Henrik Fisker Returns, Claims His New Electric Vehicle Will Blow Your Mind

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Guess who’s back?

Henrik Fisker, the designer-turned-entrepreneur behind the ill-fated Fisker Karma, wants to try his hand at building a green luxury vehicle again.

The Dane wants to erase the cloud of failure that hangs over his name by building a new electric car with a Tesla-beating range, Bloomberg reports. Naturally, his name is all over the new company. In fact, it is the company.

Fisker, Inc. plans to unveil a vehicle in the second half of 2017 that draws impressive range from its shadowy battery technology, Fisker claims. The batteries will reportedly come from Fisker Nanotek, a private corporation based in northern California.

The fledgling automaker’s chairman and CEO told Bloomberg:

“We have really been working in stealth mode. For the last two years I have been looking at battery technologies and wanted to see if there was something that could really give us a new paradigm. We had the strategy of developing the technology as fast as possible without getting tied down to a large organization, which would hold us back. Now we have the technology that nobody else has. And there is nobody even close to what we are doing out there.”

Quite bragadocious, as a certain presidential candidate would say. Fisker calls the unnamed vehicle the “spiritual successor” to the Karma, which landed with a glitzy splash in 2012 before quickly sinking to the bottom of the pool. The company’s assets were sold off to a Chinese firm in 2014, with the current (unaffiliated) Karma Automotive LLC rising from those ashes.

The company isn’t dishing all the details on its ace-in-the-hole technology just yet. Fisker Nanotek CEO Jack Kavanaugh claims the technology draws from the work of a group of UCLA professors. The batteries aren’t conventional lithium-ion units, Kavanaugh says, though they do contain some lithium.

“We have already developed prototypes that you won’t see anywhere else,” he told Bloomberg.

The new technology reportedly gives the new vehicle a range of 400 miles. Production will take place at Fisker Nanotek’s manufacturing facility, with photos expected to be released closer to the middle of next year.

Fisker wouldn’t say if any remnants of the former Karma would find its way into the new vehicle, nor what the car will look like. The executive only claims that the vehicle will be attractive and very spacious, and will contain some of his signature design elements.

[Image: TEDxChapmanU/ Flickr ( CC BY-ND-NC 2.0)]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 22 comments
  • Voyager Voyager on Oct 05, 2016

    There are a number of people who claim they reinvented the battery. If it's batteries that you are pushing, why not go straight away to the guy who already owns an EV factory, Elon Musk? Fisker reminds me of Victor Muller (remember Spyker). Perhaps the two can set up the comeback kid company. Btw, I don't see why the new Karma (basically an old Karma) would succeed this time...

  • 415s30 415s30 on Oct 13, 2016

    Try getting Aptera back!!!

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Next