You've GOT to Take Mercury Off Your List: Sable RIP

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

The Detroit News reports that Ford’s wind-down of its Mercury brand continues apace (i.e., very slowly). Now that the mothership has eliminated its standalone Mercury franchises, they’re using the same process of attrition to grandfather the brand’s models to death. As of Thursday, Ford will no longer build the Mercury Sable. I know, it’s a crime, right? “Ford only sold 1,158 Sables last month, down 37.8 percent compared to April 2007.” Yup, the Sable’s another D-platform loser. “That will leave Mercury with just four models,” the DetN writes, displaying an uncanny knack for numeracy, “including the Mountaineer and Grand Marquis, both of which are scheduled to be killed over the next couple of years. Mercury is supposed to get a new small car, but Ford has no other models planned for the brand at this time.” At this time? Brrrr. Will someone please close that door? Hang on; what’s this?

As we reported in our most recent Ford sales blog, Mercury outsold Lincoln last month. The margin: 7,772 vehicles (Mercury) to 5,793 (Lincoln). And while the aforementioned 1,158 Mercury Sable sales suck, that’s only 50 fewer cars shifted than the Lincoln MKS. And check this: the Milan outsold EVERY Lincoln model made (or, you know, sitting in inventory), at 2,272 units.

Here’s the deal: Ford’s longstanding and lamentable inability to take Lincoln upmarket has left Lincoln-Mercury conjoined twins. Or, if you prefer, co-dependent cannibals. Without a leg to stand on. Starving to death. Given that the new MKT and MKS look set for failure at such lofty price points, one begins to wonder if Ford isn’t killing the wrong brand. In other words, life without Jill Wagner may not be worth living.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 33 comments
  • Anonymous Anonymous on May 19, 2009

    [...] Source of post here [...]

  • Johnster Johnster on May 22, 2009
    Flarn : Mercury has wings on it’s feet…therefore it will soar. Like the Hindenburg! (Apologies to Stephen Colbert)
  • Brandon I would vote for my 23 Escape ST-Line with the 2.0L turbo and a normal 8 speed transmission instead of CVT. 250 HP, I average 28 MPG and get much higher on trips and get a nice 13" sync4 touchscreen. It leaves these 2 in my dust literally
  • JLGOLDEN When this and Hornet were revealed, I expected BOTH to quickly become best-sellers for their brands. They look great, and seem like interesting and fun alternatives in a crowded market. Alas, ambitious pricing is a bridge too far...
  • Zerofoo Modifications are funny things. I like the smoked side marker look - however having seen too many cars with butchered wire harnesses, I don't buy cars with ANY modifications. Pro-tip - put the car back to stock before you try and sell it.
  • JLGOLDEN I disagree with the author's comment on the current Murano's "annoying CVT". Murano's CVT does not fake shifts like some CVTs attempt, therefore does not cause shift shock or driveline harshness while fumbling between set ratios. Murano's CVT feels genuinely smooth and lets the (great-sounding V6) engine sing and zing along pleasantly.
  • JLGOLDEN Our family bought a 2012 Murano AWD new, and enjoyed it for 280K before we sold it last month. CVT began slipping at 230K but it was worth fixing a clean, well-cared for car. As soon as we sold the 2012, I grabbed a new 2024 Murano before the body style and powertrain changes for 2025, and (as rumored) goes to 4-cyl turbo. Sure, the current Murano feels old-school, with interior switchgear and finishes akin to a 2010 Infiniti. That's not a bad thing! Feels solid, V6 sounds awesome, and the whole platform has been around long enough that future parts & service wont be an issue.
Next