Alfa-Bits: US Launch Delayed, Strategy Problems Arise

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

A report from Automotive News Europe [sub] says that Alfa-Romeo’s return to the US market has been delayed from late 2012 to 2013, as its parent company Fiat struggles to work out a satisfying turnaround strategy for the sporting brand. According to ANE’s sources,

In a presentation to bond holders held on March 29, [Fiat CEO Sergio] Marchionne showed a slide that said the Giulia sedan and wagon, which will replace the 159 sedan and Sportwagon, would be made in the United States starting in 2013. A year ago that slide, which was part of Fiat Group’s presentation of its five-year strategic plan, showed the Giulia models being built in Italy and debuting in North America in late 2012 as part of the brand’s return there. The Fiat spokesman now says the company still needs to decide where the make the Giulia.

Once again, Fiat finds itself torn between competing government backers. Should Fiat build the Giulia, which will be closely related to the replacement for the Chrysler 200 and Dodge Avenger, in the US (as a thank-you for receiving a bailed-out Chrysler) or in Italy (to keep jealous politicians and labor unions happy)? But it turns out that this isn’t even the extent of Alfa’s problems…

The Giulia’s delay is only partially due to Fiat’s political choice… the main reason is that “Sergio Marchionne is not satisfied with the design of the cars that will lead the brand’s comeback in the crucial market.” The report explains:

Alfa parent Fiat S.p.A. has pushed back the arrival of the Giulia models to mid-2013 from late 2012, the sources said. They blamed the delay on manufacturing and styling issues with the cars, adding that Marchionne was not pleased with proposals he has seen from Alfa’s creative team in Turin. A Fiat spokesman declined to comment when asked about the delay. Another factor slowing the Giulia’s launch, the sources said, is that Marchionne is not happy with the design proposals he’s seen from Chrysler’s U.S.-based stylists in Auburn Hills, Michigan, for the Giulia’s two siblings, the replacements for the Chrysler 200 and Dodge Avenger, which are due in 2013. The timing of the three mid-sized models is linked because they will share a platform, powertrains and major subsystems. Fiat owns 25 percent of Chrysler Group and is working to integrate the Italian and U.S. automakers.

On the one hand, this is fairly good news: having rushed the 200 into production as a stop-gap replacement for the much-maligned Sebring, it’s heartening to hear that Marchionne is taking the time to get its replacements right. After all, without a legitimate D-Segment competitor, neither Chrysler nor Dodge will ever regain their status as mainstream brands, and Alfa’s re-introduction to the US could yield little in the way of new volume. On the other hand, both Chrysler and Dodge need these models yesterday… and so does Alfa. ANE notes that, with the MiTo, Giulietta and 159, Alfa’s lineup has now been shrunk to Saab’s size. And it won’t get any new models until a C-segment crossover/SUV goes into production in late 2012.

With analysts estimating Alfa’s annual losses in the €200m+ range, the lack of forthcoming new products is raising serious questions about Alfa’s viability even in the short-to-middle term. Max Warburton of Bernstein Research notes

The Alfa plan looks more and more overambitious by the day. With just the Mito and Giulietta in the next few years, there’s probably not a robust enough platform of customers and dealers to power up to 500,000 units. Conquest sales in Europe and the U.S. will need to be massive to hit the target. Entering a new market means losing money for some year. And we all know conquest sales even in existing markets like Europe are horrendously expensive to achieve.

Meanwhile, Alfa’s volume ambitions must also be weighed against its enthusiast and brand-building ambitions. Alfa’s $60k+, 1,500-units-per-year Porsche Cayman-competitor, the 4C, could well be another money-loser for the brand, offering a Dallara-designed carbon-fiber tub construction at a price far lower than any other similarly-built car on the market. VW Chairman Ferdinand Piech has reportedly offered €800m for the Alfa brand, in order to wrap the 4C’s Italian styling around its turbo-flat-four “Baby Boxster,” an option that woud rid Fiat of a problem brand while complicating VW’s already-convoluted sports car strategy. But until Piech offers something closer to €2b for the brand, Fiat isn’t likely to bite. Which means Alfa’s future could remain up in the air for some time to come.


Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 25 comments
  • Ridoca Ridoca on Apr 11, 2011

    This is al Bullcrap, Marchionne has just denied this rumor a few minutes ago, and confirmed the Alfa Romeo US launch is scheduled for 2012. Maybe PIech had something to do with this rumor :D http://www.agi.it/english-version/business/elenco-notizie/201104111103-eco-ren1024-fiat_alfa_to_launch_in_usa_in_2012_30_stake_in_chrysler

  • Ruspa Ruspa on Apr 21, 2011

    Audi is a money loser for WV, in the way Piech is managin it. He bought our Lamborghini, and did ripped off the tech to build clones like the R8 (R8=Gallardo). I am 100% Alfista and personally owe a MiTo 1.4 Turbo 155hp (swiss-perfection engine and comfort) and my parents got a classic 156 2000cc (~10 years not a single malfunction, apart from replacing the exaust a couple of times, and oil refill), so you can call me an Alfa fanboy, but I must admit that Audi is killing us with their engines. Ok their design are choppy and very... square.. but if one wants to spend, can buy an A5 S5 with very powerful motors we can have only on maserati or ferrari. Can anyone remember Audi more than ten years ago? At the times of Audi 80 ? Those cars were horrible, kiddish, boilers on wheels, and now look at them. This denaturation of Audi is a black hole in WV budget for sure, and Piech is demanding Alfa Romeo at any cost to split the sport line on Alfa and Classy line to Audi, as it should logically be. Piech tried to match the success of MiTo and Mini with the A1 but since all this months, I've seen just an A1 so far, so I believe it had to be a failure. I mean, WV needs Alfa to learn to build powerful, quality and cheap cars. But as Top Gear's Jeremy Clarksons says: buying an Alfa is a matter of hearth. Like iPhone stuff. They see that SGS is far better, but they insist pretending that their apple product is unbeatable. And is true. At least if you don't buy a cheap entry-level MiTo as I read in this forum, you will fall in love almost instantly. Can't say why. It's not the pattriotism. It's not the quality, it's not the gorgeous look, not the known defects, it's something you can feel just when turning the ignition on on an Alfa. Alfa isn't something that you just drive, is something that you feel in your fingers! It's strange, can't describe it. Nor jeremy clarkson never was able to do even if he runs a tv program. BTW I believed Lancia was at a dead end, since the awful and shitty "Y" .. libra, musa, k, thesis... a failure next to each other. But strangely Marchionne pushes harder onto Lancia than into Alfa. We'll see. But selling AlfaRomeo to foreigners would be far much worse than selling Ferrari! Marchionne knows this very very well and simply can't do that. It's a hard load to carry at the moment, but MiTo and Giulietta are selling quite good, and now it's time to renew the police-car-segment, the 155->156->159->Giulia has to come very soon, also because the Giulietta chassis is modular and is ready to mount the trunk (in fact, the Giulia will be the Giulietta + a trunk, just like 147 and 156 in comparison). Probably marchinne isn't satisfied with the interiors and electrionics or the engines that will be available. To make it a BMW-Audi competitor again it would need also >250HP engines, which alfa already has, but in loads of variants, while Alfa at the moment has plenty of choices between 100hp and 230hp... and the next step is 300HP. The leap is quite huge.

  • Mebgardner I test drove a 2023 2.5 Rav4 last year. I passed on it because it was a very noisy interior, and handled poorly on uneven pavement (filled potholes), which Tucson has many. Very little acoustic padding mean you talk loudly above 55 mph. The forums were also talking about how the roof leaks from not properly sealed roof rack holes, and door windows leaking into the lower door interior. I did not stick around to find out if all that was true. No talk about engine troubles though, this is new info to me.
  • Dave Holzman '08 Civic (stick) that I bought used 1/31/12 with 35k on the clock. Now at 159k.It runs as nicely as it did when I bought it. I love the feel of the car. The most expensive replacement was the AC compressor, I think, but something to do with the AC that went at 80k and cost $1300 to replace. It's had more stuff replaced than I expected, but not enough to make me want to ditch a car that I truly enjoy driving.
  • ToolGuy Let's review: I am a poor unsuccessful loser. Any car company which introduced an EV which I could afford would earn my contempt. Of course I would buy it, but I wouldn't respect them. 😉
  • ToolGuy Correct answer is the one that isn't a Honda.
  • 1995 SC Man it isn't even the weekend yet
Next