Hyundai Reportedly Building N Vision 74

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Reports from South Korea are claiming that Hyundai will build a limited number of the N Vision 74, pegging the production figure at just 100 units. This comes after the company filed a trademark for the “N74” moniker, Till Wartenberg (vice president Hyundai’s N performance division) expressed interest in seeing the concept become a production model, and sustained rumors that the automaker was on the cusp of approving the model.


When the N Vision 74 debuted, just about every automotive writer soiled themselves with excitement. For a long time, invigorating automotive designs intentionally hearkened back to an era catered heavily toward older generations. Now, we’re starting to see vehicles modeled inspired by cars that were made after the invention of the personal computer.

Hyundai claims that the 74 was inspired by the brand’s 1974 Pony Coupe concept designed by Goigetto Giugiaro (above). While the resulting production vehicle failed to embrace the best elements of Giugiaro’s creation, the N Vision 74 absolutely does. But the vehicle also seems to borrow from the DMC DeLorean, Group B Rally Cars, and a smattering of other vehicles from the 1980s that many of us coveted in our younger years.


According to South Korea’s ETNews, formerly the Electronic Times, Hyundai plans on building 100 vehicles based upon the hydrogen-electric hybrid concept. The outlet said 30 of those were to be reserved for racing applications, with the remaining 70 to be sold to the public. Though, with such a limited production run, “the public” will probably be heavily vetted by Hyundai before they’re allowed to take ownership. The company reportedly sees the model as a supercar and intends on treating it as if that’s the case.

However, if the numbers being suggested are to be believed, it should offer supercar levels of performance while the hydrogen-electric powertrain will make it even less practical than one. When Hyundai showed off its N74 test mule to journalists, the vehicle was said to have a pair of 335-horsepower electric motors driving the rear axle. The production version is alleged to boast 800 hp in total.


Since we don’t speak Korean, some aspects of the report are likely to be lost in translation. But the outlet claims production is being targeted to begin in the first half of 2026. It’s also very bullish on Hyundai being serious about building it, despite the manufacturer staying quiet on making any formal commitments. Still, the company continues to hype the N Vision 74 and has a dedicated test mule. The vehicle serves some purpose for Hyundai that goes beyond showing off what the design team is capable of.

That said, putting a vehicle like this into production would be a pretty wild move or the brand to make. Hyundai has long been synonymous with affordable, high-volume vehicles and the N74 certainly won’t be either of those things.


But Hyundai has also been trying to broaden its image. Launching the Genesis brand proved it could build a competent luxury vehicle, the IONIQ nameplate got it into the world of EVs, and the N performance brand showed the world that the company could produce truly exciting vehicles. It’s also undeniable that Kia and Hyundai designs have gotten quite good in recent years. Leadership knows this, as it was part of the automaker’s master plan to enhance its credibility after achieving enviable production volumes.

The next step may be building a supercar. Honda did it with the NSX. Though Hyundai’s present trajectory is giving off more peak-Mitsubishi vibes — back when the Yamauchi Diamond Crest was known for putting out affordable automobiles that could absolutely rip, rather than forgettable crossovers for people who just need basic transportation.


We’ll have to see if Hyundai actually comes through with the production N74. While it feels too impractical for the brand to move on, it has already dumped a lot of time and energy into the project. The company is also trying to boost its reputation and building an ultra-rare performance vehicle based on a captivating concept would certainly do that.

[Images: Hyundai Motor Group]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 33 comments
  • Undead Zed Undead Zed on Dec 20, 2023

    This is a cool limited-production model so I doubt they'll have trouble selling the 70, but I would love to see them do a follow-up full production BEV based on this design. They've already proved they can make it fun with the Ioniq 5 N, just put that in a smaller, sleeker 2 door package.

  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Dec 20, 2023

    Take a lesson from Analog: Know why you are here; know why you are posting. (He doesn't lol)

  • KOKing I owned a Paul Bracq-penned BMW E24 some time ago, and I recently started considering getting Sacco's contemporary, the W124 coupe.
  • Bob The answer is partially that stupid manufacturers stopped producing desirable PHEVs.I bought my older kid a beautiful 2011 Volt, #584 off the assembly line and #000007 for HOV exemption in MD. We love the car. It was clearly an old guy's car, and his kids took away his license.It's a perfect car for a high school kid, really. 35 miles battery range gets her to high school, job, practice, and all her friend's houses with a trickle charge from the 120V outlet. In one year (~7k miles), I have put about 10 gallons of gas in her car, and most of that was for the required VA emissions check minimum engine runtime.But -- most importantly -- that gas tank will let her make the 300-mile trip to college in one shot so that when she is allowed to bring her car on campus, she will actually get there!I'm so impressed with the drivetrain that I have active price alerts for the Cadillac CT6 2.0e PHEV on about 12 different marketplaces to replace my BMW. Would I actually trade in my 3GT for a CT6? Well, it depends on what broke in German that week....
  • ToolGuy Different vehicle of mine: A truck. 'Example' driving pattern: 3/3/4 miles. 9/12/12/9 miles. 1/1/3/3 miles. 5/5 miles. Call that a 'typical' week. Would I ever replace the ICE powertrain in that truck? No, not now. Would I ever convert that truck to EV? Yes, very possibly. Would I ever convert it to a hybrid or PHEV? No, that would be goofy and pointless. 🙂
  • ChristianWimmer Took my ‘89 500SL R129 out for a spin in his honor (not a recent photo).Other great Mercedes’ designers were Friedrich Geiger, who styled the 1930s 500K/540K Roadsters and my favorite S-Class - the W116 - among others. Paul Bracq is also a legend.RIP, Bruno.
  • ToolGuy Currently my drives tend to be either extra short or fairly long. (We'll pick that vehicle over there and figure in the last month, 5 miles round trip 3 times a week, plus 1,000 miles round trip once.) The short trips are torture for the internal combustion powertrain, the long trips are (relative) torture for my wallet. There is no possible way that the math works to justify an 'upgrade' to a more efficient ICE, or an EV, or a hybrid, or a PHEV. Plus my long trips tend to include (very) out of the way places. One day the math will work and the range will work and the infrastructure will work (if the range works) and it will work in favor of a straight EV (purchased used). At that point the short trips won't be torture for the EV components and the long trips shouldn't hurt my wallet. What we will have at that point is the steady drip-drip-drip of long-term battery degradation. (I always pictured myself buying generic modular replacement cells at Harbor Freight or its future equivalent, but who knows if that will be possible). The other option that would almost possibly work math-wise would be to lease a new EV at some future point (but the payment would need to be really right). TL;DR: ICE now, EV later, Hybrid maybe, PHEV probably never.
Next