Junkyard Find: 1988 Ford Escort GT

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin
The first-generation North American Ford Escort looked a lot like its European namesake, but was a very different machine under the skin. For the 1991 model year, the Escort moved to the same platform as the Mazda 323, so the late-’80s models are the last of the all-Ford American Escorts.Here’s one that I spotted in a Northern California yard.
For some reason, 1988 model-year Escort GTs are the ones I find in these self-service yards; so far in this series, we have seen this first-half-of-1988 red one and this post-mid-model-year-refresh white one. Today’s Escort is another “1988.5” version.
The 1.9-liter CVH engine in this car made 110 horsepower. This would be considered intolerable in 2016, but wasn’t bad back then.
Poor bedraggled junkyard mini-disco-ball.
I hadn’t seen one of these Ford-issued EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM MODIFIED stickers in a California car before. Since the California emissions check involves a ball-bustingly strict, factory-equipment inspection, this probably authorizes a different type of EGR valve or similar minor change.
A much worn, late-1980s-vintage KEEP ABORTION LEGAL sticker is a very San Francisco Bay Area-appropriate accessory.
The list price on this car was $9,093, which was a lot cheaper than the 132 hp, $12,058 Mazda 323 GT Turbo. However, the 1988 Dodge Omni GLH (which was lighter and had the same horsepower as the Escort GT) sold for a mere $8,226.
Weedly-weeee guitars and a trip to Club 911? Take the Escort GT![Images: © 2016 Murilee Martin/The Truth About Cars]
Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 53 comments
  • Jeff S Jeff S on Apr 29, 2016

    I am happy to hear about your good service experience. I had a 85 Mercury Lynx that was the worst car I have ever owned. Four speed manual 2 door charcoal grey with matching interior. The electronic carburetor went which was very expensive, the 4 speed manual transmission seized which I had replaced with a junkyard transmission (the only manual that I ever had that went out). the heads went, and then at the bottom of the firewall the car was rusting out to where it was unsafe (the only place where there was rust). I didn't want to sell the Lynx to anyone so I traded it in on a new 1994 Ford LX wagon with a 5 speed manual which was excellent and a trouble free car. The Mazda based Escorts were a much better car than the earlier Escorts. The Ford Ranger was vastly improved when it became Mazda based.

    • DohctorSmith DohctorSmith on May 04, 2016

      Uh, the Ranger was never Mazda based. 1993 and on, the Mazda B series was Ford based. Engines and all.

  • Cimarron typeR Cimarron typeR on May 05, 2016

    What was the name of the sportback version? I remember the son of the Police chief in my hometown got one new. Looked fast but my MK1 GTI was faster( 0-60 9.5 sec.?)

    • Corey Lewis Corey Lewis on May 05, 2016

      Are you thinking of the Ford EXP/Mercury Lynx? Or did you mean the Merkur XR4Ti?

  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next