Junkyard Find: 1971 MGB

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

You see plenty of Fiat 124 Sport Spiders in self-service wrecking yards these days, but junked MGBs— which were more commonplace back in the day— are fairly rare. The MGB was slower, less sophisticated, and sturdier than its Fiat competitor, and it still has a big following today. This could mean that more MGB projects get finished, while 124 Spider projects languish for decades before getting discarded.

This car still has its SU carburetors, which must be worth dozens of dollars.

Judging from the very crispy interior and radiation-blasted paint, this car spent a decade or so outdoors and exposed to the Colorado elements.

Still, it has some usable parts. I’d grab that steering wheel for my stranded-in-California Sprite project, but it already has a sharp-looking Jaguar wheel.














Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 39 comments
  • Forestghost07 Forestghost07 on Jul 02, 2015

    I read somewhere that BL was tagged the biggest corporate blunder ever. My uneducated guess is the suicide was caused by many factors ... our EPA, the Nissan/Toyota spying and subsequent invasion of the world's car mkts, the British labour scenario of the 70's, Mrs. Thatcher, Sir Michael Edwardes (not sure what he did), the in-fighting amongst BL's divisions, and plain ol' corporate greed. Failure was inevitable. I'm grateful tho, that some of BL's products live on ... and that the level of love and support for them is so high. Also happy to see youngsters getting involved :) And re MGs; the elec. and mechanical problems are history (IF one applies onself to the task!), every single part is available and reasonable, even superchargers and new body shells (!!), owners come together to mutual-aid and party, etc. To try care and feed other '70s Euro cars in this country is like financial and emotional torture ... been there. Keeping an MG these days is a relative pleasure; I just

  • -Nate -Nate on Jul 03, 2015

    Yep ; BL/BMC was amazing in it's ability to snatch failure from the jaws of victory . . The Japanese didn't kill them off , failure to make more than indifferent quality control on any of their well designed products did them in ~ there was a time when BMC had a massive market share and rightly so . . For those who doubt , look at how many of these cars are still running around , many unrestored just doing daily yeoman duty . . The poorly designed (deliberately so) Vega are all gone but the robust basic design of old MG products mean that like a '55 or '64 Chevy , they'll still be running and decently , long after the " better " cars have died . . Yes , I'm a BMC Fanboi but I wear NO rose tinted glasses ~ that battered 56 YEAR OLD coupe I drive daily everywhere in America leaks , creaks , rattles and drips oil but it's a joy to drive and dead easy and cheap to repair . . I'd love to have seen it make in Japan by careful , skilled workers who were glad to have a job and knew if they just shoved it out the door any old way , they'd be out of a job as the British Motor Industry is . . -Nate

  • Dwford I don't think price is the real issue. Plenty of people buy $40-50k gas vehicles every year. It's the functionality. People are worried about range and the ability to easily and quickly recharge. Also, if you want to buy an EV these days, you are mostly limited to midsize 5 passenger crossovers. How about some body style variety??
  • SCE to AUX The nose went from terrible to weird.
  • Chris P Bacon I'm not a fan of either, but if I had to choose, it would be the RAV. It's built for the long run with a NA engine and an 8 speed transmission. The Honda with a turbo and CVT might still last as long, but maintenance is going to cost more to get to 200000 miles for sure. The Honda is built for the first owner to lease and give back in 36 months. The Toyota is built to own and pass down.
  • Dwford Ford's management change their plans like they change their underwear. Where were all the prototypes of the larger EVs that were supposed to come out next year? Or for the next gen EV truck? Nowhere to be seen. Now those vaporware models are on the back burner to pursue cheaper models. Yeah, ok.
  • Wjtinfwb My comment about "missing the mark" was directed at, of the mentioned cars, none created huge demand or excitement once they were introduced. All three had some cool aspects; Thunderbird was pretty good exterior, let down by the Lincoln LS dash and the fairly weak 3.9L V8 at launch. The Prowler was super cool and unique, only the little nerf bumpers spoiled the exterior and of course the V6 was a huge letdown. SSR had the beans, but in my opinion was spoiled by the tonneau cover over the bed. Remove the cover, finish the bed with some teak or walnut and I think it could have been more appealing. All three were targeting a very small market (expensive 2-seaters without a prestige badge) which probably contributed. The PT Cruiser succeeded in this space by being both more practical and cheap. Of the three, I'd still like to have a Thunderbird in my garage in a classic color like the silver/green metallic offered in the later years.
Next