First 2018 Chevrolet Equinox Design Sucked So Bad That Mark Reuss Has Vowed You'll Never See It
After a long eight-year run for the second-generation Chevrolet Equinox, General Motors finally dropped the third-generation 2018 Chevrolet Equinox in September 2016. The 2018 Chevrolet Equinox might not be your cup of tea — I like the look, and the diesel option — but we learned late last month that it could have been downright awful.
How bad was it? It looked too bulky, too odd, too underwhelming, according to focus groups. The Equinox’s chief engineer, Mark Cieslak, said, “What we have on paper we felt was not going to win.”
So GM went back to the drawing board.
But seriously, how bad was it? We want to know, as does Autoweek, which tweeted last Saturday, “We really want to see what the abandoned version looked like.”
GM’s executive vice president for global product development, the Twitter-affable Mark Reuss, responded just 10 minutes later. And, uh, my guess is they really don’t want us to see the first third-gen Equinox.
“Too bad. Ain’t gonna happen,” Mark Reuss replied to the Autoweek tweet.
Of course that’s what he’s going to say. If GM relented and showed us pictures and specs of a small crossover that wasn’t good enough to bring to an auto show, let alone bring to market, the automaker would have to suffer the consequences. Images of a failed GM design would be passed around the internet for the rest of time.
And yet, Mark Reuss didn’t really have to say anything. He wasn’t forced to comment on a tweet by a single publication on a Saturday afternoon.
Mark Reuss went out of his way to tell Autoweek’s editors and readers that they can’t, they shall not, they will never feast their eyes upon the failure that was the early Equinox draft.
Was it really that bad?
Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures. Follow on Twitter @goodcarbadcar and on Facebook.
More by Timothy Cain
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- CanadaCraig You can just imagine how quickly the tires are going to wear out on a 5,800 lbs AWD 2024 Dodge Charger.
- Luke42 I tried FSD for a month in December 2022 on my Model Y and wasn’t impressed.The building-blocks were amazing but sum of the all of those amazing parts was about as useful as Honda Sensing in terms of reducing the driver’s workload.I have a list of fixes I need to see in Autopilot before I blow another $200 renting FSD. But I will try it for free for a month.I would love it if FSD v12 lived up to the hype and my mind were changed. But I have no reason to believe I might be wrong at this point, based on the reviews I’ve read so far. [shrug]. I’m sure I’ll have more to say about it once I get to test it.
- FormerFF We bought three new and one used car last year, so we won't be visiting any showrooms this year unless a meteor hits one of them. Sorry to hear that Mini has terminated the manual transmission, a Mini could be a fun car to drive with a stick.It appears that 2025 is going to see a significant decrease in the number of models that can be had with a stick. The used car we bought is a Mk 7 GTI with a six speed manual, and my younger daughter and I are enjoying it quite a lot. We'll be hanging on to it for many years.
- Oberkanone Where is the value here? Magna is assembling the vehicles. The IP is not novel. Just buy the IP at bankruptcy stage for next to nothing.
- Jalop1991 what, no Turbo trim?
Comments
Join the conversation
I personally think this one looks terrible. It's like someone left the current-gen outside too long and it melted in the sun.
Style-wise there is only so much you can do with a CUV. The CUV has become the most bland, generic body style. I can't tell one model from another without looking at the grill.