Revealed: The Tesla Model 3 Offers 215 Miles of Range and a Vague Delivery Date

by Steph Willems

Published: April 1st, 2016

revealed the tesla model 3 offers 215 miles of range and a vague delivery date

The Tesla Model 3 had its curtain of hype lifted tonight, and it exists after all.

Sleek, with pronounced shoulders and a roofline that slopes to the decklid, the newest Tesla remains over a year away from production, but at least it now has a face.

Or lack thereof. But more on that later.

Tesla founder Elon Musk said the Model 3 will have an EPA-rated range of “at least” 215 miles, and will retail for $35,000. Every Model 3 — even base versions — will hit 60 miles per hour in less than six seconds.

“These are minimum numbers,” said Musk. “We hope to exceed them.”

Musk’s allusion to a performance range implies that a dual motor setup could be an option.

The Model 3’s recessed dash means that front-seat occupants will sit well forward, allowing enough legroom for five adults. The rear roof is a solid pane of glass that begins just ahead of the rear seat passengers and continues to the trunklid.

With storage up front and in the back, Musk promised that the Model 3 would have “more cargo capacity than any gasoline car with the same exterior dimensions.”

Safety is “paramount” for Musk, who said the Model 3 will achieve five-star crash ratings in every category, and each version will come with Autopilot autonomous hardware installed.

Viewed from the front, the Model 3 vaguely resembles a Porsche Panamera. However, besides a slit in the lower fascia, the centre of the Model’s 3’s face is scrubbed clean of features. That flat expanse seems to be the vehicle’s only controversial element.

More details on the Model 3 will be revealed during “Phase 2” of the launch, which won’t happen until much closer to production.

Musk unveiled the model after explaining how the Roadster, Model S and X were all part of his three-pronged master plan to produce the societal change (and cash) needed to market a mass-produced electric car at an attainable price.

On the same day he began accepting $1,000 pre-orders from prospective buyers, Musk said over 115,000 people have signed up for the Model 3.

In order to have charging infrastructure in place for buyers, Musk said Tesla will double the number of Supercharger stations by the end of next year — 7,200 worldwide. Destination chargers will also double in number, to 15,000.

Tesla’s dealer network, which currently numbers 215 locations, will rise to 441 in the same time period.

Production of the Model 3 is expected to begin in late 2017, with the first units off the line going to existing Tesla owners on the west coast.

When exactly will the first deliveries be made? Musk couldn’t say.

“Well, they’re next year,” said Musk. “I do feel fairly confident it will be next year.”

[Image: Tesla Motors]

#ElectricVehicles #Environment #EV #Green #Tesla #TeslaModel3

Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments

Join the conversation

5 of 191 comments

JonBoy470 on Apr 01, 2016

Personally I like the minimalist Dieter Rams Jony Ive interior. It's clean, and lacking all the busy useless bullshit inside that so many cars have these days. As for post-sale service, it needs almost nothing in terms of routine maintenance, compared to a gas car.

Like Reply
Speedlaw on Apr 03, 2016

The current Tesla sells to well off folks who'd otherwise lease another E class, and have at least one regular vehicle in the driveway, so they don't need 110 % uptime and don't have range anxiety. We have a few in town. The Tesla sits next to a premium SUV and a CamCord, or frequently, an enthusiast piece. Moving downmarket is to see the car to one car households, who will have range issues, and will need 110% uptime. I see a lot of folks buying into the hype, and while I'd buy a car from Tesla, I'd not give them money in the hopes of getting one. You know this company still loses money, save pollution credits, right ? For the simple fact of running a spreadsheet, and taking money, they got hype they could not buy or afford to advertise. That is the real bottom line in this situation-it isn't like there is a lot full of these awaiting delivery. "We've no product for a year, media coverage has turned on us, what to do ? Hey we can pull an Apple !!

Like Reply
- See 2 previous
- Derekson on Apr 04, 2016
  
  When did Apple make people pay up for the right to order a product that is coming out in 18 months? I think the longest lead time between a product announcement and launch was probably the original iPhone, which was demoed in January and IIRC went on sale in June 2007.
  
  Like
- Vulpine on Apr 04, 2016
  
  "Moving downmarket is to see the car to one car households, who will have range issues, and will need 110% uptime." False argument since the average American household has 2+ cars in the driveway of which one is typically used for commuting and the other typically used for shopping. Range issues would be relatively unheard of with a 200-mile car except when they go on vacation where the Tesla has and will continue to have the advantage with strategically-located Superchargers less than 200 miles apart on most interstate highways.
  
  Like
- Vulpine on Apr 04, 2016
  
  @derekson "When did Apple make people pay up for the right to order a product that is coming out in 18 months?" A cell phone is not a car. Irrelevant simile. If someone wants to order a car even from the long-established OEMs, they have to wait an average of three months on an American-built car and up to six months and longer for a European- or Asian-built car. That's for cars already in production. Cars just take longer, as seen by the auto-show circuit where a new concept may take up to four years (and in some cases ten years or more) to reach the showrooms.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Thankfully I don't have to deal with GDI issues in my Frontier. These cleaners should do well for me if I win.
Theflyersfan Serious answer time...Honda used to stand for excellence in auto engineering. Their first main claim to fame was the CVCC (we don't need a catalytic converter!) engine and it sent from there. Their suspensions, their VTEC engines, slick manual transmissions, even a stowing minivan seat, all theirs. But I think they've been coasting a bit lately. Yes, the Civic Type-R has a powerful small engine, but the Honda of old would have found a way to get more revs out of it and make it feel like an i-VTEC engine of old instead of any old turbo engine that can be found in a multitude of performance small cars. Their 1.5L turbo-4...well...have they ever figured out the oil dilution problems? Very un-Honda-like. Paint issues that still linger. Cheaper feeling interior trim. All things that fly in the face of what Honda once was. The only thing that they seem to have kept have been the sales staff that treat you with utter contempt for daring to walk into their inner sanctum and wanting a deal on something that isn't a bare-bones CR-V. So Honda, beat the rest of your Japanese and Korean rivals, and plug-in hybridize everything. If you want a relatively (in an engineering way) easy way to get ahead of the curve, raise the CAFE score, and have a major point to advertise, and be able to sell to those who can't plug in easily, sell them on something that will get, for example, 35% better mileage, plug in when you get a chance, and drives like a Honda. Bring back some of the engineering skills that Honda once stood for. And then start introducing a portfolio of EVs once people are more comfortable with the idea of plugging in. People seeing that they can easily use an EV for their daily errands with the gas engine never starting will eventually sell them on a future EV because that range anxiety will be lessened. The all EV leap is still a bridge too far, especially as recent sales numbers have shown. Baby steps. That's how you win people over.
Theflyersfan If this saves (or delays) an expensive carbon brushing off of the valves down the road, I'll take a case. I understand that can be a very expensive bit of scheduled maintenance.
Zipper69 A Mini should have 2 doors and 4 cylinders and tires the size of dinner plates.All else is puffery.
Theflyersfan Just in time for the weekend!!! Usual suspects A: All EVs are evil golf carts, spewing nothing but virtue signaling about saving the earth, all the while hacking the limbs off of small kids in Africa, money losing pits of despair that no buyer would ever need and anyone that buys one is a raging moron with no brains and the automakers who make them want to go bankrupt.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Usual suspects B: All EVs are powered by unicorns and lollypops with no pollution, drive like dreams, all drivers don't mind stopping for hours on end, eating trays of fast food at every rest stop waiting for charges, save the world by using no gas and batteries are friendly to everyone, bugs included. Everyone should torch their ICE cars now and buy a Tesla or Bolt post haste.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Or those in the middle: Maybe one of these days, when the charging infrastructure is better, or there are more options that don't cost as much, one will be considered as part of a rational decision based on driving needs, purchasing costs environmental impact, total cost of ownership, and ease of charging.(Source: many on this site who don't jump on TTAC the split second an EV article appears and lives to trash everyone who is a fan of EVs.)