US Fiat Dealers Losing Patience As Alfa Endures Another Delay
You want the truth? The Alfa Romeo brand sounds like it’s pretty much in chaos at this point. Since Fiat first got a toehold on the North American continent, we’ve heard so many variations of the Alfa-Romeo invasion plans, each one succeeded by a new and different set of plans, that I don’t know what to believe anymore.
Back in 2010, the brand was talking about a 2012 launch and 85k annual units in the US by 2014, with the initial launch lead by the Giulia midsized sedan. Then, earlier this year, the Giulia was delayed until “mid-2013” as CEO Sergio Marchionne “was not pleased with proposals he has seen from Alfa’s creative team in Turin.” Then, in June we got a “product plan” PowerPoint slide that was supposed to guide the new new Alfa invasion plan, which had the bulk of new products arriving in the US in 2013. Then, in July we heard that the Giulia was bumped to “the end of 2013 at the earliest” and the plans were changing again. Now, Alfa CEO Harald Wester tells Automotive News [sub] that there won’t be a single Alfa in the US until 2013, and that the bulk won’t arrive until 2014. Oh, and the rear-drive flagship that Alfa denied earlier this year is back on for “after 2014.”
And the worst part of this latest change in plans? They forgot to tell the dealers…
Here’s what the plan looks like now for Fiat/Alfa dealers
2011: Fiat 500/C
2012: Fiat 500/C/Abarth/EV
2013: Above, plus Alfa Compact CUV. 4C Coupe and MiTo subcompact hot hatch arrive “halfway through 2013”
2014: Above, plus Giulia midsizer, Giulietta compact, Spider roadster.
In other words, instead of getting Alfa products starting next year, Fiat dealers have to survive on Cinquecento variants for the next 15 months. And they aren’t happy, as AN [sub] reports
“Right now I’m pretty disappointed because I have a pretty big investment in Fiat,” said Carl Galeana, owner of Fiat of Lakeside in suburban Detroit and a member of the Fiat Advisory Committee, the dealer council. “I built my store predicated on the fact there would be more than Fiat.”
The CEO of a large dealership group that owns a Fiat store said: “This delay is not positive for dealers who have invested and committed to the Fiat franchise.” The executive asked not to be named.
Meanwhile, the US-market Fiat launch is already “a tiny bit behind” according to executives, and only the most desperate gambler would wager that the new dealer net will hit its 50k sales target for this year. Even if this is the last delay for Alfa’s launch, it’s going to be a lean couple of years for the Chrysler dealers who bet big on Fiat stores, and are legally required to have standalone buildings before the first Alfa even arrives. And with the all-important Giulia already having been delayed for insufficiently strong styling three times already, Alfa had better figure out what it needs to do… and fast. “Getting it right” on product is obviously important, but that step usually precedes setting up a dealer net that’s hungry for said product. And the Giulia was originally supposed to be arriving three months from now.
How much more time do you need in the dressing room, bella?
Advo on Sep 20, 2011
Put all the Fiat managers, white collar workers, and creative teams on 12 hour, rotating shifts to maximize the time spent on the problem. But then I wouldn't trust the design quality in the same way I won't trust the built quality with sleep-deprived workers like that.
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Rich Benkwitt I’ll take that red and white 2 door and I guess the 4 banger so I can have the manual tranny just like my 1969 Bronco. I have my Wildtrak on order now waiting impatiently!
- Theflyersfan I was living in one part of the world when China and Russia were completing their 21st century scramble of Africa. They were pumping billions into the economies of these countries building new dams, bridges, skyscrapers, freeways/toll roads, utilities, power plants, you know - projects that would benefit the average resident of said location. All they wanted in exchange were the mineral, mining, fishing, timber, etc., rights of said location. And they got them. So during that era when they were looking at global expansion, we were fighting unwinnable wars and our "leaders" on the left were yelling at the "leaders" on the right and vice versa, and what happens when all you do is stare and focus on one thing like DC is known to do? The world moves on around you. And that's what happened here.We had the same opportunity to build Africa up and to make the same deals as other countries, but our "nation building" tends to take place via the conversion from something solid and standing to something in pieces and in rubble. So it looks like we'll continue to have to deal with hostile nations holding our feet into the fire and working through their many geopolitical issues just so we can continue to get cheap electronics and necessary materials in our manufacturing just because we decided around 40+ years ago to ship it all overseas because we wanted to save 50 cents on a pack of socks and the CEOs needed their next quarterly statement to look even better to the shareholders so they could increase their pay and bonuses, consequences be damned.
- DweezilSFV I didn't think GM could make a worse looking truck than their full-sizers.Success.
- DweezilSFV GM. Still trying to make OnStar happen.And still the answer to a question no one ever asked.
- Corey Lewis Look, here's the voice warning record player!http://japanesenostalgiccar.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/datsun_810_maxima_voice_box.jpg