Porsche Cayman R Debuts At LA Auto Show

Jack Baruth
by Jack Baruth

Porsche answered the prayers of its long-suffering enthusiast base today by introducing a low-cost, low-content, no-frills Cayman to finally bring value and performance to its model line.

Ha! Made you look! Just kidding!

The last Porsches to truly offer more for less were the 968 Club Sport, which wasn’t sold in the United States, and the 964 RS America, which wasn’t purchased in the United States, at least not in any volume. The people who brought you those great cars are long gone. We’re in the new era of Porsche now, and therefore it comes as no surprise that the “stripper” Porsche now costs more than repeatedly sleeping with a stripper named Porsche.

Your $66,300 will get you a Cayman with 121 fewer pounds of frills and frippery. There’s some aluminum in the interior and the lightweight doors from the GT3 make an appearance. The 3.4 new-gen waterboxer puts out 330 horsepower, and you get the same 19-inch wheels and limited-slip diff found in the new Boxster Spyder. It’s dropped three-quarters of an inch and you have the choice of six-speed manual or seven-speed PDK.

When I consider the fact that my 2004 Boxster S Anniversary cost $61,500 six years ago, this Cayman seems like a decent enough deal. When I think about how much the car probably costs to build, I get sick to my stomach. And when I remember that the Corvette Z06 rings the cash register at $74,285 and will absolutely violate the little pseudo-alligator around most road courses… well, at least you get a retro side-stripe for your money!

Jack Baruth
Jack Baruth

More by Jack Baruth

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 22 comments
  • Ronman Ronman on Nov 18, 2010

    I think Porsches are so overrated. they are great cars, but the people pricing them know how strong the brand is and that people are willing to pay extra, so they charge stupid money... I still don't get how Porsche can get away with charging more for much less...but then again, i dont get how people pay twice the money to get a V6 Cayenne rather than a better equipped Touareg...

  • Pete Anthan Pete Anthan on Nov 18, 2010

    Porsche "gets away" with charging more for their cars in the same way, for instance, Ford gets away with charging $40,000 plus for a body-on-frame, 1960s-tech four-wheel-drive pick-em-up truck. Because people want to drive that, as opposed to, say, a better equipped Honda Accord to and from their cubicle. That said, I was disappointed (though not at all surprised) by the Cayman R. Puny power increase, minor weight loss, hardly the race-inspired engineering feat that the ad copy describes. Any shade tree mechanic with a few thousand bucks and a '09 Cayman S could do quite a bit better for much less. Porsche continues to engineer their Cayman, Boxster, and lower Carrera variants to a price rather than performance point, creating an increasingly crowded lineup of nearly-redundant cars.

  • Theflyersfan The wheel and tire combo is tragic and the "M Stripe" has to go, but overall, this one is a keeper. Provided the mileage isn't 300,000 and the service records don't read like a horror novel, this could be one of the last (almost) unmodified E34s out there that isn't rotting in a barn. I can see this ad being taken down quickly due to someone taking the chance. Recently had some good finds here. Which means Monday, we'll see a 1999 Honda Civic with falling off body mods from Pep Boys, a rusted fart can, Honda Rot with bad paint, 400,000 miles, and a biohazard interior, all for the unrealistic price of $10,000.
  • Theflyersfan Expect a press report about an expansion of VW's Mexican plant any day now. I'm all for worker's rights to get the best (and fair) wages and benefits possible, but didn't VW, and for that matter many of the Asian and European carmaker plants in the south, already have as good of, if not better wages already? This can drive a wedge in those plants and this might be a case of be careful what you wish for.
  • Jkross22 When I think about products that I buy that are of the highest quality or are of great value, I have no idea if they are made as a whole or in parts by unionized employees. As a customer, that's really all I care about. When I think about services I receive from unionized and non-unionized employees, it varies from C- to F levels of service. Will unionizing make the cars better or worse?
  • Namesakeone I think it's the age old conundrum: Every company (or industry) wants every other one to pay its workers well; well-paid workers make great customers. But nobody wants to pay their own workers well; that would eat into profits. So instead of what Henry Ford (the first) did over a century ago, we will have a lot of companies copying Nike in the 1980s: third-world employees (with a few highly-paid celebrity athlete endorsers) selling overpriced products to upper-middle-class Americans (with a few urban street youths willing to literally kill for that product), until there are no more upper-middle-class Americans left.
  • ToolGuy I was challenged by Tim's incisive opinion, but thankfully Jeff's multiple vanilla truisms have set me straight. Or something. 😉
Next