Cadillac President Will Pay Dealers to Disappear

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

If dealership owners spring for a recent offer by the president of Cadillac, expect to see a vastly reduced brand presence in towns and cities across the U.S.

Johan de Nysschen is offering 400 low-volume Cadillac dealers cash to close up shop and walk away, Automotive News reports.

It’s nothing personal, the brand’s performance-focused leader claims — just business.

In an interview with AN, de Nysschen claims the brand has too many dealerships as it is, at least when compared to its luxury rivals. Paring down the herd, even significantly (the 400 dealers are 43 percent of the brand’s U.S. dealer presence), would make it easier for the brand’s dealers to fold into the executive’s controversial “ Project Pinnacle.”

That program, due to kick off on January 1, would see dealers slotted into five tiers based on sales volume, each offering a certain level of customer perks. Compensation from the automaker would be tied to sales performance.

Because dealers would need to invest in their facilities to upgrade their services, the buyout offer gives smaller dealers a chance to avoid the hassle, de Nysschen says. The offers starts at $100,000 and rises to $180,000, depending on the operation. The 400 targeted dealers each sold less than 50 Cadillacs last year.

Ideally, de Nysschen would like every Cadillac dealer in the country to be on board with Project Pinnacle. “Our target is zero,” de Nysschen said. “Our target is to have 100 percent of the Cadillac dealers engaged with the Cadillac business.”

Backlash against the program has grown since de Nysschen introduced it. A California dealer group recently wrote to General Motors CEO Mary Barra in a bid to delay the rollout. The group claimed Project Pinnacle violated state franchise laws, heaped unfair costs onto dealerships, and discriminated against smaller dealers.

It’s hard to see this buyout offer as anything other than a make-the-problem-go-away effort.

[Image: © 2016 Matthew Guy/The Truth About Cars]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 69 comments
  • Jeff S Jeff S on Sep 26, 2016

    In many smaller communities the dealers disappeared because they were forced to take a specific number of vehicles and an allocation of types of vehicles that they could not sell in their communities. Many smaller dealerships have for the most part disappeared. At one time the small town near where my grandparents farm was had a Dodge, Ford, Oldsmobile-International dealerships in a county of about 2,000 population. Profitability of a small GM dealership is not that much in today's world of mega dealerships and the internet. Most buyers are looking for the best price.

  • Boomstick0 Boomstick0 on Oct 19, 2016

    I have to drive 50 miles to the nearest Cadillac dealer, and because they didn't particularly do a very good job, I have to drive 90 miles to the next nearest alternative. Too many dealers? Give me a break. Are they trying to kill the brand?

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next