Timmy riding his bike, or maybe that Ford Fairlane approaching from behind that shrub to your left. No, front seat vision was grand — trying to stop your Detroit barge with unassisted drums brakes was the real challenge.

These days, the high-strength steel and airbags needed for rollover and side-impact protection have turned those slim pillars into Corinthian columns capable of hiding a small crowd. A-Pillars are bulky, and that’s a safety problem in itself.

What to do? In Toyota’s case, simply develop a way of seeing through them.

According to a patent application filed to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office by Toyota’s American engineering arm, the automaker hopes to give drivers a way of seeing past those intrusive beams. No, Toyota isn’t patenting honeycomb pillars. (That apparently Genesis’ job.)

Toyota’s plan is to have light bend around the pillar, thus making it disappear from view. Freaky stuff, but not the time-bending pseudo-science of Philadelphia Experiment folklore. The “cloaking device” in the company’s patent uses a far simpler and cheaper solution: carefully arranged mirrors.

By reflecting what’s behind the A-pillar onto the interior surface of the pillar, the obstruction all but vanishes, leaving the driver looking at little Timmy or that errant Fairlane instead. Toyota explains it a far more technical, albeit confusing way:

A cloaking device includes cloaking region boundary planes oriented non-planar to each other, each of the cloaking region boundary plans having an outward facing mirror surface and an outward facing opaque surface. The cloaking device includes a cloaking region bounded at least partially by the inward facing opaque surfaces of the cloaking region boundary planes. Half mirrors are spaced apart and generally parallel to the outward facing mirror surfaces such that a half mirror is spaced apart and generally parallel to each outward facing mirror surface. Light from an object on an object-side of the cloaking device is directed around an article within the cloaking region and forms an image on an image-side of the cloaking device such the article appears transparent to an observer looking towards the object.

Got it?

The patent application describes the cloaking device as a cost-conscious alternative to pricey video display technology under development by other automakers. Presumably, the mirrored surfaces wouldn’t interfere with the pillar-mounted airbag.

Whether or not we’ll see these see-through pillars in a future Toyota or Lexus vehicle remains to be seen (or not, ha ha), so for now we’ll have to be content with the above drawing.

[Images: Toyota]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 19 comments
  • BunkerMan BunkerMan on Aug 24, 2017

    Jaguar/Land Rover had one of these as a concept back in 2014 called "360 Virtual Urban Windscreen system". It used screens instead of mirrors, but it had the same result. I wonder if they patented it?

  • Ban-One Ban-One on Aug 25, 2017

    people still look out the windshield? every driver i see these days is staring at their phone

  • SCE to AUX With these items under the pros:[list][*]It's quick, though it seems to take the powertrain a second to get sorted when you go from cruising to tromping on it.[/*][*]The powertrain transitions are mostly smooth, though occasionally harsh.[/*][/list]I'd much rather go electric or pure ICE I hate herky-jerky hybrid drivetrains.The list of cons is pretty damning for a new vehicle. Who is buying these things?
  • Jrhurren Nissan is in a sad state of affairs. Even the Z mentioned, nice though it is, will get passed over 3 times by better vehicles in the category. And that’s pretty much the story of Nissan right now. Zero of their vehicles are competitive in the segment. The only people I know who drive them are company cars that were “take it or leave it”.
  • Jrhurren I rented a RAV for a 12 day vacation with lots of driving. I walked away from the experience pretty unimpressed. Count me in with Team Honda. Never had a bad one yet
  • ToolGuy I don't deserve a vehicle like this.
  • SCE to AUX I see a new Murano to replace the low-volume Murano, and a new trim level for the Rogue. Yawn.
Next