U.S. Auto Brand Sales Results – March 2015 YTD: Not As Bad As Expected

by Timothy Cain

April 1st, 2015 2:58 PM

An anticipated 1% year-over-year decline in U.S. auto sales in March 2015, a slightly shorter sales month than March 2014, failed to materialize as a number of auto brands reported significant improvements and most decreases were slight. As a result, U.S. auto sales actually improved slightly last month and rose nearly 6% in the first-quarter of 2015.

Premium auto brands left an especially strong footprint on the improved March figures. Audi, BMW, Lexus, and Mercedes-Benz – the four top-selling luxury brands in March – posted 20%, 7%, 9%, and 9% gains, respectively.

Meanwhile, at the top of the heap, Toyota easily outsold Chevrolet to claim the second spot behind Ford, which said a retail sales increase was counteracted by a sharp fleet sales decline.

AutomakerMarch 2015march 2014% Change2015 YTD2014 YTD% ChangeAcura 14,67015,580-5.8%39,64437,9484.5%Alfa Romeo 73——217——Audi 17,10214,24620.0%40,09835,22813.8%BMW 34,31032,1076.9%78,49272,3778.4%Buick 20,52620,4280.5%50,49752,898-4.5%Cadillac 13,75614,765-6.8%37,17539,588-6.1%Chevrolet 173,886179,681-3.2%476,556452,6835.3%Chrysler 30,03826,14014.9%81,933 72,48313.0%Dodge 46,04960,575-24.0%123,511145,224-15.0%Fiat4,4944,738 -5.1%11,03811,425-3.4%Ford 226,091234,448-3.6%570,422558,6572.1%GMC 41,70741,1731.3%119,811104,46814.7%Honda 111,623117,738-5.2%294,299287,4062.4%Hyundai 75,019 67,005 12.0%172,029160,013 7.5%Infiniti 12,52512,4940.2%33,84231,2218.4%Jaguar 1,6601,816-8.6%43364,715-8.0%Jeep 71,58457,98323.5%178,749145,83922.6%Kia 58,77154,7777.3% 141,100133,0066.1%Land Rover 6,7784,39954.1%16,97613,07929.8%Lexus 31,05428,5938.6%77,18065,08518.6%Lincoln 8,6958,969-3.1%21,47821,603-0.6%Maserati 9969633.4%1,9292,368-18.5%Mazda 32,12334,903-8.0%78,04478,057-0.02%Mercedes-Benz 29,92127,401 9.2% 78,156 72,614 7.6%Mercedes-Benz Sprinter 2,3791,915 24.2% 5,559 4,624 20.2%Total Mercedes-Benz 32,300 29,316 10.2%83,715 77,238 8.4%Mini 5,8293,65559.5%12,7778,65747.6%Mitsubishi 9,7648,9968.5%23,79019,84019.9%Nissan 132,560136,642-3.0%333,786323,7453.1%Porsche 4,2913,808 12.7%11,43010,13612.8%Ram 45,02344,4791.2%110,406100,9939.3%Scion 4,424 5,917-25.2%11,97814,457-17.1%Smart 583775-24.8%1,5332,237-31.5%Subaru 49,11144,47910.4%131,281112,38816.8%Toyota 190,481180,8385.3%486,462441,45510.2%Volkswagen 30,02536,717-18.2%79,23987,323-9.3%Volvo 5,9165,9150.02%13,72213,6980.2%————— ——BMW-Mini 40,13935,76212.2%91,26981,03412.6%FCA/Chrysler Group 197,261193,9151.7%505,854475,9646.3%Daimler32,88330,0919.3%85,24879,4757.3%Ford Motor Company 234,786243,417-3.5% 591,900580,2602.0%General Motors 249,875256,047-2.4%684,039649,6375.3%Honda Motor Company 126,293133,318-5.3%333,943 325,3542.6%Hyundai-Kia 133,790121,7829.9%313,129293,0196.9%Jaguar-Land Rover 8,4386,21535.8%21,312 17,79419.8%Nissan Motor Company 145,085149,136-2.7%367,628354,9663.6%Toyota Motor Corporation 225,959215,3484.9%575,620 520,99710.5%Volkswagen Group * 57,63855,051 4.7% 131,279132,870-1.2%———————Industry Total **1,545,710 1,537,282 0.5% 3,954,946 3,744,021 5.6%

* Volkswagen Group includes sales figures for Audi, Bentley, Porsche, and Volkswagen brands.

** Industry total takes into account Automotive News estimates for brands such as Tesla (1200 March units) and other low-volume, high-priced manufacturers.

Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures.

#AutoSales #BrandSalesFigures #March2015Sales #U.S.AutoSales

Comments

Join the conversation

3 of 13 comments

WriterRRex on Apr 01, 2015

Ok, I'll ask the dumb question--why is March 2015 a shorter sales month than March 2014? I'd first thought that it was because of Sundays, since in most places Sundays aren't counted as sales days; both March 2014 and 2015 have 5 Sundays. What makes the difference in the sales months? And, if March 2015 is a shorter month, does that also make the YTD figures suspect? (YTD covers from 1/1 of each year, right? Were either January or February also "short months" in either year?

Like Reply
- Sunridge place on Apr 02, 2015
  
  When the last day of the month falls on a weekend, sales from the previous month carry through close of business on the first Monday. So, March 2015 sales actually started on March 3rd vs March 1 last year. March 2014 also had five selling weekends versus four selling weekends in March 2015.
  
  Like
Hifi on Apr 02, 2015

None of this makes any difference unless you consider the average transaction price. Most brands are attempting to do what Cadillac is doing. I am not as surprised as some people are that Cadillac's sales have declined. That was intentional. The average transaction price is considerably higher, and they are getting more affluent customers, and much fewer entry level customers. None of the information above matters without knowing if the overall price is increasing or not.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

ToolGuy "Simply put, the world is changing, and our industry needs to change with it,"Q: How many auto execs does it take to change a lightbulb?A: 'Change???'
ToolGuy 134 cubic inch V6 with turbos and Firestone tires? Pass. 🙂
ToolGuy "Coolant ball delete" was new to me.
ToolGuy Cool.
Craiger I had a 2003 Z4 for three years. I didn't care for it. I should have driven it before I got it, but I didn't. I had driven a Z3 and liked it, plus my E39 530 was just coming off its lease, so I was pretty drunk on the blue and white kool-aid. I wanted a convertible. I cross shopped the 986 Boxster but the ergonomics weren't good for me, and that cheap 986/996 interior...The early EPS in the car was numb. Quite the let-down after the magnificent 530 mit der sport package. The run-flats sucked. I bent a 19" inch wheel 5 or 6 times in Manhattan with those tires. After the Z4 I got a Cayman S with 19s and never bent a wheel once. The Z4 came with the insipid clutch dampener, which Dave Zeckhausen removed for me at his house one afternoon.Other than that I liked the Z4. Nicely made, no service issues, nice engine and stick, fantastic rear suspension. The power top was fast. It was a nicely made car.I had driven a Z4M, which did not have run-flats, and which was fitted with hydraulic power steering, and that thing was sweet.