Even Mazda Is Now Selling More Crossovers Than Cars, But Overall Mazda Sales Are Still Down
Over the last two months, Mazda, that great tiny bastion of four-cylinder engines and SkyActiv and adding lightness, has sold more crossovers than cars in the United States.
Yes, that Mazda. The Mazda that had to rebadge Fords to bring its first two SUVs to market. The Mazda that, only four years ago, produced two-thirds of its U.S. sales with passenger cars.
Unfortunately, the gains now produced by Mazda’s CX crossover division aren’t enough to counteract the plunging sales of Mazda’s three remaining cars. As a result, Mazda’s U.S. market share is down to just 1.7 percent through 2016’s first eight months.
The good news for Mazda? Company bosses saw this coming. As part of a long-term strategy, Mazda is sticking to its guns, unwilling to overreact to disappointing short-term results with short-term fixes.
Mazda customer loyalty is poor. The company’s renewed focus on customer satisfaction does not result in overnight change.
For example, improving customer satisfaction requires improved resale values, which necessitates a cutback in sales to daily rental fleets, which decreases the brand’s total U.S. sales volume, giving the impression of sliding demand.
Meanwhile, alliances with larger rivals are necessary for Mazda to move forward on the technical front. But such partnerships take time to breed results before they’re obvious to the outside world.
As a result, wrote Paul Eisenstein after a discussion with Mazda’s North American CEO Masahiro Moro, “it will take Mazda two complete generations of new vehicles to fully transform itself.”
Some transitions take place quicker than expected, however. It was only one year ago that Mazda’s Moro told Automotive News, “I wish that more than 50 percent of our total [U.S.] sales in two or three years be crossovers.”
12 months after that interview with Automotive News, Moro’s U.S. Mazda operations gleaned 53 percent of the brand’s sales from the CX-3, CX-5, and CX-9, the brand’s trio of crossovers.MazdaAugust2016August2015%Change8 mos.20168 mos.2015%ChangeMazda 37,29710,161-28.2%66,78174,542-10.4%Mazda 64,0065,402-25.8%31,81042,550-25.2%Mazda MX-5 Miata8231,344-38.8%7,0885,12838.2%Mazda 2—5-100%3288-99.0%Mazda Passenger Cars12,126 16,912 -28.3%105,682 122,508 -13.7%Mazda CX-510,61210,0335.8%73,05472,9060.2%Mazda CX-91,8631,7536.3%7,78712,601-38.2%Mazda CX-31,492698114%12,4936981,690%Mazda Crossovers13,967 12,484 11.9%93,334 86,205 8.3%Mazda 516542-97.0%3627,377-95.1%—— —————Total26,10929,938-12.8%199,378216,090-7.7%
The relatively sudden reliance upon crossovers at Mazda USA isn’t all down to the CX sub-brand’s surge. In August, for example, Mazda sold 13,983 CX-3s, CX-5s, and CX-9s, a 1,483 year-over-year improvement. But during the same year-over-year period, Mazda lost nearly 4,800 sales from the Mazda 3, Mazda 6, and the MX-5 Miata, all of which recorded sharp U.S. sales declines.
After the 3, 6, and MX-5 combined for a 7-percent sales increase in calendar year 2015 — the car division’s total volume fell 1 percent because of the Mazda 2’s disappearance — plunging car sales have become the norm at Mazda this year.
The midsize Mazda 6 is struggling as a low-tier player in a struggling segment, and lower-tier players inevitably suffer first and worst. Mazda 6 sales are down 25 percent this year.
Despite a refresh and some added tech for model year 2017, it’s unlikely that the oft-rejected Mazda 3, no matter how spectacularly it drives, can quickly rebound from 2016’s discouraging results. Mazda 3 sales are down 10 percent this year.
“We’re hoping it will rebound with a revised pricing structure, more features and some cool, new technology like G-Vectoring Control,” Mazda spokesperson Jacob Brown says of the 3. “But, trends being what they are, customers seem to prefer CUVs at the moment, so we’re building some really great vehicles that cater to those needs and wants.”
Sales of the Mazda MX-5 Miata were on the upswing through the first-half of 2016, doubling through June. But in the two-seat roadster world, with time comes decreased demand. The MX-5 is no longer enjoying pent-up demand, and July/August volume tumbled 31 percent, a 770-unit loss in concert with 940 additional sales of its Italian platform partner, the Fiat 124 Spider. Four percent of Mazda USA volume is Miata-generated.
On the crossover side of the ledger, consistently improving sales of the Mazda CX-5, the brand’s best seller in the United States in 35 of the last 43 months, make it America’s 20th-best-selling SUV/crossover.
Yet the CX-5 is the sole source of real strength in Mazda’s crossover lineup. Sales of the hugely attractive Mazda CX-9 are beginning to increase as the second-generation CX-9 comes on stream, but Mazda has limited capacity for the CX-9. Globally, Mazda expects to sell 50,000 units per year, 80 percent of which will find homes in North America. These production levels automatically make the CX-9 a small player in a segment where the Toyota Highlander, Honda Pilot, and Nissan Pathfinder will combine for more than 350,000 sales this year. Mazda is nevertheless pleased with the new CX-9’s start.
“We’re starting to see people coming in both from mainstream automakers as well as luxury automakers,” Mazda spokesperson Jacob Brown told TTAC yesterday. “It’s doing exactly what it needed to do, and it’s doing it at a price point where few offer the craftsmanship and design that CX-9 offers.”
More bewildering are oddly poor results from the Mazda CX-3. Seven subcompact crossovers outsell the CX-3, five sell more than three times as often, three sell more than four times as often. Year-to-date, the CX-3 is outselling the Mini Countryman and Fiat 500X, but it earns just 4 percent market share in a 10-vehicle category. With nearly 4,800 CX-3s in stock, according to Cars.com, Mazda has roughly three months of supply. But all of the CX-3’s driver’s appeal seems lost on U.S. consumers. CX-3 sales are almost as numerous in Canada, a much smaller market in which Mazda’s market share is twice as strong.
Helped along by an unfortunate decrease in car volume, Mazda hit Masahiro Moro’s 50-percent crossover target much sooner than expected. But there’s room for that figure to climb higher — much higher — in relatively short order.
With no immediate plans to bring the CX-4 to North America, the CX-3 could become the central figure in any plan to push the CX division forward. For now, both in the U.S. and globally, the CX-3 is not considered by Mazda to be among its key vehicles. “However, it is anticipated that CX-3 will become a core model soon, as it is selling exceptionally well in Europe and the ASEAN markets, and trends appear to continue that momentum,” Brown says. “We are priced alongside competitors, and our product is more than competitive.”
More than competitive, indeed. But at the moment, American consumers either disagree or have failed to notice.
Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures. Follow on Twitter @goodcarbadcar and on Facebook.
Join the conversation
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Tassos There is nothing 'weird' about Finland's fine system. A few other nations have it too. Switzerland maybe, I am not sure.But you do not specify WHAT was that clown's income that required him to pay $120k for a speeding ticket?I am sure that for somebody like ELon Musk, $100k will barely operate his megayacht ONE LOUSY Day.
- Bkojote On paper, GMC is supposed to be the understated, more sophisticated member of the GM truck family.In actuality, GMC is total garbage in the truck world - by the time they're on their second owner they're decked out with amazon wheel spacers, pizza dish wheels, punisher stickers, and really angry opinions about any president who's won the popular vote in the past two decades. And man, these things are ugly as sin too.That's because GM trucks as a whole are kinda the also-rans in the truck category. Yeah, they do sales, but they aren't anyone's first choice. Not as extreme as the Ram, not as category defining as the Raptor, not as well engineered as a Toyota, so you end up with owners who compensate big time to distract others from the endless repair bills. The only owners I know who are worse are the rollin' coal lifted Super Duty drivers. Like you bought a GMC because the guy who sold you your wife's acadia is less scary than having to grovel for a Raptor and you take the Ford guys making fun of you personally.
- Tassos The rich get richer and the poor get poorer. I have mentioned this before, and it applies here again.Go to the U of Michigan College of Engineering parking lot. How can you say what car the $300,000 a year (ACADEMIC year of 9 months, mind you, summer pay is extra, and consulting a whole lot on top of that) and what does the $50,000 a year secretary drive?Hint: Teresa was out chair's secretary, started a year ago. She had to resign in just a few months because her 75 mile EACH WAY from her home in Lapeer MI to ANn Arbor MI just KILLED HER when gas prices rose.What car did Teresa drive? Take a wild guess. An F150? A Ram pickup? A Silverado? One of these. In a fee months she had to resign and find a lesser job in the whole lot lesser U of M Flint (but why would she care? she's just a secretary), which halved her commuting distance to a still significant 75 mile round trip every damned day.So the poor keep buying pickups and get poorer, and the rich keep NOT buying them and get richer.
- Cprescott It is ugly enough. But why? You refuse to build enough of your products for your consumers.
- Cprescott Only if your income also gives you more votes.
The 3 is due for an update... The 6 is due for an update... Neither one has anything resembling performance. Not even a sport package is offered. The 6 dash looks like something a 70 year old Camry owner would enjoy. Noise issues are famous on the 6. The CX-5 is due for an update... The CX-4 would probably do great in the US, but Mazda is not interested in giving the US any sort of interesting vehicles, trim level, powertrains, etc. Other than an interesting MX-5, Mazda isn't doing anything interesting in the US. Being an '05 6 owner I've seen enough complaints on the current car that I'd have to find one helluva deal before I'd buy one. Then again, not sure I'd want another Mazda... Seat fabrics were garbage. Interior assembly is nearly all push clips. Mazda didn't rust-proof wheel wells, and well, I've fought rust for 3 years. Six months ago the headliner must have decided 'I'm done'. It just started dropping in numerous places. Out of the blue the passenger side fr door window stopped working from the driver's control. Two weeks ago the driver's rear door window stopped working from its own control. Headlights started hazing. NEVER used any sort of chemical cleaner on them. Driver's side apparently has a leaking seal- cold water when washing car is causing fogging. Eleven years and 112,000 miles and it's falling apart. And I'm the guy everyone makes fun of because I take care of my car better than some do their children. Previous car was a '92 Integra that aged FAR better in my 15 years and 199,000 miles with it.
The correct title would be "Mazda sold less cars than crossovers". Mazda was the Pontiac division of FMC but much better. Both were gone during Great Recession. In 2014 my choice for the new car boiled down to Mazda6 GT and Fusion Titanium. I test drove both back to back - Ford was a much more refined and powerful for the almost the same money. It just felt as a premium German sports sedan compared with Mazda. The problem with Mazda is that they asking too much for their cars and do not have engines to compete with big guys. BTW I would also compare Mazda6 to the first gen Acura TSX except Acura was a better car. Cannot compare Mazda6 to Audi though.