With Nothing New To Build, The UAW Charges Mitsubishi More

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer
with nothing new to build the uaw charges mitsubishi more

Automotive News [sub] reports that Mitsubishi will have to give UAW workers at its Normal, Ill plant a $1.60/hr raise because it doesn’t yet know what vehicle or platform it plans to build there in the future. Mitsubishi’s 2008 contract with the UAW required the disclosure, but the Japanese automaker requested an extension which the union membership proceeded to vote down. Because the extension failed, Mitsubishi is required by the terms of its contract to raise hourly pay to $25.60/hr. The plant in question currently builds Mitsubishi Eclipse, Endeavor and Galant models, which have collectively sold 11,215 units through August of this year. And thanks to the combination of low demand for Normal-built products, and the union’s failure to extend the decision period, it seems as though Mitsubishi may just walk away from the plant.

In a statement, the automaker said

We are disappointed with the results of this vote. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. remains concerned at the slow pace of economic recovery in the United States and current sales projections for the U.S. market. As a result, MMC is unable to announce a new model for assembly at MMNA at this juncture. In response to today’s unfortunate development, MMNA is exploring its options.

It sounds like it’s not going to be a very happy Labor Day this year, for Local 2488. But hey, at least they’ll get an extra $1.60 per hour until Mitsu decides to shut the place down. Still, with Mitsubishi averaging about 4,500 sales per month in the US and falling (for comparison, that’s less volume than the Infiniti G37, the Dodge Avenger or the Volvo Brand), you’d think the union might give their employers time to come up with a new product. Or, as we so often find ourselves saying around here, not.

Join the conversation
2 of 66 comments
  • Mmnaworker Mmnaworker on Nov 16, 2010

    I work at the Illinois plant. As usual only one side is told. Two years ago we took a $5.00 cut in pay, no 401K match, no quality bonuses, added insurance out of pocket deductibles, and a clause that after 2 years we would get back $1.67 if no new model. We realized then we had to give concessions or face a possible plant closure with the economic times. If Mitsubishi came to us and said give us the $1.67 back and we will guarantee a new model, we would have given it to them. They had two years to figure out what to do with their new models. In 2002 we posted in our plant a $600 profit, so give us the cars to build and we make them with just as high quality and productivty as any Japan plant. JUST GIVE US THE CARS TO BUILD AND MITSUBISHI ACTUALLY MARKET THE CARS AND WE WILL BOTH WIN.

  • Mmnaworker2 Mmnaworker2 on Dec 10, 2010

    First off,the reporter for this article is a idiot.The headline is pure BS.You need to get both sides before creating a lopsided "story".We gave,gave & gave back to this company and we are willing to give more to stay open.But when they have years to figure out what to do and come to us the last minute and ask for MORE time & MORE money with NO promise to keep the plant open,we said no.If you think that us(UAW)getting back a $1.67 an hr,that we gave them years ago is gonna save the company..it won't!.By the way..we gave Mitsubishi more than $40 MILLION in savings with the cuts we took and they did NOTHING with it.Now they want a $1.67 hr back and it will save the world,GIVE ME A BREAK!!We are more than willinig to help the company survive,now they need to show us they are serious and cut back on "perks"for staff & Family and managment.We did our part,we put our heart & soul into this plant for 22+ years.Would i be willing to work for less money?..yes i would,just give me a future and cars to build.SO...Mitsubishi,either SHIT OR GET OFF THE POT.We are tired of the games.

  • Dwford Are these wild prices a function of financial necessity, or does the tech and the luxury actually justify the price? I can't imagine this minivan looking thing costing over $300k
  • Lorenzo Back in olden times, I stopped reading the Superman comics for the stories. It was worth the dime to just read the letters to the editor, with all the letter writers trying to trip up the comics writers with discrepancies, mostly caused by the 4-color printing process, and others arguing the physics of of sn imaginary cartoon character who wore his underwear over his tights. I now find the same thing is hppening here. I'm beginning to shift my interest in TTAC from the articles to the comments section!
  • SCE to AUX Faraday Future shouldn't even be here, and they won't make it. Other ultra-expensive EVs are fun projects for companies who can fund them from other revenue.The Lucid Air is a strange one because it starts at $87k but can run to over $250k. Most cars jump only around 50% for top trims, not 300%.As for EVs - don't give me more power (easy); give me more range (hard). And quicker filling time.
  • Dukeisduke It's funny how stuff like this crosses over between sites nowadays - there's an article about it today on MacRumors: Polestar 2 Software Update Brings Wave of New Apple CarPlay Features - MacRumors
  • Fahrvergnugen "If you’re itching for an ultra-exclusive EV – and who isn’t – "Me...