Report: Mid-engine Corvette Prone to Getting Bent Out of Shape

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Chevrolet was expected to debut its new, mid-engine C8 Corvette sometime over the winter, but a series of delays meant the only glimpses we’ve had of the thing are of the spy shot variety. And boy, are there a lot of those. That thing gets around more than Wendy in Breaking Bad.

While a report late last year pointed to electrical issues as the reason for the delay, a new report points not only to this, but a structural problem, too.

According to sources who spoke to Hagerty, General Motors is having trouble with its new Global B electrical architecture, of which the C8 is a recipient. The cloud-based system, first promised by then-GM product chief Mark Reuss in 2015, would allow the over-the-air downloading of various features.

No one wants an American supercar with a British temperament, so it’s imperative that GM work out the bugs before the system finds its way into a production vehicle, be it a C8 or family crossover.

Just as worrisome — and time consuming — is an issue with the vehicle’s aluminum spaceframe, which reportedly flexes too much when paired with GM’s upcoming LT6 and LT8 twin-turbocharged DOHC V8s, which are rumored to fall within the 900-1,000 horsepower range. The distortion is apparently serious enough to break the glass engine cover.

Base C8s will not receive these monster engines, however. An LT2 V8 (essentially an LT1 with more athletic valves) is expected to serve as the base powerplant, Hagerty claims, providing the mid-engine Vette with an attractive starting price and upwards of 500 horsepower. No C8 is expected to receive a manual transmission; managing the power output of all C8 flavors is a Tremec seven-speed dual clutch automatic.

If alleged electrical and chassis issues weren’t enough, another source claims a third problem afflicts the model’s development. This one, however, remains cloaked in mystery, described only as a disagreement between designers and engineers. What could bring the two groups to loggerheads is anyone’s guess.

With a New York Auto Show debut looking very unlikely, Hagerty posits that we might see the C8 bow this August at the National Corvette Museum’s 25th birthday bash in Bowling Green, Kentucky, not far from the C7 and C8’s home.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 90 comments
  • Zipper69 Zipper69 on Mar 19, 2019

    Is it possible that the rear engine will lend itself to the insertion of a transfer box and AWD down the road a ways ?

  • SuperCarEnthusiast SuperCarEnthusiast on Mar 19, 2019

    Is it that hard to get GM to go out and buy a Tesla for the cloud downloading over the air function and a Mclaren for the superframe? Afterward, GM engineer put the car back together and sell it! GM might loose 20% of the cost of the cars! but look at the savings in R&D costs and testing time.

  • B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
  • FreedMike If Dodge were smart - and I don't think they are - they'd spend their money refreshing and reworking the Durango (which I think is entering model year 3,221), versus going down the same "stuff 'em full of motor and give 'em cool new paint options" path. That's the approach they used with the Charger and Challenger, and both those models are dead. The Durango is still a strong product in a strong market; why not keep it fresher?
  • Bill Wade I was driving a new Subaru a few weeks ago on I-10 near Tucson and it suddenly decided to slam on the brakes from a tumbleweed blowing across the highway. I just about had a heart attack while it nearly threw my mom through the windshield and dumped our grocery bags all over the place. It seems like a bad idea to me, the tech isn't ready.
Next