Chevrolet's Early Choice for an Equinox Redesign Was a Real Dog: Report

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

To say the 2018 Chevrolet Equinox is an important model for General Motors is to downplay the importance of the crucial compact crossover segment. Lighter, trimmer and more fuel efficient than before, the new right-sized Equinox erases many of the drawbacks of its long-in-the-tooth predecessor.

However, if “Old GM” was still in existence (and some would argue it still is), the 2018 model would have arrived on dealer lots with a built-in drawback approved by Detroit bigwigs. By that, we mean design. According to the vehicle’s chief engineer, the third-generation model’s initial design sent focus groups scurrying up a tree.

Speaking to Automotive News, GM’s Mark Cieslak said the first design presented to focus groups met with all the acclaim of the Ghostbusters remake (or Malibu Maxx). And, had this been the pre-bankruptcy era, the automaker would likely have said, “Okay, screw it. You’re getting this. Capisce?

“Back in the day, we would have probably just kept going,” said Cieslak. That’s quite an admission, coming from a company that tries to avoid mentioning its pre-bankruptcy products in a bad light.

Those early test consumers essentially said the new model looked too bulky, too odd, and just generally underwhelmed the senses. Basically, all of the criticism leveled at the widely panned eighth-generation Malibu — a model that factored into what came next. Rather than green-light the phoned-in body and take what sales it could find, Chevy — already dealing with the Malibu’s lackluster reception — headed back to the drawing board in an effort to not be Old GM.

With the model’s existing generation poised to last eight model years, its replacement needed to wow. Or at least not repel.

Ultimately, the automaker scrapped the designed-by-committee styling, shaved 400-plus pounds from the curb weight, and shoehorned the downsized model into the heart of the compact segment. The Equinox has always represented something of a value buy, so it will be interesting to see if the tech-laden, fuel-sipping 2018 model surpasses its popular predecessor in sales.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 70 comments
  • Oldowl Oldowl on Mar 28, 2017

    The slanted C pillar makes it look as if the rear end was grafted on a sedan. A lot of venom in that vellum.

  • Bd2 Bd2 on Mar 29, 2017

    Wonder how ugly the original design was as this isn't exactly a "looker."

  • W Conrad I'd gladly get an EV, but I can't even afford anything close to a new car right now. No doubt if EV's get more affordable more people will be buying them. It is a shame so many are stuck in their old ways with ICE vehicles. I realize EV's still have some use cases that don't work, but for many people they would work just fine with a slightly altered mindset.
  • Master Baiter There are plenty of affordable EVs--in China where they make all the batteries. Tesla is the only auto maker with a reasonably coherent strategy involving manufacturing their own cells in the United States. Tesla's problem now is I think they've run out of customers willing to put up with their goofy ergonomics to have a nice drive train.
  • Cprescott Doesn't any better in red than it did in white. Looks like an even uglier Honduh Civic 2 door with a hideous front end (and that is saying something about a Honduh).
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Nice look, but too short.
  • EBFlex Considering Ford assured us the fake lightning was profitable at under $40k, I’d imagine these new EVs will start at $20k.
Next