Mitsubishi Might Share Future Pickup Platforms With Nissan

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky
mitsubishi might share future pickup platforms with nissan

Mitsubishi Motors needs a pickup truck for the U.S. and Nissan wants a cheaper one for the global market. While the Red Diamonds’ Raider filled a ten year gap in the company’s lineup after the American discontinuation of the Mighty Max in 1996, sales were disappointing and production ended back in 2009. Now Mitsubishi and its new parent Nissan are investigating joint production of pickup trucks in Southeast Asia as they hunt for savings within the Renault-Nissan partnership.

The two Japanese automakers may combine the technical basis and eventual production of the future replacements for the South Asian-built Nissan Navara and Mitsubishi Triton, Mitsubishi chief operating officer Trevor Mann said in an interview at the Geneva car show.

“If you look at our cost performance in that region, we are the benchmark within the alliance,” Mann told Reuters. “Our four-by-four technology, our cost base on pickups is better than Nissan’s.”

That means Mitsubishi’s pickup architectures are likely to underpin subsequent Nissan models, said Mann, who was assigned by alliance head Carlos Ghosn to turn the failing Mitsubishi around after Nissan dropped $2.3 billion for a 34 percent controlling stake last October.

While Nissan and Mitsubishi both produce frame-based pickups and cars, the vehicles have elemental manufacturing and design differences. Moving to shared architectures would allow the Mitsubishi factory to focus on pickups while the Nissan plant continues to produce cars and SUVs, increasing productivity and lowering costs for both brands, Mann said.

Although, he was also careful to say that nothing had been set in stone. The current Navara and Triton models were launched in 2014 and neither are due for replacement until 2022, meaning development decisions should still be a couple years away. However, under a common platform it might be easier to get Mitsubishi trucks back into other markets — maybe even the United States and Canada if the cooperative truck platform extends beyond Asian assembly.

[Image: Mitsubishi Motors]

Join the conversation
4 of 60 comments
  • Sirwired Sirwired on Mar 13, 2017

    I think this is more about the world market than the US. I don't understand why Nissan doesn't just pull the plug on Mitsubishi here; unless there is some real financial wizardry going on in Mitsu's production lines that make those products profitable, there's just no point in continuing to sell them in the US.

    • See 1 previous
    • Sirwired Sirwired on Mar 14, 2017

      @Big Al from Oz And that's great, and makes sense. What doesn't make sense is selling it as a Mitsubishi in the US, with the attendant pathetic dealer network, poor reputation as Subprime-Mart and BHPH-fodder.

  • Corey Lewis Corey Lewis on Mar 13, 2017

    "While the Red Diamonds' Raider filled a ten year gap..." Even then, it was just a workup of a Dakota, built right in Michigan. Not much Mitsubishi about it.

  • Wjtinfwb How does the ICE mid-engine C8 platform work for... anything else? A sedan? SUV? With a mid engine configuration? A mid-engine SUV will have to be Suburban sized to offer the utility of a CRV. GM should dust off the Omega platform designed for the Cadillac CT6 for an SUV/Sedan offering with exceptional handling, Rear or AWD capability and acceptable space utilization. They also need to focus on interior fit & finish, trim choices and high quality final engineering and assembly. What GM doesn't need is another half-baked product with a storied and prestigious badge on the decklid and a premium price on the Monroney. No more Cimarron's, Allante's or X-cars needed to tarnish the reputation of Corvette.
  • InCogKneeToe BUILD It and they will come.By Build It, I mean a Vehicle that the Customer Wants and it works for them. It could be called Chevette for all that that matters. The Mach E's success isn't because it totes the Mustang on it.Just build what people want, the next Caravan/Taurus/Beetle/Maverick (truck).
  • YellowDuck do you make a mid-engine crossover? Or even a 4-door coupe? Me not get.
  • 28-Cars-Later Thanks Corey. The head stud job on NOrthSTAR-T was $3K *years ago* as it involves an engine pull so rear wheel arch rust in and of itself isn't a show stopper. I'll be sure to check out the trunk as it may start to add up on deferred maintenance. Supposedly this was garaged so the underneath the rockers etc. should be decent but if those are shot its not gonna work.
  • Mark 2016 Hyundai Sonata Hybrid, G4NG engine with connecting rod bearing issues. Engine needs to be replaced, but Hyundai is denying warranty claim. I have all maintenance records from mile zero. It has been in Hyundai Service department 5 time in 4 months. They added the knock sensor and software update to let you know the engine is about to blow up. They kicked the can down the road doing patch work until the car was past the 120k extended extended warranty. I have that documentation too. So how can I join the class action law suit or find a Lawyer that handles these types of issues?