2018 Los Angeles Auto Show Recap - Move Aside, Mobility, the Cars Were the Stars

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey
2018 los angeles auto show recap move aside mobility the cars were the stars

Outside of a Nissan-hosted panel preceding the first media day, the typically mobility discussion was muted at the 2018 Los Angeles Auto Show (and even that panel wasn’t nearly as eye-roll inducing as the usual Ford pronouncements — at least this panel included actual experts making reasonable points, even if I disagree with some of them.)

L.A. was all about the cars – cars you’ll soon be able to buy, should you have the means.

Let’s start with the Jeep. We drooled over the Gladiator as much any other outlet, and with good reason. It looks even better in person, and kudos to Fiat Chrysler for allowing stick-shift buyers to have their cake and eat it, too. You can get a manual without having to sacrifice content, so long as you buy the gas engine.

Yeah, it may just be a Wrangler with a pickup box, but that’s what most of us want out of a Jeep truck, right? Jeep had no need to get crazy here, and they didn’t, and the result is something that looks pretty awesome.

(Full disclosure: Nissan hosted myself and other journalists in Los Angeles, covering our flight, hotel, parking, and a few meals.).

Moving on to the next iconic name on the docket, the Porsche 911. I didn’t get much time near it, so I don’t have a ton of thoughts on it, other than it looks good while still being recognizable as a 911. I can’t imagine many Porsche purists will be upset with what the gang in Germany cooked up.

Lincoln’s Aviator also wowed, and while I am skeptical about the use of a smartphone app to unlock and start the vehicle, everything else about it strikes me as just what Lincoln needed. It looks good inside and out, has big power numbers on tap, and is generally the powerful, midsize luxury SUV that fits the mold of what buyers are looking for these days. And it doesn’t even have an alphanumeric name!

Yeah, it’s probably going to cost a mint and guzzle a bunch of gas, and that latter likelihood will prove problematic should gas prices spike again. But timing is important, and right now, the Aviator is the kind of vehicle that will give Lincoln a much-needed shot in the arm. Plus, there’s a plug-in hybrid version, even if its appeal was all about power.

Another key vehicle shown in L.A. is the Honda Passport. While I am disappointed in the use of black body cladding on some models, I dig the look overall. I don’t care if it’s a truncated Pilot, or if it’s a bit boring. It’s still good-looking, and the interior looks nice, and the tech specs look good on paper.

I’m less certain about the Hyundai Palisade – it looks better in person than in pictures, but it also strikes me as a little derivative (to be fair, that charge can also be made, albeit less forcefully, against the Aviator). Still, if it’s comfortable and drives well enough, it will sell. Hyundai certainly seems to have gotten the content mix correct.

I am also a little “meh” on the 2020 Toyota Corolla – it looks worlds better than what it replaces, but that said, I am not fully sold on the styling. And if it doesn’t drive as well as a Honda Civic or a Mazda 3, I’ll continue to ignore it.

I know, I know, I’ve not mentioned the Kia Soul much. But I was working on posts on other vehicles and haven’t really dug into it yet. I like the updated looks, and I will have more thoughts later.

Ah, yes, the Mazda 3. The other big show-stopper. Handsome sedan, hatch that looks better up close but has an unfortunate rear end and C-pillar area. Looks to have an intriguing new gas engine and available all-wheel drive. Will continue to offer a stick, likely to still be a blast to drive. It, along with the Gladiator, is the L.A. debut that intrigues me the most, but for different reasons. The Gladiator is a clear winner, while the 3 is a bigger gamble. It appears to be headed in the right direction, but it’s not as obviously a winner on paper. While I need to drive all of these to ensure proper judgment, the Mazda seems to be the most likely to go either way.

Finally, there is the Rivian truck and SUV. I don’t have much to say about these vehicles other than that they look cool (especially up close) and hopefully they aren’t vaporware.

However good any of these individual debuts end up on being on road, I appreciate that this year’s L.A. show was mostly stripped of bullshit. No big talks about smart cities and mobility solutions. No concepts that betrayed the heritage of a historic muscle car (yes, that’s a shot at you and your Mach 1, Ford). Even the Nissan panel – it was held off-site before the media days, and instead of an exec preaching a buzzword-heavy spiel about a future that may never occur, it included questions and answers that were as grounded in reality as they can be at panels like this.

Even the corporate speak from a scooter-company exec was interesting, if not predictable.

Nissan then had a standard press conference at its stand the next day, announcing mild updates to two lineup stalwarts. While it’s a tad surprising for an OEM to bother with a launch for such a mild refresh, it was also good to see that while Nissan isn’t ignoring the “conversation” around mobility and autonomy (how much of that conversation is or isn’t hooey is up for debate), it was able to separate that talk from the cars, which are the stars.

Volvo’s car-free press conference, which focused on autonomous-driving tech, was the only blip here. But even then, autonomous-driving tech is part of the industry now, no matter how far we are from Level 5 autonomy.

Nope, this show was all about cars – cars that will be on sale soon. Few concepts, little in the way of useless chatter. Sounds simple, but sometimes simple is best.

Hopefully all auto-show media days going forward will focus as much on the cars as this one, but I don’t hold out hope. And while I don’t want to seem like a Luddite who ignores the future – I am aware that change is coming to the automotive and transportation industries, and one shan’t ignore this fact – I do think we need to continue to cast a critical eye on all “mobility” talks until they go beyond buzzwords and get into real-world applications.

The future of the industry needs to be discussed. But some of the biggest changes are years away, and in the meantime, there’s a market of consumers to continue selling traditional cars and trucks to. The OEMs seemed to realize that this year.

Perhaps that’s the future trend I’d like most to see.

[Images © 2018 Tim Healey/TTAC]

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 26 comments
  • Carlson Fan Carlson Fan on Dec 02, 2018

    "Let’s start with the Jeep. We drooled over the Gladiator as much any other outlet, and with good reason. " LOL! Why? because of all the new tech in it? The ground breaking design/styling? You can't even get a V8 in it, so in IMO it's underpowered for any type of real towing. Who gives a rats a$$ that they offer a manual. The take rate on that will be zero and they'll discontinue it in a year or two anyways. I had a manual 5sp in my compact Toyota PU & after towing with it for a 11 years I came to hate that manual. Well hate is kind of a strong word, but you get the point. A manual was awesome in my BB Trans Am, they suck in a PU truck. Give me automatic or give me death! A V8 with an auto is lot more fun to drive in a truck than any V6/stick anyways.

  • Rasputin Rasputin on Dec 03, 2018

    Full disclosure: "Nissan hosted myself..." --> "Nissan hosted me..." I know it's petty, but me/myself and fewer/less are the two grammatical mistakes that stick in my eye throughout an entire article. They give me a negative opinion about the intelligence of the author. Probably undeserved, but there you have it.

    • See 1 previous
    • Brn Brn on Dec 03, 2018

      Authors make mistakes. Editors are supposed to catch those mistakes. In most Internet blogs, the editor is the author. Mistakes don't get caught.

  • Wolfwagen I always thought the HRV and CHR looked similar and ugly and unuseful
  • DedBull How much of that debt is directly tied to their purchase of ADESA? While wholesale volumes are down, the dealer auction is still a backbone of the used automotive industry. I assume ADESA was a functional and profitable business before it's acquisition. Break it back off, with some amount of it's debt following, and start shrinking the retail side until it is stable.
  • Jon This does not seem like anything new for Oxford. In my one visit to England 10 years ago I received a random bill from the rental car agency for a ticket long after I had come home. I was driving in Oxford, made a wrong turn, and needed to turn around. The street ended at a cross street so the only way to do so was to cross over a "bus gate" which was just some lettering painted on the street. I think it was a weekend and there was no traffic, no busses around, etc. I drove over it made my u-turn and drove back down the road I was on. I did not continue on in a bus lane or cause harm or danger to anyone. One of their cameras caught my error and sent a hefty fine. After I received it I did some research and found many folks complaining of the same thing after visits to Oxford.
  • SCE to AUX Probably couldn't afford it - happens all the time.
  • MaintenanceCosts An ugly-a$s Challenger with poor equipment choices and an ugly Dealership Default color combination, not even a manual to redeem it, still no sale.
Next