Will American Buyers Subsidize The Chinese-Market Volt?

by Edward Niedermeyer

Published: August 31st, 2010

will american buyers subsidize the chinese market volt

GM is announcing the arrival of the first “driveable Volt” in China, in a move that GM’s China boss Kevin Wale calls a sign of The General’s “long-term commitment to bringing our industry-leading technology to China.” And despite a distinct lack of Chinese demand for green vehicles, a recent survey that shows as much as 75 percent of Shanghai’s drivers plan to purchase an EV in the next three years (not to mention government plans for increased EV subsidies) is giving GM hope that its plug-in will take off there. But in order to achieve Chinese-market success with the Volt, GM will likely have to offer the vehicle at a price point well below its US-market MSRP of $41,000.

GM tells Automotive News [sub] that its Chinese Volt pricing “will be competitive,” although it’s not clear what the Volt’s competition is exactly. GM may be referring to the Chinese Volt purchase price compared to the US Volt purchase price, as the Chinese government is offering a $7,320 incentive for hybrid car purchases in five Chinese cities, while the Shenzhen government is offering a further $4,413. Those incentives should bring the Volt’s price to under $30k, but it applies equally to Chinese-market plug-ins such as the much cheaper BYD F3DM. That vehicle, which starts around $22k before government incentives, may not have the capability of the Volt, but after incentives it is priced competitively with a number of regular Chinese-market cars. Even so, the F3DM has sold only 500 units this year.

At about twice the price of the Chinese-made F3DM, the Volt has an uphill battle ahead of it… unless GM prices the Chinese version below the US price. But then The General has to worry about the perception that it’s forcing US consumers to subsidize Chinese sales of the Volt. Considering that American taxpayers bailed out GM just last year, that would make for some cold thanks. But that’s what you get when you bail out a multinational company on patriotic grounds, right?

#Bailout #China #EV #GM #Marketing #Pricing #Volt

Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 11 comments

DenverMike on Aug 31, 2010

Speaking of government subsidies, the Volt will be selling at a loss, in the U.S. as well, according to Bob Lutz when he appeared on Late Night /David Letterman.

Like Reply
Steven02 on Sep 01, 2010

I am guessing that it will be very low volume and the price won't be too much if any lower. It will be interested to see if this goes off of a lease in China.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Thankfully I don't have to deal with GDI issues in my Frontier. These cleaners should do well for me if I win.
Theflyersfan Serious answer time...Honda used to stand for excellence in auto engineering. Their first main claim to fame was the CVCC (we don't need a catalytic converter!) engine and it sent from there. Their suspensions, their VTEC engines, slick manual transmissions, even a stowing minivan seat, all theirs. But I think they've been coasting a bit lately. Yes, the Civic Type-R has a powerful small engine, but the Honda of old would have found a way to get more revs out of it and make it feel like an i-VTEC engine of old instead of any old turbo engine that can be found in a multitude of performance small cars. Their 1.5L turbo-4...well...have they ever figured out the oil dilution problems? Very un-Honda-like. Paint issues that still linger. Cheaper feeling interior trim. All things that fly in the face of what Honda once was. The only thing that they seem to have kept have been the sales staff that treat you with utter contempt for daring to walk into their inner sanctum and wanting a deal on something that isn't a bare-bones CR-V. So Honda, beat the rest of your Japanese and Korean rivals, and plug-in hybridize everything. If you want a relatively (in an engineering way) easy way to get ahead of the curve, raise the CAFE score, and have a major point to advertise, and be able to sell to those who can't plug in easily, sell them on something that will get, for example, 35% better mileage, plug in when you get a chance, and drives like a Honda. Bring back some of the engineering skills that Honda once stood for. And then start introducing a portfolio of EVs once people are more comfortable with the idea of plugging in. People seeing that they can easily use an EV for their daily errands with the gas engine never starting will eventually sell them on a future EV because that range anxiety will be lessened. The all EV leap is still a bridge too far, especially as recent sales numbers have shown. Baby steps. That's how you win people over.
Theflyersfan If this saves (or delays) an expensive carbon brushing off of the valves down the road, I'll take a case. I understand that can be a very expensive bit of scheduled maintenance.
Zipper69 A Mini should have 2 doors and 4 cylinders and tires the size of dinner plates.All else is puffery.
Theflyersfan Just in time for the weekend!!! Usual suspects A: All EVs are evil golf carts, spewing nothing but virtue signaling about saving the earth, all the while hacking the limbs off of small kids in Africa, money losing pits of despair that no buyer would ever need and anyone that buys one is a raging moron with no brains and the automakers who make them want to go bankrupt.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Usual suspects B: All EVs are powered by unicorns and lollypops with no pollution, drive like dreams, all drivers don't mind stopping for hours on end, eating trays of fast food at every rest stop waiting for charges, save the world by using no gas and batteries are friendly to everyone, bugs included. Everyone should torch their ICE cars now and buy a Tesla or Bolt post haste.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Or those in the middle: Maybe one of these days, when the charging infrastructure is better, or there are more options that don't cost as much, one will be considered as part of a rational decision based on driving needs, purchasing costs environmental impact, total cost of ownership, and ease of charging.(Source: many on this site who don't jump on TTAC the split second an EV article appears and lives to trash everyone who is a fan of EVs.)